doobnVA
Well-Known Member
That was the Oliver v. US case that was heard in 1984.
Since the Supreme Court ruled that it doesn't violate the fourth amendment, it is not an "unconstitutional" search. A judge who follows this precedent is not disregarding the constitution.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=US&vol=466&page=170
someone said before that "every President who passes through takes away more of my rights". I am simply asking for an example of ONE right that we have "lost" since Obama took office in January.
Decisions made by the SCOTUS are not "rights taken away by a President'.
Oliver V US was the precedent for allowing police searches of private property without a warrant (excluding the area immediately around the home) even if there are "no trespassing" signs posted.