Why doesn't Obam just release the birth certificate, if there is nothing to hide?

"
"Bush Lied" ?? Well, what do you say about this:

One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [the USA], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." - -
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
- Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,)
and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, ever significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real . "
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

Yea! It was ALL Bush's fault!!!
Only an inept loser thinks such a thing in light of all the evidence.

So Shut Your Festering Gob!
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
you are being hard.

you said "what if bush lied?".

dude, bush did lie.

that is ALL i was saying. i wasn't even taking sides.

enjoy your -rep. :fire:


:dunce:
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
-rep back:dunce::dunce: So you hate facts??? Thanks for the neg rep all because I showed you who lied MORE!!
you do NOT have neg rep power. sorry. :(



you still don't get it. it was a simple correction of a statement you made. go ahead and switch it all around to suit your rage though. :clap:
 
Obama has lied. Bush lied about what? WMD's??
Anything else?
As for the WMD's - I just showed you that everyone was lying well before he even got into office so....

What did Bush lie about????

Or was he and the world lied to??

Neg rep me for that?? Maybe you should SYFG!
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Obama has lied. Bush lied about what? WMD's??
Anything else?
As for the WMD's - I just showed you that everyone was lying well before he even got into office so....

What did Bush lie about????

Or was he and the world lied to??

Neg rep me for that?? Maybe you should SYFG!

i negative repped you for the names you called me when you still have NO CLUE what is going on. :roll:



dude, i am not trying to argue with you. just stop. it's embarrassing. :-P
 

ireaddd

Well-Known Member
man I feel people real good.. and his vibe aint good.. 2012-end of term, re-election or apperance of antichrist? ahhhh
 
I

Illegal Smile

Guest
So when Obama said if his stimulus package passed unemployment would not go above 8% was that a LIE? When he said his administration would be transparent was that a LIE? I could go on and on and those were truly false statements.

As for Bush, all the major intelligence services in the world agreed there were wmds in Iraq and in fact, weapons inspector David Kay said after the war that what he found, although not deployable wmds, was far more frightening because it showed a program much larger than anyone thought ready to be launched within months. If Saddam had been appeased and sanctions lifted, he would have had his wmds ready in months and the world would have seen a nuclear exchange in the middle east.
 
i negative repped you for the names you called me when you still have NO CLUE what is going on. :roll:



dude, i am not trying to argue with you. just stop. it's embarrassing. :-P
What a lib. Power to hurt those that show facts.

You- are the embarrasment fdd2blk!
Let everyone view this thread and see if a neg rep was called for. Nothing more than a simple little malicaskite who doen't like to be proven so bloody wrong!

The Democrates lied far more than one man.

But you can't stand to see, hear or read those facts can ya !
All radical libs are like this- 'hurt those that disagree with you!'

Neg rep me again? Fine... I'll take two!
That's more than worth it- providing facts that drive radical libs up the wall!

A neg rep for "Yea! It was ALL Bush's fault!!!
Only an inept loser thinks such a thing in light of all the evidence.
So Shut Your Festering Gob"

Maybe I should have just posted some 'bad letters' like... STFU instead...???
But you took the whole thing persoanlly even though you were not named PERSONALLY.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
That was my original stance until I began to look into why the 'Court' was stonewalling the suits- and then they claimed that is was not in there authority to remove him if the evidence was found to be lacking proof of US citizenship. They went on to say that only congress can remove him

To me thats a funny little side step around the law if I may say it that way. Why not just look into all the facts and then turn your legal opinion over to congress.

I think thats a 'simple english' way saying what they 'intend' to do.

Our problem is- the damage has already been done.

And, it Obama is found to be lacking citizenship- I think he shoule go to jail for a very long time.

He lied to the whole world and dry phucked every single American in this country. Libs might like that - but I don't.

What if it were bush who lied to the world and then .... did the same as Obama to the libs??? They would be screaming for his death.
"
"Bush Lied" ?? Well, what do you say about this:

One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [the USA], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." - -
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
- Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,)
and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, ever significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real . "
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

Yea! It was ALL Bush's fault!!!
Only an inept loser thinks such a thing in light of all the evidence.

So Shut Your Festering Gob!





you ask a question - "what if bush lied"

i said - "bush did lie"

you called me names.

i gave you negative rep.




pretty sure it was a perfect time to negative rep you. but you won't understand why.


:weed:







:weed:
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
What a lib. Power to hurt those that show facts.

You- are the embarrasment fdd2blk!
Let everyone view this thread and see if a neg rep was called for. Nothing more than a simple little malicaskite who doen't like to be proven so bloody wrong!

The Democrates lied far more than one man.

But you can't stand to see, hear or read those facts can ya !
All radical libs are like this- 'hurt those that disagree with you!'

Neg rep me again? Fine... I'll take two!
That's more than worth it- providing facts that drive radical libs up the wall!

A neg rep for "Yea! It was ALL Bush's fault!!!
Only an inept loser thinks such a thing in light of all the evidence.
So Shut Your Festering Gob"


Maybe I should have just posted some 'bad letters' like... STFU instead...???
But you took the whole thing persoanlly even though you were not named PERSONALLY.


this is twice now. the first one got you neg rep, this one got you an infraction.

personal attacks are not allowed.

:-P
 

Hayduke

Well-Known Member
Unless you do not mind getting some sort of spanking...I would think it is not a good idea to call a mod names (duh)...and I would say a little -rep is a very kind spanking...I mean do those points and bars really mean anything? At least he told you, and did not give -rep with no indication as from who or why...you totally deserved this little punishment!

Now if you do not mind the repercussions...have fun!

:leaf::peace::leaf:
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
i am not defending Obama.

i am not attacking bush.

i simply addressed 1 statement.

some people just love to argue.

i have A LOT of pot.

bongsmilie
 
Well, if the shoe fits... I'm just telling you 'it's not my size'. You can tell me the same thing.
One thing is certain- our battle is over. I think it unjust and you think it just. Such is life. Let other decide.

BACK TO THE POST:

I've heard over and over that 'Bush lied" when and if people were to check the pre-exsiting facts they would see that everyone was saying the smae thing. Even before he was in office; all the way back to the Clinton admin.
But.... it's Bush!!!! HE lied.

Well, that's odd in light of the facts. Bush lied about WMD's or has this changed? Oh, maybe everyone thinks he 'lied about something different....'. Like mission accomplished?
But what do most people think he lied about? The answer is WMD's and that is plan ignorence; stupid. Maybe even deliberate ignorence; again, in light of all the facts.

Obama lied to get into office and broken every campaing promise ever uttered.
He will go down as being the worst 1/2 white president this nation has every had.
He is also the worst example of Americas first 'black' president.

I know many other black men and women who are FAR more qualified than that empty suit.

But Obama is the perfect puppet for the 'One Worlders'.

A real black man would not be duped into working for the destruction of the US in so many ways as Obama has.
And he's not that much different than Bush, or Clinton is he?
 
I

Illegal Smile

Guest
Point of clarification: is calling someone a racist not name calling?
 
Top