White House Administration escalates war on U.S. News Network

jeffchr

Well-Known Member
One of the first things Obama did was tell the white house press corps is that if they ever wanted to ask another question, don't ever ask about his birth certificate.


And that's how it's done in the transparency govt. of hope and Change....
That is some crazy claim. This is why it is becoming increasingly easy for Congress to pass the Public Option, for instance.

The right just talks bs, and the rest of the country is aware of the lies and bias. Left without an argument, a lot of Republicans are leaving the party and supporting reform. So, keep it up.
 

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
That is some crazy claim. This is why it is becoming increasingly easy for Congress to pass the Public Option, for instance.

The right just talks bs, and the rest of the country is aware of the lies and bias. Left without an argument, a lot of Republicans are leaving the party and supporting reform. So, keep it up.
Jeffchr: Quit being so levelheaded and rational, at least until I can +rep you again.

Jeez, have you NO SHAME? Prancing around here like some kind of smart person, with all your "logical" arguments and common sense.

It's embarrassing, really.
 

ink the world

Well-Known Member
Heres some great "News" coverage from Fox...i guess if the news doesnt suit your cause, you just make shit up.:cuss:


Fox actually altering a photographs of "media hitmen"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCQ4gAAVW2k

Lie trying to whip up the Christian right wing about school prayer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKV_JswtO58

Internal Memo's showing Fox News S.O.P....that isnt reporting it's called CAMPAIGNING.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oi42gRAsmUM&feature=PlayList&p=2C93EE912FAA6DCB&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=4

"terrorist Fist Jab", wonder if its still that when a Republican does the same? Or better yet when 3 Fox anchors do the same?...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0w9hVtcL0g

My personal favorite. Glen Beck getting schooled by the chicks on "The View" for his pathological lying...how sad to get owned by Barbara Walters Whoopie Goldberg etc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tg673tl4zPA


This post could go on for pages, the videos dont lie.... Unfortunately Fox news DOES.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
That is some crazy claim. This is why it is becoming increasingly easy for Congress to pass the Public Option, for instance.

The right just talks bs, and the rest of the country is aware of the lies and bias. Left without an argument, a lot of Republicans are leaving the party and supporting reform. So, keep it up.
I'm not a Republican but the polls are showing the repukes gaining and the independents leaning to the right. It is Obama who is slipping in the polls...steadily.

The campaign is over and the ideas have been looked at..... Americans are rejecting those ideas.

======================================================

Obama's birth certificate issue made it on CNN and NBC. Lou Dobbs actually makes a fair statement. "All the President of the United States has to do is produce a birth certificate." It is not about a conspiracy but rather about transparency. Obama has been asked again and again to produce his "LONG FORM" birth certificate. This issue could easily be resolved but the Obama administration continues to allow the issue to continue by closing the document from the public. Now there could be a legitimate reason why he wishes not to reveal it. Maybe it would put somebody in harms way but until the public gets some sort of response it appears this issue will continue to be before the media and rightfully so. So instead of crying "So many conspiracy theories, so little time." as Brian Williams of NBC has done in the last line of his report on this issue (see article below) why not ask the question many in the public are asking: why not release the original birth certificate and get this thing over with?
 

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
LOL. Wow, false again! obama's ratings are UP, not down! Also, Republicans are NOT gaining anything! The number of people who identify as republicans has DROPPED dramatically. It's only when you throw in the "leaning" independents that the republicans come anywhere CLOSE to the number of democrats. And we all know those "leaning" independents are just republicans who are too embarrassed to admit they're republicans!


EDITED to add screen grab of Obama's approval ratings across 7 different polls. The ONLY way you could possibly say "most of the polls show his numbers are down" is if you DISREGARD 6 OF THE 7 POLLS.
 

Attachments

jeffchr

Well-Known Member
Referring to the White House's criticism of Fox News, Steve Doocy of Fox and Friends states:
"And you know it's funny Dana, I didn't do a thorough search, but I did do a little Google thing. The New York Times came out against it, ... and the Newsweek column said that it is essentually un-American."

Newsweek called Obama un-American? Not only is that complete bullshit, it's backwards. The Newsweek article Doocy cites says that Rupert Murdoch is un-American for bringing the Australian-British-continental model of politicized media to the United States via Fox News. That's right, Newsweek is calling the very existence of Fox News un-American, not the White House for criticizing it.
 

RickWhite

Well-Known Member
How many people actually watch Fox News? It is an undeniable fact that Fox covers stories that the other networks bury due to them looking bad for Obama. If the media silence regarding ACORN didn't prove that I don't know what does. But regardless of how you feel about Fox, surely everyone can agree that free speech must be upheld in America. The Left has in fact sought to silence the voice of opposition through means such as reinstating the fairness doctrine which would destroy talk radio (ruled by the Right). Now the White House is considering a bailout for ailing print newspapers favorable to Obama. And if they weren't before the bailouts they sure as hell will be after.

Anyway, it ought to be beneath White House officials to attack any news outlet the way Anita Dunn did here. By the way, as long as we are discussing credibility, be sure to watch both videos. See what kind of vision Obama has for America. Wow! I mean, just wow!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AEt180Wnls

And here is an amazing quote not covered by anyone but Fox - un fucking real!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fi1zg2NOCn8

After watching the video, Google Moa tse tung

Number of deaths under Mao

The book opens with the sentence "Mao Tse-tung, who for decades held absolute power over the lives of one-quarter of the world's population, was responsible for well over 70 million deaths in peacetime, more than any other twentieth century leader." Chang and Halliday claim that he was willing for half of China to die to achieve military-nuclear superpowerdom. Estimates of the numbers of deaths during this period vary, though Chang and Halliday's estimate is one of the highest. Sinologist Stuart Schram, in a review of the book, noted that "the exact figure... has been estimated by well-informed writers at between 40 and 70 million".[6]
China scholars agree that the famine during the Great Leap Forward caused tens of millions of deaths. Chang and Halliday argue that this period accounts for roughly half of the 70 million total. An official estimate by Hu Yaobang in 1980 put the death toll at 20 million, whereas Philip Short in his 2000 book Mao: A Life found 20 to 30 million to be the most credible number. Chang and Halliday's figure is 37.67 million, which historian Stuart Schram indicated that he believes "may well be the most accurate."[7]
Professor R. J. Rummel published updated figures on world-wide democide in 2005, stating that he believed Chang and Halliday's estimates to be mostly correct and that he had revised his figures for China under Mao accordingly.[8]


____
 

Big P

Well-Known Member
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll


Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Email to a Friend ShareThis


The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 27% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty percent (40%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -13. That’s just a point above the lowest level ever recorded for this President. It’s also the sixth straight day in negative double digits, matching the longest such streak (see trends).

Just 31% of voters believe that Congress has a good understanding of the health care proposal.

Thirty-nine percent (39%) of Republicans have a favorable opinion of their party’s national chairman, Michael Steele.

The Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who Strongly Disapprove from the number who Strongly Approve. It is updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily e-mail update). Updates also available on Twitter and Facebook.

Overall, 47% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President's performance. Fifty-three percent (53%) disapprove.
The New Jersey Governor’s race remains a toss-up. Over the past week, both Jon Corzine and Chris Christie lost ground while support independent candidate Chris Daggett grew and so did the number of undecideds. Republicans hold a five-point advantage on the Generic Congressional Ballot.In Illinois,the race for Barack Obama’s Senate seat is a toss-up.
Rasmussen Reports is growing.We’re pleased to report that John Troyan has joined our team as a Sales Manager, Debra Falk is our new Director of Communications, and Alex Napoliello is a new Website Administrator. The talent and experience of our new team members will help us get the public and the media the information they need, when and how they need it, while extending the reach of our brand and our portfolio of services.
(More Below)

Support for the health care plan proposed by the President and Congressional Democrats is down to 42%. Fifty-four percent (54%) are opposed.

Scott Rasmussen has recently had three analysis columns published in the Wall Street Journal. The most recent was on health care. Earlier columns were on the President's approval ratings and how Obama won the White House by campaigning like Ronald Reagan. If you'd like Scott Rasmussen to speak at your meeting, retreat, or conference, contact Premiere Speakers Bureau. You can also learn about Scott's favorite place on earth or his time working with hockey legend Gordie Howe.

It is important to remember that the Rasmussen Reports job approval ratings are based upon a sample of likely voters. Some other firms base their approval ratings on samples of all adults. President Obama's numbers are always several points higher in a poll of adults rather than likely voters. That's because some of the President's most enthusiastic supporters, such as young adults, are less likely to turn out to vote.
(More Below)

About our Polling
Rasmussen Reports has been a pioneer in the use of automated telephone polling techniques, but many other firms still utilize their own operator-assisted technology (see methodology).

Pollster.com founder Mark Blumenthal noted that “independent analyses from the National Council on Public Polls, the American Association for Public Opinion Research, the Pew Research Center, the Wall Street Journal and FiveThirtyEight.com have all shown that the horse-race numbers produced by automated telephone surveys did at least as well as those from conventional live-interviewer surveys in predicting election outcomes.”

Additionally, an analysis by Pollster.com partner Charles Franklin “found that despite identically sized three-day samples, the Rasmussen daily tracking poll is less variable than Gallup.” During Election 2008, the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll was the least volatile of all those tracking the race. That stability is one reason that Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight.com said that the Rasmussen tracking poll “would probably be the one I'd want with me on a desert island."

A Fordham University professor rated the national pollsters on their record in Election 2008. We also have provided a summary of our results for your review. In 2008, Obama won 53%-46% and our final poll showed Obama winning 52% to 46%. While we were pleased with the final result, Rasmussen Reports was especially pleased with the stability of our results. On every single day for the last six weeks of the campaign, our daily tracking showed Obama with a stable and solid lead attracting more than 50% of the vote.

In 2004 George W. Bush received 50.7% of the vote while John Kerry earned 48.3%. Rasmussen Reports was the only firm to project both candidates’ totals within half a percentage point by projecting that Bush would win 50.2% to 48.5%. (see our 2004 results).

Daily tracking results are collected via telephone surveys of 500 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. The margin of sampling error—for the full sample of 1,500 Likely Voters--is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Results are also compiled on a full-week basis and crosstabs for full-week results are available for Premium Members.

Like all polling firms, Rasmussen Reports weights its data to reflect the population at large (see methodology). Among other targets, Rasmussen Reports weights data by political party affiliation using a dynamic weighting process. While partisan affiliation is generally quite stable over time, there are a fair number of people who waver between allegiance to a particular party or independent status. Over the past five years, the number of Democrats in the country has increased while the number of Republicans has decreased.

Our baseline targets are established based upon separate survey interviews with a sample of adults nationwide completed during the preceding three months (a total of 45,000 interviews) and targets are updated monthly. Currently, the baseline targets for the adult population are 37.2% Democrats, 32.7% Republicans, and 30.1% unaffiliated. Likely voter samples typically show a slightly smaller advantage for the Democrats.

A review of last week’s key polls is posted each Saturday morning. Other stats on Obama are updated daily on the Rasmussen Reports Obama By the Numbers page. We also invite you to review other recent demographic highlights from the tracking polls.
ShareThis

Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.
The Rasmussen Reports Election Edge™ Premium Service offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage available anywhere.
Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade.
 

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
Wanna know why nobody else covered that "quote" the way Fox did? Because they took it out of context.

Rick, you have SOME NERVE condemning Anita Dunn for quoting Mao, when earlier you PRAISED THE FUCKING UNABOMBER and called him a "genius".
 

doobnVA

Well-Known Member

Big P, Rasmussen is only ONE poll. It's the ONLY poll that shows Obama's approval rating DOWN right now. Scroll up a bit, I posted a screenshot of ALL THE CURRENT POLL NUMBERS. Out of 7, Rasmussen is the ONLY one that shows Obama's numbers being down.

Even the FOX NEWS poll has Obama gaining approval.

Here it is again:
 

Attachments

Big P

Well-Known Member
so what about you jeff, do you think if we did not have fox news that the media would be fair?
 

jeffchr

Well-Known Member
so what about you jeff, do you think if we did not have fox news that the media would be fair?
i don't believe Fox qualifies as news media if that is what you are implying

they're more like a psycho-babble rabble rousing ho-down show
 
Top