Hmm, well, you saw about 12 pictures of a 3rd party grow, not my own grow, but hey, believe what you want. Yeah, I trained the people how to grow over the last few years, but I have nothing to do with their current garden. But, it's for people like you, who refuse to accept the results, and instead scream "bias", we found a researcher who likely wrote several books you read when you first started growing weed. Honestly, I doubt there will be many people in this world that will doubt his opinion or his results, which is why it's awesome that he agreed to do a test using our lights.I will stick around and watch, but it would be hard for me to trust the results of a comparison study involving LED lighting versus any other source done on behalf of someone who co-owns a LED lighting company. It just screams bias.
And no, I personally have never used LED lighting myself for a variety of reasons. The main one being that in the dozens of threads about LED lighting I have perused on this website I have never, I repeat, NEVER seen results as good as my own. And at the end of the day, there are far more experienced growers on this forum than myself so if a semi-n00b like me can outperform every single LED lighting grow I have ever seen, then why should I abandon HID lighting?
Thank you very much. Tbh I could see where very controlled conditions of LED lighting with excellent selection of wavelengths could produce respectable amounts of bud. Like, I stated before the problem is with lumenous output which means the light penetration into the lower budsites. LST'ing may be a great method to help with light penetration of LEDS.Excellent post. You made your point intelligently and managed to not be as over-eloquent as others. I can tell you have done far more research than I have on the subject at hand. The only point I was trying to make (which you confirmed) was that right now LED lighting cannot compare to HID lighting in regards to growing marijuana.
Anyway, +Rep from me to you coming right up.
In my testing, I've found that you don't need higher lumen values than what are currently available on the market, in order to get good penetration with LED's. The key problem surrounding most LED grow lights is that they use a 120 degree viewing angle. 1W LED's do not have the ability to carry light energy over long distances, and when you try and disperse 1W of light over a large area by using a 120 degree lens, the light over your respective area is much dimmer. A good way to visualize this is to think of a flashlight beam. If you adjust it to a narrow angle, the flashlight produces a bright, narrow beam. If you adjust it to a wide angle, the beam is wide and dim. The light with the narrower angle, keeps its intensity over longer distances, vs the light with a wide angle.Thank you very much. Tbh I could see where very controlled conditions of LED lighting with excellent selection of wavelengths could produce respectable amounts of bud. Like, I stated before the problem is with lumenous output which means the light penetration into the lower budsites. LST'ing may be a great method to help with light penetration of LEDS.
LEDgirl obviously knows her stuff as well, she was right on point with the wavelengths that marijuana loves. Much of other light spectrums in HPS is wasted on the plant as it doesn't really use it or only uses it in very minute percentages and the heat that hps gives off is horrible. Most leds you can hold in your hand- I'm not sure about 600w of LEDS... never tried that lol
Yes, but are those in the respective wavelengths that correspond to USABLE wavelengths?(very doubtful)... Getting 170 lpw from a white led is different than from a 420nm or 440nm. I can tell you have done your homework but as of now the photosynthetic photon flux density(ppfd) in any given LED system out there watt for watt can't equal or outperform HID lighting.There are white 1W LED's that are currently capable of producing 170 lumens per watt. That's more than HID... Cree sells them, Luxeon sells some close, and so do other major LED MFR's.
That is a fair price, but if I was to do it myself I would build a panel of the relative wavelengths with either 30 degree or 60 degree LEDS (depending on the orientation of the plants) and make sure I got the most LPW LEDS for each respective wavelength.The 126W retails at $399.95, and compares to a 400W HID in a 2' x 3' grow area. If you're looking at system cost, instead of watt per watt cost, it's similar to a nice 400W setup (air-cooled hood, quality ballast, quality bulb). LED's retain 70% of their original light output after 50,000 hours (6 solid years). There are no bulbs to replace or ballasts to replace, like HID. The power consumption is about 70-80% less than HID, while producing comparable results (though not true of all LED grow lights). There are lots of places you save with LED, but you're right that they have a higher initial cost. With the added benefit that you'll never have heat stress issues related to lighting, you can count on getting more consistent yields, and no lost crops, which is a big deal for most growers in their first 1-3 years (depending on how fast they progress).
The only other products that I think are somewhat comparable, are the lights from Theoreme Innovations or HIDHut (although both are priced WAY higher).well would u recommend any other led lights other than your own cause there a little pricey, well worth it im sure but im lookin for somethin that will grow 8-12 small plants in a 2x4x5 foot grow tent which it why im lookin into led considering all of hps heat and electricity considering i live in a apartment so if u have any suggestions let me know thanks
The researcher is Ed Rosenthal. His grow will begin in 2-3 weeks, and results will be uploaded to the web. Once it begins, I'll make sure to supply a link for everyone to watch. We are lucky that he agreed to do testing with our lights, and look forward to his outcomes.LEDGirl, who is this "professional grower" you speak of? I can tell you right now that I have never read a grow book or watched a grow video in my life so none of those "professionals" mean anything to me, but some other posters here may want to know. I am completely self taught and the only outside source of information I have ever had about growing was at this fine website. I am only on my third grow ever and am already getting great results. Trial and error along with the fine folks on this forum are the sole reasons for that.
EDIT: I would also like to check out your products for curiosity's sake. I would appreciate it if you posted a link to your site (I'm sure there wouldn't be a problem with it) and/or sent me the link.
Umm, I think you misunderstood.Haha, nearly 4000watts over a 2x4 area? If that much power is needed when using LEDs then you may want to find a new business, or at least take the black plastic off your walls and use a proper lining like Mylar or something white.
All I said was that they have white LED's at 170 lumens per watt. White LED's are the most comparable LED to a HPS or MH bulb, as they emit a full spectrum of light (more or less) just like the HID's. They do have red LED's that are currently capable of about 90 lumens per watt, which is pretty respectable for wavelength specific light. A 1000W Hortilux Blue has 80,000 lumens, so I'd say the red LED is doing very well. Anyhow, I know there's a lot more energy behind a HID than there is in a 1W LED, so I won't argue with your ppfd statementYes, but are those in the respective wavelengths that correspond to USABLE wavelengths?(very doubtful)... Getting 170 lpw from a white led is different than from a 420nm or 440nm. I can tell you have done your homework but as of now the photosynthetic photon flux density(ppfd) in any given LED system out there watt for watt can't equal or outperform HID lighting.
We offer the option of using 60 degree or 30 degree LED's. For people who want something even more custom, we do a mix of 60 and 30. We use the relative wavelengths for marijuana, and in the right ratios. We are also developing a "Pro" model light that would use the highest lumen rated LED's on the market, at each NM that we use. We're still about 2 months away from being able to offer this model, and are currently doing testing on different LED's from different MFR's on the same machine, to ensure that all readings are relative.That is a fair price, but if I was to do it myself I would build a panel of the relative wavelengths with either 30 degree or 60 degree LEDS (depending on the orientation of the plants) and make sure I got the most LPW LEDS for each respective wavelength.
Yep, it was a typo. Thanks for pointing that out I tried to fix it, but it won't let me edit my first post... interesting...Nah, I think you misposted.
"Prior to this bloom she was running 3800W of LED over the same 2 aeroponic trays that I use. Here are current progress pictures that I've been able to take of her grow:" The same units would of course be the same size which you claim is 2x4. Based on the price of LEDs you listed that would mean a setup like that would cost over $12,000 for a 2x4 area. I guess your medical patients are also herbal dealers because no way they could afford that otherwise.
I tried responding to this question once already, but I posted a link to my site because I was asked again, and the post got referred to a moderator, so I won't be posting any more links lol.I hope u can do what others have yet to be able.... And please please. I don't need to know who is doing this grow just PLEASE tell me its not that fuckin tool cervantes. +rep pending ur response lol