look at reality you said?
this guy did
John O'Keefe (astronomer at NASA): "We are, by astronomical standards, a pampered, cosseted, cherished group of creatures.. .. If the Universe had not been made with the most exacting precision we could never have come into existence. It is my view that these circumstances indicate the universe was created for man to live in."
think about this
The laws of physics are extremely fine tuned to permit the existence of matter, much less, the existence of biological life forms. For some of these physical laws, a change of as little as 1 part in 1037 (10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) would prevent the universe from ever containing any kind of life.
did that happen by chance?
Arno Penzias (Nobel prize in physics): "Astronomy leads us to a unique event, a universe which was created out of nothing, one with the very delicate balance needed to provide exactly the conditions required to permit life, and one which has an underlying (one might say 'supernatural') plan."
You going on about chance and odds again. Thought we had this conversation in another thread and I put it quite simply in that thread and you shut up. Now your on another thread saying the same old shit and being shown logical arguments against your BS but you will not waver. I congratulate you on your resolve but you are truely ignorant fish.look at reality you said?
this guy did
John O'Keefe (astronomer at NASA): "We are, by astronomical standards, a pampered, cosseted, cherished group of creatures.. .. If the Universe had not been made with the most exacting precision we could never have come into existence. It is my view that these circumstances indicate the universe was created for man to live in."
think about this
The laws of physics are extremely fine tuned to permit the existence of matter, much less, the existence of biological life forms. For some of these physical laws, a change of as little as 1 part in 1037 (10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) would prevent the universe from ever containing any kind of life.
did that happen by chance?
Arno Penzias (Nobel prize in physics): "Astronomy leads us to a unique event, a universe which was created out of nothing, one with the very delicate balance needed to provide exactly the conditions required to permit life, and one which has an underlying (one might say 'supernatural') plan."
Throw five decks of cards up in the air until they fall in one neat stack, sorted by suit and value. Then we can talk.You going on about chance and odds again. Thought we had this conversation in another thread and I put it quite simply in that thread and you shut up. Now your on another thread saying the same old shit and being shown logical arguments against your BS but you will not waver. I congratulate you on your resolve but you are truely ignorant fish.
Any thing can come about by chance, because there is a chance. You say the odds are 1/1000000000000000000000000000000000000 you can add as many 0's onto it as you like but odds can always come around in the end. because your saying chance you must be admitting that it could have happened. It does not matter how small of a chance there is, its still a chance. When you bring in the amount of planets there are in the universe then the chances increase, another day passes by with another chance of it happening.
Keep quoting chance and odds, it just contradicts your point.
Throw five decks of cards up in the air until they fall in one neat stack, sorted by suit and value. Then we can talk.
any odds more than 1 over 10 to the 50th power are considered an impossibility.
The laws of physics are extremely fine tuned to permit the existence of matter, much less, the existence of biological life forms. For some of these physical laws, a change of as little as 1 part in 1037 (10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) would prevent the universe from ever containing any kind of life.
did that happen by chance?
But nothing happened by chance. We are not here by chance, our existence isn't because of chance, our planet isn't because of chance, our consciousness isn't because of chance,.
You going on about chance and odds again.
Any thing can come about by chance, because there is a chance. You say the odds are 1/1000000000000000000000000000000000000 .
nope it is is not clear..fish, consider this...
I'm going to show you exactly what "odds" mean and how they mean absolutely nothing when talking about things that have already happened. Calculating odds for something that has already happened is like picking the winning lottery numbers after the lottery...
I really hope you can see how these examples defeat your position of arguing from ''odds''. You cannot calculate the odds of something that has already happened and say "see, that's way too small, it's much too unlikely..". In both examples I provided, the odds are UNIMAGINABLY small, MUCH SMALLER than any odds you could come up with in opposition to the theory of evolution, yet both of them happen...
If this isn't clear enough for you to understand, tell me.
And thats an unbiased site for you information. Hard to take any notice of the info when they state that God has no need to have been created, since He exists either outside time (where cause and effect do not operate). What a load of crap answer.
here is where i got that info from http://www.godandscience.org/love/sld009.html
The big bang theory has holes in it, meaning we dont have all the answers yet, but it certaintly got a lot less holes in it than the religouse explinations.If I may. If that is a load of crap, how say big bang?
Being a Christian isn't about trying to be "Christ like" it's realizing that you're a sinner and accepting Christ as your savior.if being christian means
your are trying to be more christ like
then why arent christian trying to be jewish
thats what jesus was ???????????????
Science hasn't changed? Really? The earth was flat at one time.The big bang theory has holes in it, meaning we dont have all the answers yet, but it certaintly got a lot less holes in it than the religouse explinations.
At least with the big bang its open to being changed according to the data we have and will get further down the line, using logical means to come to a conclusion.
Religion changes its mind about things only when it suits them to try and control and some times apease the masses.
I feel most theories that religions try to dispute have room for God, its just the religions that claim to be the way to God are contradictory to the theories.
The bible never said the world was flat science didScience hasn't changed? Really? The earth was flat at one time.
Less holes in it...
I know of no facts as to how something is created from nothing. Hate to keep beating that horse but it's a really big horse full of holes that nobody can explian.
As I said science IS open to change, thats whats good about it, it measures up the information it has to come to a conclusion. When there is new information then it will re-evaluate. Religion is less changing and only seems to change to suit its own means. eg: the Pope now says young children that died before confirmation no longer go to purgatory but now go to heaven, a changed view because the masses didn't agree with it so to appease them and keep the flock the view was changed.Science hasn't changed? Really? The earth was flat at one time.
Less holes in it...
I know of no facts as to how something is created from nothing. Hate to keep beating that horse but it's a really big horse full of holes that nobody can explian.
Please explain.
In the context of the discussion fish and I had, I was just explaining how odds don't really mean anything when trying to calculate the odds of things that have already happened. The smallest odds are meaningless if the event already happened, say there was a chance of 1 in 3 billion for some random event to happen...k, say it happened... that doesn't do anything to the odds, the odds stay the same. You can't look at the event, then calculate odds backwards... it doesn't make any sense. That's what he does with evolution, evolution happens, it's a verifiable fact, he admits micro evolution happens, then he sits there and says "but the odds against it are soooooooo small!"... as if taking both positions won't be pointed out...Dear, Sir How can you calculate the odds of something that never happend?
It's not our responsibility to explain "how everything began". That has nothing to do with the theory of evolution. So I guess a more accurate description would be "big bangers" or something similar.. I'm a proud "big banger". lmao.. Anyway.. I do not know how everything began. I'm not going to sit here and lie and say I do. Where would that get me? I know it would get me nowhere... fast. Faster than actually not knowing... It's not a secret, and I fully admit it. That my friend is progress.Again, both sides require a great leap of faith to substantiate.
I'm willing to admit I'm struggling with my faith in God but everyone on here that sounds like pure evolutionists still cannot explain how everything began. They reference highly debatable science that no one can wrap their brains around (much like god). Something does not come from nothing.
CrackerJax says you cannot immediately say a mystical person created the universe just because we don't have the answer. But so many here claim that pure raw evolution (big bang moving forward) exists like Jack Daniels. That it was distilled and delivered. Please just explain to me how it all started.
The answer is you just don't know how it all started but are not willing to consider anything outside of pure science. Or we haven't found it yet.
We will never find out how to make something out of nothing because 1+1 still equals two on the sun.
Something from nothing doesn not exist. If you think it does then we live in an ant farm and we are all wrong.
Science hasn't changed? Really? The earth was flat at one time.
Less holes in it...
I know of no facts as to how something is created from nothing. Hate to keep beating that horse but it's a really big horse full of holes that nobody can explian.
Please explain.
...and the absolute beauty of this one ladies and gentlemen... GC doesn't seem to get the irony in it...The bible never said the world was flat science did