Stoney McFried
Well-Known Member
Yeah, too bad I didn't write it, lol.
Epic win Stoney.
did ya know stoney is my hero.........
Epic win Stoney.
did ya know stoney is my hero.........
That's a very valid point. When is a plant a plant?Every seedling is a marijuana plant...right? Even the ones that are just on their 1st embryonic leaves.
we absolutely dont need more population that much im certain of.
we absolutely dont need more population that much im certain of.
Lay off the moonshine.wow! oh wonderess god of all knowledge can you please tell us what the ideal world population is. that way we can start knocking off people who go over YOUR limit.
just thinking out loud here but maybe stoning is a good way to kill all the "extras" should be the way to go....sorta like the old classic "the lottery". that way we dont emit any co2 into the air when the rifles go off.
i am diggin be a liberal. this is sorta fun...what time does the next sermon start?
answer the question, what is the ideal world population?Lay off the moonshine.
answer the question, what is the ideal world population?
you guys are the ones telling us there are too many people.
exactly how many is too many?
looks like we only have to kill 5.5 billion then. being as most of the worlds problems are coming from the middle east i suggest we start there.it all depends on what standard you accept on quality of life..
american standard = 1.5 billion
european = 4 billion
chinese = 7 billion
sudan = 15 billion
note that there are 7 billion alive right now...
"you guys"? Who does that refer to? Another generalization? I'm guessing you mean liberals again..answer the question, what is the ideal world population?
you guys are the ones telling us there are too many people.
exactly how many is too many?
...and looks like a pretty decent assessment to me. It all depends on how you live. The more people there are, the less quality of life for those that are here, as there will be more competition for resources. Seems like common sense to me.it all depends on what standard you accept on quality of life..
american standard = 1.5 billion
european = 4 billion
chinese = 7 billion
sudan = 15 billion
note that there are 7 billion alive right now...
]"you guys"? Who does that refer to? Another generalization? I'm guessing you mean liberals again..[/COLOR]
But lets just think about it, there are almost 7 Billion people alive today, and the number increases exponentially each year, meaning the rate at which the population increases is faster this year than last year, and next year it will be faster than this year. This trend has been constant throughout human history (except when catastrophe's happen, I think the black plague might have shifted the rate of increase, but I'm not sure, WW2 same deal).
more than half - that is 3.5 Billion people - live on less than $2/day. I just read a statistic yesterday that said 17% of people living in Yemen survived on less than $1.37/day last year.
Another statistic I've heard said if every person on the planet lived like an American, we would need 14 Earths to sustain it with the current population. So ginja's post is pretty relevant;
...and looks like a pretty decent assessment to me. It all depends on how you live. The more people there are, the less quality of life for those that are here, as there will be more competition for resources. Seems like common sense to me.
But it definitely doesn't have to be this way, and I'm not advocating limiting kids for couples or any of that. I'm advocating creating enormous food producing stations all over the country, then later all over the world. Let science advance and take the next step into mass agricultural production to feed the worlds population. I've got the plans and we've already got the means to accomplish that goal.
Guess what's holding us back... again?
https://www.rollitup.org/spirituality-sexuality-philosophy/252681-atheism-133.html
that is based on food production at the momentlooks like we only have to kill 5.5 billion then. being as most of the worlds problems are coming from the middle east i suggest we start there.
then we can cut off all medical supplies being sent to africa, south america, and canada...
bombing commences in 5, 4, 3....
you probably dont get it but most of the people reading your post are a little shocked right now.
Dude, you gotta find something to bitch about in every post I make don't you?1 uumm "you guys" yep libs...you got it
2 thanks for explaining what exponentially means. most of us had no idea...
3 conservatives like to call them farms. we have them "all over the country". you really should get out more. somebody already stole "your plan" and implemnted it a couple hundred years ago. this country alone produces enough food to feed over half the worlds population and currently feeds about one quarter of it.
the rest we BURN AS FUEL because "you guys" told us the earth has a fever which caused massive price increases of anything corn based. you might have read, it caused riots in struggling nations...remember THE POOR PEOPLE "YOU GUYS" CLAIM TO LOVE.
we have now officially entered the twilight zone.Dude, you gotta find something to bitch about in every post I make don't you?
I'm clearly not talking about farms jeff. And I'm also not claiming this idea is some groundbreaking innovation that'll change the course of human history... It (again) seems like common sense to me...
Build enormous structures miles high, yes, MILES high that support mass food production. Build them everywhere. Don't you think something like that would be a much better investment than going and wasting Billions per day on wars that kill innocent people?
The quote I bolded is probably the stupidest thing I've seen you post. That's so obviously false I can't even imagine how someone would think it's accurate.
(rofl at "a couple hundred years ago" - go check wiki and come back and tell me when agriculture got started...)
AMEN! This abortion business is ridiculous as well. These same anti-choice radicals are the first to throw a fit when any other perceived liberty or choice is taken away. We see through your pathos-riddled arguments. Everyone outside of the church does, so keep your kool-aid there, please.How about churches no longer being tax free if they want to try to dictate how tax dollars are spent?
Get out of here with this 'you guys' stuff. You're merely exposing your lack of education. Ever hear of false dilemma buddy? You get worse every day, so please take your fanaticism elsewhere. We don't want your pamphlets - we're tired of your bullhorn.1 uumm "you guys" yep libs...you got it
2 thanks for explaining what exponentially means. most of us had no idea...
3 conservatives like to call them farms. we have them "all over the country". you really should get out more. somebody already stole "your plan" and implemnted it a couple hundred years ago. this country alone produces enough food to feed over half the worlds population and currently feeds about one quarter of it.
the rest we BURN AS FUEL because "you guys" told us the earth has a fever which caused massive price increases of anything corn based. you might have read, it caused riots in struggling nations...remember THE POOR PEOPLE "YOU GUYS" CLAIM TO LOVE.
Say what?Get out of here with this 'you guys' stuff. You're merely exposing your lack of education. Ever hear of false dilemma buddy? You get worse every day, so please take your fanaticism elsewhere.We don't want your pamphlets - we're tired of your bullhorn.
He's on here screaming and name-calling all day, every day. He resorts to fallacy in an attempt to insult in every other post. I'm trying to goad him to calm down and engage in civilized discourse before he alienates everyone.Say what?