Cooking is murder!
fish.. listen to me on this one;
...but apparently there was for God..
Yeah Science is evil, I love this argument, since its so easy to refute and shows that you are in a corner. Since science did not give you the computer you are sitting right now, extend your life, provide so you have cheap food to eat. What is God going to do, tell me what diseases God has cured for us. Science did not drop the atomic bomb, humans did. Why don't you move somewhere without science and start praying for all the hardships in life to go away see how far that takes you. I am going to go work in my lab and work on medicine to to fight cancer and aids, lets see who is doing more for humanity.
This commandment is often misinterpreted. This is JEWISH law, not Christian. The inference is Thou shalt not kill another member of your own tribe. Everyone else was fair game.
as far as i know God hasnt told anyone how he came to be so I can say I dont know that answer and christians do not claim to to know how everything started.
Im no believer in each but I KNOW that there is enough proof to close the big bang theory. First did you know the theory is that the dot spun real fast and blew into all the galaxies and planets. Doesnt that mean if they were spinning one way then blew apart that scientifically they should all be spinning the same way in rotation? why are some spinning clockwise and others spinning counter?
NOW now, dont just call every person who SAYS he believes and trusts in god a "CHRISTIAN", then George bush is a "CHRISTIAN". Its what we call a good stable look for buisness.I could count the number of atheist CEO's of huge corporations responsible for polluting the environment on one hand GC, you'd probably need a pretty long list for the Christian ones. (not to mention the other believers)
point, set, match
First off the dinosoars actually did live with us. There is lots to back this up you just have to read.
What evidence is there to back that up, show me one credible piece of evidence that shows this. Don't use the foot prints next to the dinosaur thing, that has already been proven that those were not human foot prints. The dinosaur and human fossils which have been found have been dated no where near each other. When people first found dinosaur fossils they first thought they were dragon bones, thats where the connection comes from.
They actually recently uncovered a temple that was the exact description of a hebrew temple god told the people to build. And when i mean exact i mean exact, the bible took to a whole fuckin page to describe it, and just for you none bible readers thats a lot of words.
Im sorry but where did all this info popup that proved carbon dating wrong?
So many holes in your argument, I come from Africa there is no mention of a ARC anywhere in my ancient tales. The reason that a story like that is so prevalent is because Christianity has been so wide spread. Scriptures from what age, were they also written by people who were Jews, Christians, or Muslims. If so then that means nothing. Tell me about a Native American tribe with such a story. Where did you hear that there was more oxygen. Show me proof of that. If there was more oxygen does not mean that things would grow bigger. Humans require require proper nutrition to grow bigger. Humans have actually grown taller over time, not shrunk, since we are in a time of the most abundant amount of food. Of Reptiles do not stop growing but that does not mean that they will become dinosaurs that would mean that we would have a bunch of giant reptiles roaming around the size of buildings. Once a reptiles reaches a certain age they might not stop growing but they grow at a extremely slow rate. Not nearly as fast enough for them to reach the size of buildings. Studies of dinosaur fossils have shown they grew at a rate that allowed them to reach their average size. Then their growth slowed down when they reach their mature sizes.
All of that information is being flooded in my creationist, the Scientific community widely accepts carbon dating. Also different isotopes are actually used for objects older then 70,000 years old. The isotopes which are used can date as far back as .7 to 48 billion years. And the use of other isotope dating methods support the data that is gathered from carbon dating. Do you even understand what carbon dating is?
did you know carbon dating only is accurate up to 50 000 years, after that all carbon is gone. How come have they found things to be 48 billions years old? thats not possible.
That is why it is called a scientific estimate, they have tools and experiments to show that the method works. There are variables that account for more or less decay but they account for it. They also use multiple isotopes to back up the data. And you can run test and the results will usually be +/- 5% in accuracy. And when you are talking about millions and billions of years that is a good estimate. This is not estimates built on faith but on data and test, unlike the bible. Tell me where do you get this information that they cannot know. Do you even know how carbon dating works? Sounds like you don't, please understand the scientific process before you attack it.
They use other isotopes such as lead, uranium, potassium, and other isotopes. Most things might be made of carbon but they contain many other atoms. I stated this before, you are really showing your ignorance of these simple scientific methods.
sorry there are lots of holes in my info, i wrote it so fast.
no im not, your just to blind to realize you have to look at both sides of the picture. Only proven fact of age is CARBON! 50000 years than its inaccurate to tell other than the layer of ground its in. PERIOD. Please give me a link to your bullshit