mindphuk
Well-Known Member
What exactly did you expect?You see what i didnt want to do was get into a throw and catch session,
i throw information and you throw information back and it goes on and on.
Not quite sure what you mean by intelligent alien functions and systems. Unless mutations occur in the germ cells (ovum and sperm in sexually reproducing beings), the traits that mutations change will not be passed down.since with my limited knowledge and ur vast background and academic achievements maybe you can shed a bit more light on this subject for me to have a better understanding, your talking about mutation, and in my stone age knowledge i thought that there is no reason or evidence that a simple single cell could or would be able to initiate any type of development of intelligent alien functions and systems and certainly not by accidental error, no matter the length of period of time.
Most mutations are either harmful or neutral. There are certainly some that are beneficial. Examples of new function would be the nylonase producing bacteria that is the result of a change in the genome (apparently a frame shift mutation but that is still debated) to create an enzyme that can digest a synthetic product that has only existed since the 1930's. We have found close to 500 frame shift mutations in humans as compared to chimpanzees.And all the observable evidence of genetic copying errors and mutations does not do anything in the adding intelligent or alien department but rather produces clear defects and harmful growth.
Has there been up till this moment in time any observation of mutations within an organism that starts to create a new alien biological element or function?
i wanted to approach this from a different point with something that is new and not an old debate thats why im holding out on any proofs or evidences. im not here to prove you wrong or to be right and throw old news, i simply have new{new to you and the others anyway} information that i thought i should present, and you can estimate it at any value or in any way.
we are all researching and coming to conclusions arnt we?
I already discussed this in my first reply to you, did you read it? Every discipline in science is subject to modification when new evidence comes to light. This is not a liability, it is what makes science so strong. Mistakes get weeded out in favor of better or more complete ideas. Newton was generally correct on his mechanics of motion but Einstein showed it was incomplete and that Newtonian equations were wrong at velocities approaching the speed of light and strong gravity. Newtonian physics wasn't overturned but was updated and refined to cover situations that Newton never observed. Darwin had to be updated to include the new science of genetics, which added some twists but basically confirmed and supported natural selection. Every new discovery has a chance to falsify a scientific theory but when 150 years go by and every new piece of evidence supports a theory rather than falsifies it, the theory becomes even stronger with a higher level of confidence.The problem with darwins theory and all the other big names in the show is that it always has to adjust to try and stay dry and to me anything that can change direction and shift once is untrustworthy.
Where are you going with these questions?I wont get into another one ill get onto my point quick.
simple English questions and no need for long and complicated play it safe questions, this isnt a mouse trap.
1-Do you think the truth is always concealed by governments/ groups etc..? Not always but generally if it will benefit them enough and they think they can get away with it.
2-If i got a machine that no one has tested before and no one has seen, and asked who do you think can explain to you this type of machine and its function? Probably a committee of engineers, scientist, metallurgists, etc. depending on what the machine appears to comprise of. Who would you ask?
3-if you want to ask a question about a subject where do you go?
lets say you want to ask about making a cake, where do you go to? barber? shoe maker? no you go to a chef or a cake factory right? if you agree on this then ill move on
Depends on the subject. I don't suggest going to bible thumping creationists to get information on Darwinian evolution just as I wouldn't ask an atheist scientist to tell me about Jesus and scripture.
i hope you understand the simple English im speaking.