RickWhite
Well-Known Member
Any time people discuss a Government option for health care or anything else, there is a 600lb gorilla in the room that nobody wants to discuss.
That 600lb gorilla is the reality of race based hiring quotas in Government hiring and contracting along with all the other regulation regarding minimum wage, drug testing and much more.
http://library.findlaw.com/1999/Jan/1/241470.html
Now, before closing your mind and going Liberal on me, consider the ramifications of these policies.
To most, it is quite clear that a performance problem is created when employees are hired for reasons other than their ability to get the job done. Nowhere is this more evident than in Government hiring.
The TSA (airport sreeners) are an excellent example. Though we must pay them a high wage due to Government regulation, they are usually not the best people for the job because they are not hired on this basis - they are hired largely because of their race. The same is true with the DMV, the post office and just about any other entity that depends on Federal funds.
Not only do Government jobs (direct or through contract) carry race based quotas that create this problem, but they also make it difficult to fire the particularly bad employees due to red tape.
And the wages we must pay these poorly performing employees is artificially inflated through Government regulation such as the Davis-Bacon act.
http://www.dol.gov/compliance/laws/comp-dbra.htm
So, when we consider the reality of socialized medicine and we look at other Countries as examples of working systems, we also must consider whether or not these Countries have similar policies and challenges.
Consider the fact that health insurance companies employ millions of people and they have massive operating expenses of their own aside from what they pay out in claims. This amounts to a vast bureaucratic system even in the most efficient of them.
How much worse will it be when the massive office buildings occupied by companies such as BCBS are filled with poorly performing, apathetic Government employees who can not be fired and who earn artificially inflated wages and far better benefits than those they manage? And they recieve all of this regardless of their performance. They can be as lazy, incompitant, apathetic, inept and unprofessional as they desire and their pay and their job will remain uneffected.
I am not familiar with the Government hiring practices in France, but something tells me they do not face the same challenges we do here. I for one, cringe when I am forced to deal with incompitance and apathy. I can not imagine having to deal with this in order to recieve medical treatment and I refuse to put in the hands of such people decissions regarding my health and well being. in my mind, only a fool would choose to do so.
I now open the floor to charges of bigotry and a racism that I know will be forthcoming.
That 600lb gorilla is the reality of race based hiring quotas in Government hiring and contracting along with all the other regulation regarding minimum wage, drug testing and much more.
http://library.findlaw.com/1999/Jan/1/241470.html
Now, before closing your mind and going Liberal on me, consider the ramifications of these policies.
To most, it is quite clear that a performance problem is created when employees are hired for reasons other than their ability to get the job done. Nowhere is this more evident than in Government hiring.
The TSA (airport sreeners) are an excellent example. Though we must pay them a high wage due to Government regulation, they are usually not the best people for the job because they are not hired on this basis - they are hired largely because of their race. The same is true with the DMV, the post office and just about any other entity that depends on Federal funds.
Not only do Government jobs (direct or through contract) carry race based quotas that create this problem, but they also make it difficult to fire the particularly bad employees due to red tape.
And the wages we must pay these poorly performing employees is artificially inflated through Government regulation such as the Davis-Bacon act.
http://www.dol.gov/compliance/laws/comp-dbra.htm
So, when we consider the reality of socialized medicine and we look at other Countries as examples of working systems, we also must consider whether or not these Countries have similar policies and challenges.
Consider the fact that health insurance companies employ millions of people and they have massive operating expenses of their own aside from what they pay out in claims. This amounts to a vast bureaucratic system even in the most efficient of them.
How much worse will it be when the massive office buildings occupied by companies such as BCBS are filled with poorly performing, apathetic Government employees who can not be fired and who earn artificially inflated wages and far better benefits than those they manage? And they recieve all of this regardless of their performance. They can be as lazy, incompitant, apathetic, inept and unprofessional as they desire and their pay and their job will remain uneffected.
I am not familiar with the Government hiring practices in France, but something tells me they do not face the same challenges we do here. I for one, cringe when I am forced to deal with incompitance and apathy. I can not imagine having to deal with this in order to recieve medical treatment and I refuse to put in the hands of such people decissions regarding my health and well being. in my mind, only a fool would choose to do so.
I now open the floor to charges of bigotry and a racism that I know will be forthcoming.