cowell
Well-Known Member
Removing heat from a closed loop or a room is going to take wattage..I don't think anyone's going to argue that. It would become a personal preference at some point wouldn't it?i saw the heat exchanger lazypothead was talking about. its pretty intriguing, but the trade off is you have to have a constant supply of RUNNING water to make it work... so your either flushing water down the drain straight from the tap or your using electricity to pump the water... and then theres the problem of cooling the water once its out of the exchanger and back in the resevoir... the resevoir would have to be huge for room temp to be able to cool the hot water coming from the exchange unit fast enough to keep it cool for 12/12 or 18/6 operation... im sure theres some dwc and ebb and flow guys out there that understand what im talking about
i think the problem to overcome with this design is how to remove heat from a closed loop system without consuming watts in the process. i think a fridge would be a great gro cab, the co2 potential would be awesome with a hermitaclly sealed door... but its going to be hard to get HID lighting inside the fridge without using a cool tube. and theres also the problem of condensation, your going to be watering the plant obviously, and the plant is going to breath and release water vapor ( i forget the botanical term forgive me im stoned).. so theres going to have to be a way to exhaust the system periodically... which means lots of controls and automation. i think the whole idea is possible, but going to be very challenging engineering wise
If someone wants to use 400 watts to cool a 400 watt light, it may not be the best option (as this inline chiller will undoubtedly use way less, and is likely the ideal)..
but for sake of arguement, do you think that if he ran the same set up with a box built to contain the air conditioner (vented outside the box) into a closed loop, it would still have the same issue if it was the appropriate size to handle the load? like a 10,000 BTU unit?
I know it doens't make sence economically to do so, but I'm curious as to whether you think that would work?
I'm stuck on the fact that ambient air temps work alone.. if you cool the temp of the air at all.. isn't it better theoretically than not? Same as running an air conditioner in an adjacent room and pulling air for your cool tube from that room and vent outside.. seems like a good option to me as well.. (again, I'm talking in theory, as I'm thinking the inline cooler he's showing is pretty smart and likely would be best for the application).
And it's "transpiration"