Please just don't cut it bub......$150, maybe.
it's free or i flee. sorry.
Please just don't cut it bub......$150, maybe.
i know, "it's like being left handed".talk about the disintegration of a thread.
So, what if the minority of people thought left handed people should be allowed to engage in polygamy? What do they make up, like 5% of the population? How would that be any different?
Aaah, I see the tactic now.. You guys think if you simply dodge the question, a valid one at that, we'll all just forget about it and see the logic behind your position...
Except that tactic only weakens your it.
Luckily, ethics and morals, well, mine anyway, are not derived from daddy government. I couldn't give a fuck less what the ''majority'' of society thinks is right or wrong. I know what is right and wrong. NEWS FLASH!! The "majority" of society thinks smoking pot is wrong, yet here you are, posting on a marijuana forum, probably smoking some as you're reading this... So whose the hypocrite?
You care what the ''majority'' of society has to say about one aspect which has nothing to do with anyone elses lives at all, but then when it comes to another aspect that you happen to partake in (smoking weed), "aaaaah it's all good, scratch that little bit... society must obviously be mistaken in that reasoning..."
What kind of Nazi tries to keep two people who love eachother from getting it legally recognized?
I really don't get it...
i know, "it's like being left handed".
um, the "majority" voted YES on pot smoking, NO on gay marriage. try again.
whoah, where'd the nazi come from?
Well I said it's similar to the black civil rights movement...
You guys reply with "no it's not, you can hide being gay, you can't hide being black".
I reply with "ok then, howbout left handed, you can't hide that, what's the difference?".
...
...
...
...then we get "what a stupid analogy..."..."that's not the same..."...
...so yeah, nobody ever explained to me what the difference was, how discriminating against the left handed members of our population (which is consistent with the homosexuals) and telling them they are not legally allowed to get married is any different than discriminating against the homosexual members...
Should I mark that one up as a point for me then or what?
this thread and the topic we are discussing is pretty much based on what happened in california. a lot of states ALLOW gay marriage, so ...........That's why it's totally legal to smoke weed in America and the Fed's don't raid places where it even is "recognized" as legal, right? Majority of AMERICA, not California.
I watched Schindlers List last night...
Did you see the deleted scene where a Hamas infiltrates the prisoners and blows Schindler up at the end?That's why it's totally legal to smoke weed in America and the Fed's don't raid places where it even is "recognized" as legal, right? Majority of AMERICA, not California.
I watched Schindlers List last night...
i didn't realize you were keeping score. so i guess you can have ALL the points. you win.
gays still can't marry in cali.
*unsubscribed to this silly GAME*
Why are you so sensitive?
It's not a game, it's a debate. Gay marriage should not be a big deal, but the people keeping equal human beings from having equal rights are making it a big deal.
I'm just digging deep to see what the real problem is with it with people. From what I can tell, people just think homosexual sex is ''disgusting, immoral, perverted, dangerous, etc.", all of which hold no basis in science, at all.
disgusting - subjective. I'm sorry but it doesn't seem OK to me for anyone to pass a law based on what they might feel is 'disgusting'. Just like the example earlier about ice cream, I hate mint, everything about it, I can't stand it. Should I be allowed to outlaw it so you can't have mint either? Not everyone thinks mint is disgusting...
immoral - subjective, same logic applies.
perverted - if you people honestly knew what turned me on, I don't think you would have a problem with gay sex... Who the hell isn't a little ''perverted'', and why is that a bad thing?
dangerous - homosexual sex is no more dangerous than heterosexual sex when taking safety into consideration. Many heterosexual couples engage in anal sex. HIV is just as easily transmitted via vagina as it is rectum. Not all male homosexual couples engage in anal sex.
And like I said about shame before. If any of them feel ashamed it's because of people like you guys, CG, SDSativa.. FDD to a more passive extent as well... You make them feel like there is something wrong with them. You regurgitate nonsense with no basis in science as if it's fact just because you've been spoonfed the stuff your whole life. Homosexual people have no reason to be ashamed of themselves. You should be ashamed of yourself for denying equal rights to equal human beings.
You're for gay rightsdo you even know how i stand on the issue of gay amrriage? i have posted it twice.
if it's not a game then stop "keeping score". you don't gets "points", in a debate.
so you can stop making an ass of yourself, i am for GAY RIGHTS.
you're the one comparing them to animals.
actualy, had you been paying atention, fdd said he was against marraige.You're for gay rights
You're against gay marriage, which gives homosexuals equal rights
...
how exactly are you "for gay rights" again?
You're for gay rights
You're against gay marriage, which gives homosexuals equal rights
...
how exactly are you "for gay rights" again?
6 posts ago you were standing in front of choda.... asking for some...
where the fuck did i say i was against gay marriage?He's against gay marriage, not gay sex.
He loves gay sex.....
IN HIS BUTT!!!