The Insanity of the Left

[Mr.KushMan]

I could respond with a long discourse and remove any form of coherence from your point-by-point critique of my reasoning, but I feel as though I articulated my self clearly enough to let an aware individual be able to pick up the pieces. You my friend are helplessly confined to the right-left paradigm and I hope you find your way out with some modest amount of self-esteem. You really have problems with most of my points, if not all of them, maybe you got tired? However you don't propose any facts of your own, just that you went to college and your feelings on socialism.

If you know economics, you know that banking is inherently a socialist system. Do some reading otherwise.

Just to clear things up, I don't think that a cancer cure is being intentionally with held from the public, but the health care industry has no reason to release a cure.

From what I can observe you are merely here to say I am wrong, while lending credence to my proposal that intellect = cooperation, and ignorance = denial.

As well an institution is set up to do one thing, keep itself in place. This includes your public institution, a high level a cronyism runs rampant through your country to keep profits flowing. Politicians not having a limit on receivable campaign donations, and politicians receiving donations on years they aren't running for office. If you want to see the truth its out there, but its scary and much more serene to keep your head in the dirt.

There is a phrase used in ancient roman courts meaning, "who stands to gain?" Use your knowledge wisely and you will see true happiness.

Peace

 

[RickWhite]

I could respond with a long discourse and remove any form of coherence from your point-by-point critique of my reasoning, but I feel as though I articulated my self clearly enough to let an aware individual be able to pick up the pieces. You my friend are helplessly confined to the right-left paradigm and I hope you find your way out with some modest amount of self-esteem. You really have problems with most of my points, if not all of them, maybe you got tired? However you don't propose any facts of your own, just that you went to college and your feelings on socialism.

If you know economics, you know that banking is inherently a socialist system. Do some reading otherwise.

Just to clear things up, I don't think that a cancer cure is being intentionally with held from the public, but the health care industry has no reason to release a cure.

From what I can observe you are merely here to say I am wrong, while lending credence to my proposal that intellect = cooperation, and ignorance = denial.

As well an institution is set up to do one thing, keep itself in place. This includes your public institution, a high level a cronyism runs rampant through your country to keep profits flowing. Politicians not having a limit on receivable campaign donations, and politicians receiving donations on years they aren't running for office. If you want to see the truth its out there, but its scary and much more serene to keep your head in the dirt.

There is a phrase used in ancient roman courts meaning, "who stands to gain?" Use your knowledge wisely and you will see true happiness.

Peace

Honestly, you sound like an ignoramus who suffers from Asperger's Syndrome and are therefore posting a bunch of gibberish. It is nearly impossible to respond with specifics because your ramblings are so inane and incoherent that they fail to constitute points that are intelligible enough to respond to. Do your self a favor and stop trying to use language and terms that are above your ability. Several of your sentences contain terms that are used improperly and their improper construction makes them sound downright schizophrenic.

For instance, you do not "respond with a long discourse." Discourse is what we are already having. You would "respond at length." And one would not "remove any form of coherence" from another's argument. That sentence doesn't make any sense. Coherence simply means that a person's argument remains on point from beginning to end.

It is abundantly clear that you are trying to pretend you are something you are not. maybe you believe you are a great and wise scholar who knows a lot about the world, but clearly you are just an overly opinionated kid who mistakes his own ignorance for genius.

 

[Mr.KushMan]

Yeah...cause you know, coins don't have two sides.

Peace

 

[Merowe]

RickWhite:

On correct usage for 'discourse' you are mistaken. 'Discourse' can be both a verb and a noun. One can discourse upon a matter - verb - or have a discourse upon a matter - noun. A dictionary will confirm this.