I don't get how someone can be so damn thick and not get it. It's funny, but also kinda sad.
As for the BC, I keep getting the feeling it's all a game that Obama's playing. I find it very difficult to believe that a presidential candidate who studied constitutional law would be so foolish as to think that his political opponents wouldn't look into his background and credentials, which he obviously can't keep secret forever (ESPECIALLY after watching McCain get his citizenship questioned first). I also find it difficult to believe that the democratic party would stake it's reputation on such a shaky, ill-thought out decision. Sneaking a constitutionally illegitimate candidate into the presidency seems to rank pretty low on the list of things you can get away with, to me at least. Also, the motive and reward for such an action always seems to be rooted in a giant shadowy conspiracy that would require the involvement of multiple officials and/or groups of officials. Oh, and don't forget the NWO involvement too. Either that, or he's an evil jihadist.
I think the BC is real and Obama knows it, he's just playing it out to his advantage. It's akin to children picking on each other. One holds his hands behind his back and says "I've got something cool that I'm not going to show you!", while the other kid tries to find out what it is. It doesn't matter what is hidden behind the child's back, if anything at all. It only matters that he's irritated the other child, who is now hell bent on finding out this "secret", and has become his sucker in the process.
The same applies here. Obama spends 2 million to keep his records sealed (which in comparison to something else that elicited such a reaction from the right, say, his campaign budget, is nothing) and the republicans go nuts over it because they ASSUME that because he doesn't want them to see it, it must have some really bad, juicy info on it. Obama then in turn gets to point at said nutty-ness and characterize it as a trait of a republican. He can perpetuate and inflame the matter almost as much as he wants by spending a little more and delaying the court dates more. And in the end, if the BC is revealed to be real, republican credibility would be shattered, and democrats would get to parade it around. All right in time for the 2010 elections even? I also believe this is why this issue has kinda died out on fox news, even though the case is still pending.
In summary, does it seem more logical to believe the giant conspiracy theory? Or is it more logical to believe that a politician is using a crude tactic to try and make his opponent look like a dick?
I'm sticking with the latter, but you never know.... sometimes truth is stranger than ficition.