Oh Goodie! ... More on 911 (inside job) :)
- Thread starter GrowRebel
- Start date
- Status
what... huh?
Active Member
If they invented the situation, and the evidence against him... why wouldn't they? Obviously there is another reason.
(My theory makes more sense as to that)
(My theory makes more sense as to that)
The Warlord
Well-Known Member
I already touched on this in my alien attack theory. Nice pic though. Thats exactly what i said happened like 9 pages ago.!
GrowRebel
Well-Known Member
Thank you for opening this very important thread.
[FONT="]
Total bullshit ... it has already been proven scientifically that those fires were no were near hot enough to bring those building down. You refuse to address the issue of the fires cooling down 15 minutes after impact. So your "chain reaction" bullshit don't wash, and was debunked long ago.
[/FONT][FONT="]I don't have a clue why the image won't show.
[FONT="]What happen to the undamaged steel? You continue to disregard cold hard facts. [/FONT][FONT="]
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad
2. Become incredulous and indignant
Bu-bye! ... bu-bye! (happy wave here) [/FONT]
Not to mention he is totally disregarding this report, that was posted way back on page 36
[youtube]Vz43hcKYBm4[/youtube]
I provide the facts, and give the source. Something you seem to have a problem with.
I wouldn't give you a first look.
[FONT="]
Total bullshit ... it has already been proven scientifically that those fires were no were near hot enough to bring those building down. You refuse to address the issue of the fires cooling down 15 minutes after impact. So your "chain reaction" bullshit don't wash, and was debunked long ago.
It's pretty obvious it went unnoticed.
It only looks like the roof gave out first. This image shows an explosion going off at the base ...
[/FONT][FONT="]I don't have a clue why the image won't show.
Ah ... no ... it wouldn't and it didn't ... not without some serious help.
Oh yeah we remember ... the two towers burned less than 2 hours and the fire NEVER got hot enough to do the damage they claim. That has been proven without a doubt. [/FONT]
[FONT="]What happen to the undamaged steel? You continue to disregard cold hard facts. [/FONT][FONT="]
Less than 2 hours ... and not nearly as many floors needed to burn in order to bring the building down, nor nearly enough time to burn. There was way too much steel that was not damage. Yet when the building fell there was no resistance ... the disinformationalist/deniers can't get around that fact so they ignore it.
the only thing hard to conceptualize is that fire brought those building down.
There is nothing to debate. Those buildings were demo.
Where did you get that from?
I have seen not one picture showing the front half of the building engulfed in flames ... that's a fantasy on your part.
Number 18 .... number 18
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad
Well I can understand why since I continue to make you look like the dumbass you are. I can completely understand why a disinformationalist like you would be disgusted since no one with sense will buy your bullshit.
Number 2 ... number 2 ...
2. Become incredulous and indignant
Bu-bye! ... bu-bye! (happy wave here) [/FONT]
Complete and total bullshit. See all that steel? What happen to it? Where was the resistance it should have caused/I'm sorry... I meant hundreds of tons. Didn't mean to grossly overstate your position.
I am also not saying "heat rises". I said that truss under it failed.
Not to mention he is totally disregarding this report, that was posted way back on page 36
[youtube]Vz43hcKYBm4[/youtube]
This link proves nothing ... it certainly doesn't refused the infra red photos that were taken at the scene.
This is the biggest bullshit statement you have made to date. Oh right ... I'm just suppose to make shit up of my own. Oh that's right ... that's what you do.
I provide the facts, and give the source. Something you seem to have a problem with.
You conceded ass ... you would never even get as far as a date. What's makes you think I would date a dummy like you?
I wouldn't give you a first look.yeah, i know.
it would have NEVER gone unnoticed. i said this on page 3. 
there is NOWHERE to hide anything in those buildings. the support columns are next to Judy's desk. she's on the phone though, she won't notice a thing.
don't you think after there was already an attempt to blow up buildings that people would be aware of any unusual explosives strapped to the walls?
there is NOWHERE to hide anything in those buildings. the support columns are next to Judy's desk. she's on the phone though, she won't notice a thing.
don't you think after there was already an attempt to blow up buildings that people would be aware of any unusual explosives strapped to the walls?
The Warlord
Well-Known Member
What you guys who believe this fail to grasp is that weather the buildings came down or not just the fact that the jets WHERE flown into the buildigs was enough, if this were some plot to "go to war". Bombs weren't really needed. Just hitting the buildings would be enough to justify their reasoning for war. So why go to the extra effort?
It's all a fantasy. Now come out of your secret lair/basement and get on with your life. It was the muslims. Or maybe it was the deathstar and I was right all along! BWWWWAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
It's all a fantasy. Now come out of your secret lair/basement and get on with your life. It was the muslims. Or maybe it was the deathstar and I was right all along! BWWWWAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
what if ............................................ it didn't work? 
[youtube]YevmEDd80So[/youtube]
looking at the building, how it's cut out, the pile of bricks strategically placed in front of it, how it rolls perfectly over it all. ... i think this was intentionally done.
[youtube]YevmEDd80So[/youtube]
looking at the building, how it's cut out, the pile of bricks strategically placed in front of it, how it rolls perfectly over it all. ... i think this was intentionally done.
The Warlord
Well-Known Member
Yes that would have been embarassing.
what if ............................................ it didn't work?
[youtube]YevmEDd80So[/youtube]
looking at the building, how it's cut out, the pile of bricks strategically placed in front of it, how it rolls perfectly over it all. ... i think this was intentionally done.
Most likely just a big practical joke.
there is no way that was a FAIL. it was way to deliberate. the cut out on the building is pretty obvious. and it rolled over that pile of bricks way too easy. demo guys are pretty good at what they do. they most likely wanted it out of the way. now they can demo it on another lot while they rebuild that one.
it takes a LOT of explosives to destroy a building. someone would have seen the little blinking red lights.
shnkrmn
Well-Known Member
I'm astonished the building maintained integrity throughout the roll and even after. You would think once it had turned even 45 degrees from vertical that it would disintegrate. I'm thinking too, that it's not a fail; no demo could turn out quite that badly. Now that I've said that, I await proof of my ignorance!
there is no way that was a FAIL. it was way to deliberate. the cut out on the building is pretty obvious. and it rolled over that pile of bricks way too easy. demo guys are pretty good at what they do. they most likely wanted it out of the way. now they can demo it on another lot while they rebuild that one.
it takes a LOT of explosives to destroy a building. someone would have seen the little blinking red lights.
GrowRebel
Well-Known Member
And I posted back on page 80 post 798 and page 129 post 1290 Kevin Ryan essay on how and why those building were demo ... they could have easily put the explosive in under the guise of "construction work" it can be place behind paneling were no one could see it.
In the first part ...
Bremer was on the international advisory board for the Japanese mining and machinery company, Komatsu. At the time, Komatsu had been involved in a joint venture agreement with Dresser Industries, the oil-services/intelligence front in which Prescott Bush Sr. and George H. W. Bush got their start with Neil Mallon. The Komatsu-Dresser mining division operated from 1988 to 1997.In July 1996, it patented a thermite demolition device that could demolish a concrete structure at a high efficiency, while preventing a secondary problem due to noise, flying dust and chips, and the like.[25] Residues of thermite, the highly energetic chemical mixture, have been confirmed in samples of the WTC dust, and the use of thermite at the WTC was also revealed by environmental data.[1, 2, 3, 4, 26] Dresser Industries merged with Dick Cheneys Halliburton in 1998.
in the second part ...
Who could have placed explosives in the World Trade Center (WTC) towers? This is the second essay in a series that attempts to answer that question. The first installment began by considering the tenants that occupied the impact zones and the other floors that might have played a useful role in the demolition of the WTC towers. [1] The result was a picture of connections to organizations that had access to explosive materials and to the expertise required to use explosives. Additionally it was seen that, in the years preceding 9/11, the impact zone tenants had all made structural modifications to the areas where the airliners struck the buildings.
The management representatives of these tenant companies were seen to be secretive and powerful. Through these powerful people, the tenants were connected to organizations that benefited greatly from the 9/11 attacks, including the defense contractors Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Halliburton, and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). The tenants also had strong connections to the Bush family and their corporate network, including Dresser Industries (now Halliburton) and UBS, and to Deutsche Bank and its subsidiaries, reported to have brokered the insider trading deals. There were also links between these tenant companies and the terrorist-financing Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI).
How do you explain this?
sure there is ... there would be nothing to stop them from tearing out a wall or panel put in the charges and replace everything. It would be no problem what so ever to do that.
Not if they are behind the panel in the ceiling or behind a wall how could she?
How they going to see explosives if they are behind the walls?
You really need to stop posting uneducated opinions ... it only makes you look
... see above bright boy.Only to disinformationalist/deniers like yourself.
You first ...
You nor the government have no proof of that. You are merely parroting what you were told by the war criminals.
or ... maybe you are just too
to see what is going on ... it's obvious you have no education in this area ... you simply 
and expect us to take you seriously ... we don't.
The Warlord
Well-Known Member
Dude, your too funny.
So the bombs werent nessecary, they just planted them for funnsies, huh?
So the bombs werent nessecary, they just planted them for funnsies, huh?
NO WAY there was construction on multiple floors. i'm simply not buying it. like i said "I have been inside the inner workings of large buildings". there is really NOWHERE to hide. you'd be lucky to have 2 vacant floors in a row. behind what paneling? the telephone closet maybe?
if you worked there, would you have noticed? you have to insult the intelligence of EVERYONE in those buildings to believe any of this crap.
i'm starting to remember why i closed this thread.
if you worked there, would you have noticed? you have to insult the intelligence of EVERYONE in those buildings to believe any of this crap.
i'm starting to remember why i closed this thread.
The Warlord
Well-Known Member
Lol, i'm a DISINFOMATIONALIST! Nice use of the english language!
- Status