P
PadawanBater
Guest
How did it go from an "excellent learning tool" to what it is today in 40 years?Oh shit, did I miss the start of Texas Bashing Day?
The reason that textbooks are influenced by Texas didn't start out about the size of the school system here. It was about the high standards that Texas USED TO HAVE in its schools. When a textbook was approved by the TEA is was an excellent learning tool.
Sorry to ramble off topic, but short and sweet: If your state wants to teach different material than Texas, go ahead. Make sure your educational boards pick up the slack and do what they have relied on Texas to do for them for the past 40 years.
It's a little more complicated than that... A big part of the nation purchases textbooks from Texas, it's about national educational standards in place, states don't get to just teach what they want to teach on an individual basis, they're required to teach similar material, if not identical.
Do you guys not have an issue with the material this article in the OP details?!
The COMPLETE REMOVAL of the nations 3rd president, the author of the Declaration of Independence..!
Emphasis on the successful campaign of Joseph McCarthy and the infiltration of the communists into the American gov.???
How would you feel if she had an atheist symbol instead?BTW, I went to my kid's school the other day. The principle has a bible and a cross in her office. And I like it.
The term "God," or "Creator," or "God of Nature," is NOT Christian. These terms fit all religions from Jewish to Muslim and all in between.
I am in possession of the Constitution and Bill of Rights for the old Soviet Union. The Soviet citizen had WAY more rights enumerated in their Constitution than we have in ours. The difference was, their rights came from the government, and as such, the government could take them away at will ... and they did. Our country was founded upon the principle that rights are God given. They are innate just because we are human. That's why they are called "Human Rights."
What comes to mind at this point is the "right" to health care. Health care is a good, and or, a service. Food is a good. Shelter is a good. There can be no innate right to goods and services. The only way to receive these so called "rights" is for government to violate the property rights of one citizen in order to give these "rights" to another citizen. How can theft, and receiving stolen property be deemed a "right"?
We have the Natural Rights to Life, Liberty and Property. The only legitimate function of government is to protect those rights ... and nothing more. When the government swerves from that premise, tyranny prevails.
The above has been conveniently white-washed from our history books. In order to regain and preserve liberty, this must be taught again in our schools. Texas has taken the first step, and whatever Texas textbooks contain, will also be contained in the textbooks in California and other states as well. About time!
Dude, go back and answer my questions. You didn't answer a single thing.