What if it were bush who lied to the world and then .... did the same as Obama to the libs??? They would be screaming for his death.
since you can't remember your OWN WORDS, ...
What if it were bush who lied to the world and then .... did the same as Obama to the libs??? They would be screaming for his death.
-rep back So you hate facts??? Thanks for the neg rep all because I showed you who lied MORE!!you are being hard.
you said "what if bush lied?".
dude, bush did lie.
that is ALL i was saying. i wasn't even taking sides.
enjoy your -rep.
you do NOT have neg rep power. sorry.-rep back So you hate facts??? Thanks for the neg rep all because I showed you who lied MORE!!
Obama has lied. Bush lied about what? WMD's??
Anything else?
As for the WMD's - I just showed you that everyone was lying well before he even got into office so....
What did Bush lie about????
Or was he and the world lied to??
Neg rep me for that?? Maybe you should SYFG!
that's exactly how he rolls-rep back So you hate facts??? Thanks for the neg rep all because I showed you who lied MORE!!
What a lib. Power to hurt those that show facts.i negative repped you for the names you called me when you still have NO CLUE what is going on.
dude, i am not trying to argue with you. just stop. it's embarrassing.
That was my original stance until I began to look into why the 'Court' was stonewalling the suits- and then they claimed that is was not in there authority to remove him if the evidence was found to be lacking proof of US citizenship. They went on to say that only congress can remove him
To me thats a funny little side step around the law if I may say it that way. Why not just look into all the facts and then turn your legal opinion over to congress.
I think thats a 'simple english' way saying what they 'intend' to do.
Our problem is- the damage has already been done.
And, it Obama is found to be lacking citizenship- I think he shoule go to jail for a very long time.
He lied to the whole world and dry phucked every single American in this country. Libs might like that - but I don't.
What if it were bush who lied to the world and then .... did the same as Obama to the libs??? They would be screaming for his death.
"
"Bush Lied" ?? Well, what do you say about this:
One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [the USA], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." - -
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
- Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, ever significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real . "
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
Yea! It was ALL Bush's fault!!!
Only an inept loser thinks such a thing in light of all the evidence.
So Shut Your Festering Gob!
What a lib. Power to hurt those that show facts.
You- are the embarrasment fdd2blk!
Let everyone view this thread and see if a neg rep was called for. Nothing more than a simple little malicaskite who doen't like to be proven so bloody wrong!
The Democrates lied far more than one man.
But you can't stand to see, hear or read those facts can ya !
All radical libs are like this- 'hurt those that disagree with you!'
Neg rep me again? Fine... I'll take two!
That's more than worth it- providing facts that drive radical libs up the wall!
A neg rep for "Yea! It was ALL Bush's fault!!!
Only an inept loser thinks such a thing in light of all the evidence.
So Shut Your Festering Gob"
Maybe I should have just posted some 'bad letters' like... STFU instead...???
But you took the whole thing persoanlly even though you were not named PERSONALLY.
that's exactly how he rolls