Higher Education
Well-Known Member
Thank you, I can always appreciate someone who wants to learn more!Yes I know I just realized that for the calvin cycle to even take place- first the light cycle has to occur lol. But I think you and Rick definitely both have a lot of good points and I'm really enjoying conversing the science of it with you
I am going to search my academic databases for some more studies that pertains to this matter when I have time Rick, being I am about to start school back myself. I wouldn't dismiss the credibility of mindphuck's article so quickly though. One academic study is less credible than five, but still credible. I doubt Dr. Clarke had any biases in his research about how he thinks cannabis should produce thc, that would be silly, and furthermore unintellectual of him.First, I would like to see the actual studies, how they were conducted and what the actual data was.
Second, I'm not suggesting turning off the lights before the buds are fully mature. I am suggesting allowing the buds to fully mature and then shutting them off for several days. I highly doubt runing a 10 hour light cycle as opposed to a 12 hour life cycle makes much difference in THC production.
One thing you always need to be careful of is citing a single study. In university science department there is a concept known as "publish or perish." This essentially means that if an aspiring professor wants his career to survive he had better come up with something to publish. Again, I would like to see for myself how those studies were conducted and what the actual data is. A lot of times a researcher will publish something calling it an "increase" but when reviewed it shows that the "increase was within the margin of error of the study.
What I observed (granted just with a 30x microscope) was a marked increase in the milky color of trichomes. The milky color is no doubt caused by the presence of something scattering light. Whether or not it's THC I don't know.
But, you could also do both. You could use additional UVB exposure up until harvest time and then flush the plants in the darkness. It seems unlikely to me that the plant will slam on the breaks with regard to THC production the moment the lights go out. That's kind of like saying the minute you stop eating your body begins muscle wasting. The plant will still have ATP stores that contain a significant amount of energy - I'd be willing to bet THC production is still possible.
But again, if light is so crucial to THC production wouldn't it be better to leave the lights on 24 hours a week before harvest?
Your suggestion of waiting for the buds to become fully mature, as opposed to starting the last week, intuitively seems problematic too. It seems as if once the buds have already fully matured then they would start declining. I don't see how the non-existence of light would interfere with this declination, being it's part of cannabis' natural life cycle.
Also, no one is implying that the light period is significantly more important than the dark period, just the fact that it is significant.