Here is a wonderful post by subcool (a well respected member of the marijuana community) that explains why your awful logic is awful. Stop spreading misinformation.Im sorry if I'm being overly critical here but I just don't understand this at all. If you like a soaring cerebral high, just grow a sativa dominant strain(I recommend getting your hands on some super silver haze beans). That way, you can let your buds fully mature, and you will still have the high you desire. Not only will it have the same type of high, it will be much stronger and the smoke much tastier. Smoking premature bud is just like eating an under ripe banana, its about half as flavorful and about half as satisfying. I'm just trying to help you here.
Here is a thread started by fdd2blk(the man himself biatch) that explains why people like YOU are spreading mis-information. Who's awful logic is awful? Who's spreading misinformation?Here is a wonderful post by subcool (a well respected member of the marijuana community) that explains why your awful logic is awful. Stop spreading misinformation.
http://cannabisculture.com/v2/content/amber-alert
Edit: You are entitled to your opinion. Most people prefer facts and science; Especially when it comes to things that involve science.
Clearly you are not a scientist nor a connasieur. Stop it. FDD is in an invaluable member of this community and I am not speaking against him or his views.Here is a thread started by fdd2blk(the man himself biatch) that explains why people like YOU are spreading mis-information. Who's awful logic is awful? Who's spreading misinformation?
https://www.rollitup.org/general-marijuana-growing/111444-anyne-ever-smoked-overripe-buds.html
Edit: You are also entitled to your opinion. Some people(possibly you) over analyze a simple annual plant. Harvest the f-ing buds when they look ripe, this guys buds look premature. I don't need science to see the obvious.
your ignorant! each strain matures. you cannot pick the high. there is no fucking way you could pick a indica early and have it be a head high. it would be still couch lock and a little more head high but you cant 100% pick the high u want.You are being a dick, trying or not. Not only are you being a dick you are spewing regurgitated bad information at that.
Just because you prefer couchlock does not mean that everyone else does. I personally hate couchlock.
The buds were not premature. They perhaps were arguably under-developed only if you prefer couchlock. Stop being ignorant.
Read the link I posted on the artivce from subcool. You are wrong on the couchlock thing.your ignorant! each strain matures. you cannot pick the high. there is no fucking way you could pick a indica early and have it be a head high. it would be still couch lock and a little more head high but you cant 100% pick the high u want.
tell me how im being a dick. and how is actually finishing a strain which has the high you want bad information!!! if u like head highs grow sativa. i said his bud looks great. thats premo shit all i was saying was if u finish it out you get more trichs, flavor,size, etc. damn your the dick when all i was doing was giving the guy some information.
like i said like 3 times before your bud looks great man. sorry for being a "dick" when i was just giving you information
Clearly you are not a connoisseur, as you do not even know how to spell it correctly, and must have no idea of its definition(if you meant cannaseur, you spelled that wrong too, not to mention its not even a real word). Clearly you are not a scientist, because if you were, you would know that genetics are what determine what type of high a plant will produce. When one chooses to harvest may play a very small role in what type of high will be achieved, but the most important factor is genetics(fact). You are sacrificing a lot more than yield when you harvest prematurely, things like potency and flavor are inferior as well. Also, you are throwing the word fact out there a lot, who says what subcool says is fact? I wasn't aware subcool was the authority on all of pot growing. Maybe you should remove your lips from subcools man sausage for five minutes and think about this. I'm pretty sure stating someone elses opinions(once again, just because subcool is a great grower does not mean he knows everything, and certainly doesn't make everything he says a scientific fact) is not how you win an argument, where I come from that's called hearsay.Clearly you are not a scientist nor a connasieur. Stop it. FDD is in an invaluable member of this community and I am not speaking against him or his views.
Yes you will lose yield. Yield isn't for everyone. Some people grow their own yield to produce quality weed that suits their tastes: Fact. Harvesting at different times on different strains affects the ratio of cerebral to body highs: Fact. Calling someone else's opinion of a good high "bad": Opinion. Stop it.
Edit: If I'm over-analyzing a simple annual plant then so are you. It's not just about looking right. It's about harvesting your personal grow (based on scientific facts) so that it benefits you the most. It's not about harvesting weed so that the condescending e-bullies don't mock you because they lack the insight or knowledge to grasp what you prefer.
Edit: Back on topic: How long do you plan on drawing out the curing process?
Clearly you are not a connoisseur, as you do not even know how to spell it correctly, and must have no idea of its definition(if you meant cannaseur, you spelled that wrong too, not to mention its not even a real word). Clearly you are not a scientist, because if you were, you would know that genetics are what determine what type of high a plant will produce. When one chooses to harvest may play a very small role in what type of high will be achieved, but the most important factor is genetics(fact). You are sacrificing a lot more than yield when you harvest prematurely, things like potency and flavor are inferior as well(popular opinion, which I'm offering up in order to help the OP). Also, you are throwing the word fact out there a lot, who says what subcool says is fact? I wasn't aware subcool was the authority on all of pot growing. Maybe you should remove your lips from subcools man sausage for five minutes and think about this. I'm pretty sure stating someone elses opinions(once again, just because subcool is a great grower does not mean he knows everything, and certainly doesn't make everything he says a scientific fact) is not how you win an argument, where I come from that's called hearsay.
Bye the dub, how the hell is me saying you should harvest your buds when they look ready over-analyzing? It sounds like the simplest possible rule of thumb to me... fucking duh...
You argue like a conservative.
nice looken buds do you flush befor you harvest?well guys thanks for the reply's i just weight her. ... and the final wet weight is .......................................................................... 40 GRAMS!!!!!!!! holy shit its amazing meaning dry i will more than likey get my ounce off one little plant
wow sorry i hurt your feelings princess haha thats bunk lookin weed forjust messin around k it is what it is but common i have grown more plants to date than u will ever see in your life time dont talk shit like that u disrespectful sob
fuck wut they say them hoes look good. if they had it they would smoke it toowell lets see she was about a 1ft 3/4's tall when she was cut down .. but that was because i had to tie her down a bit so satanding up .. id say 2ft and a 1/2
thanks for backin me up guys
the bud was not premature at all the high got me floating in the clouds made me feel like i was on top of the world... i did smoke before i went to work and had the best day ive had in a long time and the high lasted prolly 2 hours or so
Okay, Ill keep going, you asked for it. What baseless assumptions? That you are not a scientist, and/or a connoisseur? You are right when you say I'm assuming(duh I don't know you, everything you say could be a lie, therefore everything I think about you is an assumption), but my assumptions are definitely based on what I draw from our on-going argument, so they are not baseless. Stop trying to sound smart, you're making a fool of yourself.Clearly I am the one arguing like a "conservative". Not the person making baseless assumptions off of a singular mispelled word. Yep. Why not contradict yourself some more?
Of course genetics play a larger role. I never said otherwise. Pretending I did is another typical Glen Beck assumption. Keep those idiocies coming!
Another interesting non-fact you threw out there was your ability to read minds. Apparetly you can discern my thought pattern (which you portray as "read subcool's post--> assume truth--->plant lips on dick") over the internet with many many unknown miles and people between us. This is either patently misleading or you are an idiot who can't help but jump to conclusions.
In conclusion (not jumping to them as you prefer) you are a hypocrite who can't distinguish your thoughts from reality.
Oh, and the fact that you are arguing it here proves you are over analyzing it. Especially considering the amount of resistance given to you on this particular subject. Again, stop forcing your opinions on others.
Criticism is good but not over a preference. His preference is a cerebral high, now how can all of you sit there and criticize someone over what THEY like?hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha GOD DAMNIT THIS SHIT HAS BEEN THE FUNNIEST READ ALL FUCKING NIGHT
I gotta say
EARLY
GENETICS
IS WHAT YOU
NEED TO LOOK
AT
Why not take tips these tips from the people who know???? Isn't that why you got on this site in the first place? To have the "pros" help you out? That why I did.... I take any and every advice given. I see in no way saying to early is a shot at you man. You live and learn, and frankly you just need to learn some more mane.
man I'm blazed