Oh Goodie! ... More on 911 (inside job) :)

[mexiblunt]

Thanks. I was unsure the difference, so that means bush/cheney took the fifth? Did the crashers refuse to show unless they were together and not under oath?

 

[fdd2blk]

Thanks. I was unsure the difference, so that means bush/cheney took the fifth? Did the crashers refuse to show unless they were together and not under oath?

i do not know. i do know it all comes back to who your lawyers are.

 

[Big P]

Thanks. I was unsure the difference, so that means bush/cheney took the fifth? Did the crashers refuse to show unless they were together and not under oath?

no they did not plead the fifth they just said they will not be under oath because of executive privilege and there are secerts they cannot speak about


and seeing the huge frothing of the deamoncrats who would have had lawyers badger them with differnetly worded questions and activly trying to trick them or to catch them in any type of slight perjery to be used for political purposes like they did to clinton


its like a gotcha game that they refused to expose themselves too because of good advise form thier lawyers


i would not walk into a den of wolves with my junk out either

 

[Hayduke]

the question is, "do you really believe they couldn't have?"

I believe that it is possible, however I do not believe we are being told the whole truth.

Ok all you tough guys...go copy and paste something insulting...it will make you feel much better

 

[Katatawnic]

and seeing the huge frothing of the deamoncrats who would have had lawyers badger them with differnetly worded questions and activly trying to trick them or to catch them in any type of slight perjery to be used for political purposes like they did to clinton

The Democrats weren't the ones that went after Clinton; you got that one bassackwards. I wouldn't put it past either side, though. Hypocrisy abound everywhere we go.

 

[CrackerJax]

Clinton gave as good as he got with trickiness.

"It depends on what your definition of the word "is" is" ... That's the mother of all evasiveness.

 

[Katatawnic]

Clinton was the only one who thought he was actually being evasive.

 

[CrackerJax]

Now that's an ego.

When a President (who is a lawyer by the way) lies to a grand Jury, the country is in trouble.

Thank G*D that man is out of office. A low point in American history.

hey Kat, you might enjoy this....

[youtube]JahdnOQ9XCA[/youtube]

 

[Katatawnic]

LOL! Thanks, that was my first giggle of the day!

 

[Tomacriderx]

It was the JEWS. Go to "Prothink.org".

 

[GrowRebel]

how's this thread working for you?
you've gotten nowhere.
i'm not offended.

It's working out better than I thought ... your opinion of our progress is of no consequence ... glad to hear you are not offended.

7) Theory of Agency rather than Process. For the conspiracist, there are no coincidences.

Of course you can't dispute the facts presented in this thread so you have no other choice but to side track the issue ... how's that working out for ya?

9/11 was not an inside job grow rebel, your swallowing this stuff hook line and sinker, somtimes you have to spit buddy

Say's you ... which means nothing ... but the FACT remains that most people don't buy the government lie ... the fact that you can't handle that is something you will have to work out ....

this video cannot be disproven

It already has, the NIST report was proven bogus long ago ... no one claims fire can't melt steel ... but there is scientific proof that the fire never got hot enough to melt steel ... so this is just more bogus info you love to use to side step the obvious ... how's that working out for ya? ...

I expect a full report on this in the morning GrowRe

Yeah ... and the report is ... you got nothing ... your info doesn't even have the source links and you are expected to be found credible ... sorry ... you're not ...

you forgot to explain "the bowing', just like they said you would.

Bowing still causes resistance ... you forgot to explain that ...

why do you guys keep saying they did not find any wreckage thats a complete lie:

There are far too many lies ... that's why we will continue to push for a real investigation ... to bad you can't handle that ...

 

[Keenly]

if its so big of a lie there was no plane wreckage at the pentagon or in the field in Pen. then lets see some pictures?


lets see some boeing debris big P, your going to have a hard time finding plane wreckage pictures at either location because, guess what, there was none

good luck, your going to need it..


i want to see, an engine, or a tail . wing section, or a passengers seat, or some luggage... show me SOMETHING that proves without a doubt it was a plane crash...

you cant, because such evidence does not exist...

inside job

 

[Big P]

if its so big of a lie there was no plane wreckage at the pentagon or in the field in Pen. then lets see some pictures?


lets see some boeing debris big P, your going to have a hard time finding plane wreckage pictures at either location because, guess what, there was none

good luck, your going to need it..


i want to see, an engine, or a tail . wing section, or a passengers seat, or some luggage... show me SOMETHING that proves without a doubt it was a plane crash...

you cant, because such evidence does not exist...

inside job

keenly i posted the video showing the wreckage twice now, which also tears to shreds several other claims you guys been making

if you cant read my posts its not my fault


Next!!!!

 

[Big P]

It's working out better than I thought ... your opinion of our progress is of no consequence ... glad to hear you are not offended.


Of course you can't dispute the facts presented in this thread so you have no other choice but to side track the issue ... how's that working out for ya?


Say's you ... which means nothing ... but the FACT remains that most people don't buy the government lie ... the fact that you can't handle that is something you will have to work out ....


It already has, the NIST report was proven bogus long ago ... no one claims fire can't melt steel ... but there is scientific proof that the fire never got hot enough to melt steel ... so this is just more bogus info you love to use to side step the obvious ... how's that working out for ya? ...

Yeah ... and the report is ... you got nothing ... your info doesn't even have the source links and you are expected to be found credible ... sorry ... you're not ...


Bowing still causes resistance ... you forgot to explain that ...



There are far too many lies ... that's why we will continue to push for a real investigation ... to bad you can't handle that ...

lol rebel took you a week to come up with that weak retort?


you cant reply to any point and i have disproven almost every won lol



your world in crumbling around you

NEXT!!!!!!!

 

[NoDrama]

You can explain a coincidence away, but how do you explain away hundreds?

 

[Tomacriderx]

prothink.org

The Jews did 9/11

 

[fdd2blk]

if its so big of a lie there was no plane wreckage at the pentagon or in the field in Pen. then lets see some pictures?


lets see some boeing debris big P, your going to have a hard time finding plane wreckage pictures at either location because, guess what, there was none

good luck, your going to need it..


i want to see, an engine, or a tail . wing section, or a passengers seat, or some luggage... show me SOMETHING that proves without a doubt it was a plane crash...

you cant, because such evidence does not exist...

inside job

if it was an inside job the first thing they would have done would have been to "PLANT DEBRI". and LOTS of it.

 

[CrackerJax]

No matter how many logical examples are given ... the "truthers" cannot admit it. Then their importance (self) would shatter.

 

[Miss MeanWeed]

To add fuel to the fire, I remember in an issue of Nexus Magazine from around late 2000, in one section of the magazine called 'The Twilight Zone', where they publish harder-to-believe-than-normal conspiracy news , there was an interview with a 'secret agent' who said there was a major 'catastrophic event' being planned for Manhatten come late 2001.

Some will claim this as printed foreknowledge of 9/11 and will help solidify their beliefs, and others will see it as the one out of a million quack-job predictions that was right.

Anyway, it's a fairly accurate forecast of bygone events printed about a year before 9/11, more direct and actual than the Alex Jones 'prediction'.

 

[wyteboi]

you cant reply to any point and i have disproven almost every won lol

you have not "disproven" anything. You simply posted utubes with theories .....just like we do. We have posted hundreds of coincidences and you have posted a couple of nice debates, and I thank you for that, but its far from being proof. I have plenty of questions you have not answered , plenty of video's you have not responded to, and that dont make you stupid , or crazy , it just means you do not know the answers and none of us do, so i think a real investigation is in order................it wont happen , but i still think it should. As long as you are reading the questions , then thats all we can do, so in the future if either of us is wrong we will remember why.
fdd my opinion on the plantin debris thing is that the media is far more powerful then a few pics of a plane or something.

wb