So,
following the current theme of the thread, to carry on: From what I've gathered, you theists don't seem to be able to 'play catch', at least where the burden of proof comes into play. I find this silly, especially when you insist on hinting that you have balls to join in on the fun. There is a parallel I'm noticing where 'Most' theists who are stubbornly smashing against a wall of misunderstanding have a reoccurring theme of close mindedness/unreasoning characteristics within what they present of themselves and what is said. So, Can I argue that the trick in comprehension at least where this pertains is being reasonable? I've been implying this the whole time, the fact that to not follow this deduction of logic is no different then an unreasonably fearful child in audience to there parents? All I ask as your circumstantially intellectual parent is you show me that there IS a boogie man. I will show you over and over that there is none, and will unfortunately I'm sure do so until you prove otherwise.
(I say circumstancially Intellectual parent in the sense that I am an audience you have drawn to and intend to prove your claims to. Last I checked there was no boogie man, said room was fine and you were sleeping. ergo, burden of proof.
)
Don't get this confused with me saying you'd do the later"( I will show you over and over that there is none, and will unfortunately I'm sure do so until you prove otherwise.)" I'm just saying another characteristic of being close minded and unreasonable is being stubborn. Heck, I'd be stubborn too if I literally thought as you. The trick is, I won't ever get to that point of certainty because I always employ reason and logic with an open mind.
'What is therein more probable?', I would say in your shoes to MY parents in this scenario. This question alone bares fruit; the exit to the never ending spiral I've noted above. Because, be it right or wrong, simply considering that question rather than not shows a mind of reasoning, question/which leads onto open mindedness and these only support the growth of not just logic, but properly formed logic at that. Hilariously enough right or wrong, it bares fruit to the qualities that bare fruit to the right answer in the first place.
Even if you don't get it, if you GET IT hell, second place is better then not being able to compete in the first place, and in this race, as long as you compete you get first prize anyways.
The hills can be steep.
