Giuliani: No terror attacks in U.S. under Bush

CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
Yes, you're not fooling anyone ... last poll has him now below 50% approval rating.

Only a fool thinks Obama has been strong on national security.

He's busy working on health care.... :roll:

Jobs will be for NEXT year ... :roll: 10% and that's a conservative figure.

Sell that crud somewhere else.

Carter has to be happy by now..... whew, finally out of last place.
 
jeffchr

jeffchr

Well-Known Member
actually things are going quite well for Obama on the national security front
a current CNN poll puts his approval rating at 57%

the Afghanistan war is starting to turn in our favor also. polls show the Afghani citizens' opinion of American troops is improving, and despite Mitch McConnell's recent lies, troop moral is up and the Generals are, for the first time, getting the equipment they have requested

Things are going better domestically under Obama also:





Obama will get re-elected.
 
BadDog40

BadDog40

Well-Known Member
CrackerJax said:
Yes, you're not fooling anyone ... last poll has him now below 50% approval rating.

Only a fool thinks Obama has been strong on national security.

He's busy working on health care.... :roll:

Jobs will be for NEXT year ... :roll: 10% and that's a conservative figure.

Sell that crud somewhere else.

Carter has to be happy by now..... whew, finally out of last place.
Click to expand...
Obama has been prez for 1 year, by the time GW had a year under him there were 3000 dead. Twist facts however it pleases but you lose. Why dont you just admit you would love to see another attack and thousands dead?
 
Dragline

Dragline

Well-Known Member
CrackerJax said:
Yes, you're not fooling anyone ... last poll has him now below 50% approval rating.

Only a fool thinks Obama has been strong on national security.

He's busy working on health care.... :roll:

Jobs will be for NEXT year ... :roll: 10% and that's a conservative figure.

Sell that crud somewhere else.

Carter has to be happy by now..... whew, finally out of last place.
Click to expand...
Only a fool would believe we had no terror attacks after 9/11 under Bush. My grandmother has alzheimers and hasn't even forgotten that. But yet you point out Ft. Hood and the panty bomber. Does your memory reset every year or what?
 
I

ilkhan

Well-Known Member
Obamas Foriegn policy
while not going far enouph and
seeming to me to be somewhat clumsy
Could be worse.

Obamas Fiscal policy
is what keeps me up at night.
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
First of all, the President doesn't move the stock market much, Congress does. Nooby.

As anyone with any economic experience will tell you is there is left over from one admin to the next.

Clinton gave us 9/11, and Bush gave us a war. Both have their own costs.

Unemployment is a better indicator of how policies are working..... and with Obama , they are NOT working. that's the whole point. He is busy spending with Congress, but no jobs are being created.

Bush's big fiscal problem was ... drum roll ... the same stupid Congress which is in their right now tanking the economy.

Bush's main fault was not fighting Congress, he just signed every idiotic bill which came his way (and still you all complained :roll:)

Let's face reality here.

Obama has no experience in the private sector, neither does much of his administration.

It shows..... everyone knows, especially our enemies.

Obama has been played the fool over and over again in foreign policy and ur right, it's only been a year. This has been a fantastic year ... if ur Iran, North Korea, Rssia, or China. They found a naive patsy and they have exploited him brilliantly.

Taxes have not even kicked in yet folks.... this is the calm before the storm.... you haven't seen anything yet.

I'm prepared...how about you? If you don't recognize what is coming ... you will be swept away.
 
I

Illegal Smile

Guest
Obama is turning out to be the best thing that has happened for the political right since Reagan.
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
I just want some balance.

I just want some experience.

I just want some security.

I just want tax money treated better than Monopoly money

I REALLY WANT A NEW CONGRESS.

Obama can stay and learn on the job I suppose, but Congress needs to go ASAP!
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
Keep sleeping and believing it's all the left/dem's fault...

You guys better stock up that bomb shelter!

Obama'll getcha!
 
T

tical916

Well-Known Member
What about the huge surplus we had when Clinton left office? Bush basically threw that down the shitter. While enacting more tax cuts for the rich and creating more terrorists by invading Iraq.

How did Clinton create 9/11? That is bullshit statement.

Yes I agree with you fully that congress is the main reason of all these problems. They barely work. Most of the time working is spent listening to congress tell ridiculous stories. We've all seen the thousands of graphs they pull out. "If you were take all the money thrown into this stimulus package, it'd wrap around the world 3 times. It would reach the moon." Congress is ran like it's a 5th grade science fair.

Not to mention that airhead Pelosi. I can't her head hasn't exploded after letting all that power get to her, not to mention the botox.

Finally the only Obama had a real chance to deal directly with terrorists. Was when the Somalia pirates hijacked that ship and took the captain hostage. And that turned out perfect, while the republicans were just waiting for him to fail.
 
jeffchr

jeffchr

Well-Known Member
tical916 said:
What about the huge surplus we had when Clinton left office? Bush basically threw that down the shitter. While enacting more tax cuts for the rich and creating more terrorists by invading Iraq.

How did Clinton create 9/11? That is bullshit statement.

Yes I agree with you fully that congress is the main reason of all these problems. They barely work. Most of the time working is spent listening to congress tell ridiculous stories. We've all seen the thousands of graphs they pull out. "If you were take all the money thrown into this stimulus package, it'd wrap around the world 3 times. It would reach the moon." Congress is ran like it's a 5th grade science fair.

Not to mention that airhead Pelosi. I can't her head hasn't exploded after letting all that power get to her, not to mention the botox.

Finally the only Obama had a real chance to deal directly with terrorists. Was when the Somalia pirates hijacked that ship and took the captain hostage. And that turned out perfect, while the republicans were just waiting for him to fail.
Click to expand...
facts don't matter - it's more about the status quo and opposition to any kind of intelligent and meaningful change.

conservatives are becoming a minority. they can whine and bitch all day, but change is definitely coming. i hope they do go hide out in their paranoid, anachronistic little shelter prisons surrounded by their guns and archaic principles.
 
tebor

tebor

Well-Known Member
change is the problem.
Whats wrong with the constitution?
we should have never changed in the first place.

I can't see the difference between Obama and bush 2 and Clinton and Bush 1
they are all guilty of treason.
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
There was no real surplus...it is always consumed by the national debt. Why did the BUDGET surplus happen? Because Clinton was prevented from spending it via his health care run.

How did the surplus even take place? It had NOTHING to do with the Clinton Administration that's for sure. It was called the TECH BUBBLE and Clinto was lucky enough to be present when it rose, that's all. It has nothing to do with his governance.

What he did do was ignore the tough problems in exchange for popularity, which was always his weakness, pride. And then we get 9/11.
 
doc111

doc111

Well-Known Member
CrackerJax said:
There was no real surplus...it is always consumed by the national debt. Why did the BUDGET surplus happen? Because Clinton was prevented from spending it via his health care run.

How did the surplus even take place? It had NOTHING to do with the Clinton Administration that's for sure. It was called the TECH BUBBLE and Clinto was lucky enough to be present when it rose, that's all. It has nothing to do with his governance.

What he did do was ignore the tough problems in exchange for popularity, which was always his weakness, pride. And then we get 9/11.
Click to expand...
This seems to be something that libs and Clinton supporters/G W Bush haters always conveniently forget about. We were well on our way into a recession when Clinton was leaving office. By the time Bush took over we were well into the recession which was worsened by the 9/11 attacks. :bigjoint:
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
Yes, The same spending arse Congress, coupled with liberal economics ... rode that bubble right into the ground. Cali had massive surpluses.... and they promptly blew it all, and then some. Now they are here with their hand out saying it's not their fault. the heck it isn't. Take that last bit of taxpayer money and buy a mirror.

Now, by the way Obama has just given an UNLIMITED credit line to Fred & Fannie Mac ...... I'm telling you all, if you aren't at least 45 years old ... U R so going to get screwed. U will have a much harder life now .... they are spending ur future right now.

Wake up.....
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
CrackerJax said:
There was no real surplus...it is always consumed by the national debt. Why did the BUDGET surplus happen? Because Clinton was prevented from spending it via his health care run.

How did the surplus even take place? It had NOTHING to do with the Clinton Administration that's for sure. It was called the TECH BUBBLE and Clinto was lucky enough to be present when it rose, that's all. It has nothing to do with his governance.

What he did do was ignore the tough problems in exchange for popularity, which was always his weakness, pride. And then we get 9/11.
Click to expand...


Spin the shit however you want Cracker.

"...which was always his weakness, pride. "

Speak for yourself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top