sloshedcookie
Active Member
nice grow mate and i was wondering at wot stages did u use big bloom and tiger bloom
HARVEST TIME!!! ( pics) !!!
- Thread starter scwascwa
- Start date
GrowTech
stays relevant.
majority of the replies to this thread were... 
anyways, my opinion... you grew that for you, harvest when you want. it looks like it's fine, and it will definitely get you high. so fuck what others say and think about your bud, half of them probably aren't even smoking their own right now
anyways, my opinion... you grew that for you, harvest when you want. it looks like it's fine, and it will definitely get you high. so fuck what others say and think about your bud, half of them probably aren't even smoking their own right now
ledgrowing
Well-Known Member
this is some funny shit im reading harvesting early does little for the high by harvesting early all u get is nasty tasting and smelling buds that are a waste of time and paper . genetics is were u pick your high mainly harvest time will change high a little due to the fact of thc production but the high is the same mainly just weaker. but even for a early harvest this is early trics should be min 15% amber to brown these look aprox 80% milky 20% clear to early period this is fact as stated in the medicinal horticulture bible for growing marijuana so there stop the fight smokers are peacful easy going people chill and puff puff passOkay, Ill keep going, you asked for it. What baseless assumptions? That you are not a scientist, and/or a connoisseur? You are right when you say I'm assuming(duh I don't know you, everything you say could be a lie, therefore everything I think about you is an assumption), but my assumptions are definitely based on what I draw from our on-going argument, so they are not baseless. Stop trying to sound smart, you're making a fool of yourself.
Clearly you don't understand that genetics are by far the most important factor, you are arguing this harvest time bullshit like its the only way to roll. Hmmm, seems I based my assumption on something there as well.
Please tell me when I stated it was a fact that I could read minds. Are you kidding? I didn't need to read your mind dude, you posted a link to what you thought was proof that you were right. Was that article from an encyclopedia...? no? Not facts. You clearly take what subcool says as fact because you have a crush on him, its obvious, stop trying to cover it up with this childish argument. Lets just be honest, you want subcool and you are pissed Jill has him. Why don't you ask your main squeeze sub if he thought this plant was harvested prematurely, I bet he thinks it was...
And what is all this hypocrisy nonsense? Please explainWhere do you come up with these wild allegations of yours?
Oh wait, is that the same as how I over analyze by harvesting when buds look done? Oh I think I follow your logic now... not.
TheDankness
Well-Known Member
Finally, somebody gets it.this is some funny shit im reading harvesting early does little for the high by harvesting early all u get is nasty tasting and smelling buds that are a waste of time and paper . genetics is were u pick your high mainly harvest time will change high a little due to the fact of thc production but the high is the same mainly just weaker. but even for a early harvest this is early trics should be min 15% amber to brown these look aprox 80% milky 20% clear to early period this is fact as stated in the medicinal horticulture bible for growing marijuana so there stop the fight smokers are peacful easy going people chill and puff puff pass
+Rep to you for being smart.
RanTyr
Active Member
Finally, somebody gets it.
Two people fail to understand my argument due to their inabilty to be objective about my argument. Fail.
TheDankness
Well-Known Member
I understand your argument man, I just don't agree with you. The buds on page one are premature, your argument gave me no reason to think otherwise. All you did was post some magazine article.
ledgrowing
Well-Known Member
look dude u are gullable simple dont listen tothe shit some people shovel your way in this forum there are a lot of posers who dont know shit andpretend like they do what i told u is fact i even gave u a book ref to check it out now drop it i dont care what u and your boyfriend subcool think your wrong and thats that. yes we fail to see your point cuz you dont have one sokiss-ass
RanTyr
Active Member
I do have a point. The point being maturity affects the high. This is a fact based on the cnd, cbd and thc maturity(edit: development would be a better word). This is fact and can be backed up by years of scientific study into marijuana.
My argument cannot be agreed or disagreed with. It's fact. Hence the reason why you had to change the argument into a genetics > maturity debate.