While I cannot dispute the facts of your post, the conclusions are not altogether correct. The problem with this theory of yours is actually quite simple. In large scale agriculture it is much more expensive to grow organically. The niche that organic farmers enjoy is based largely on their ability to provide delicious food. The can focus more on this purpose, and they also can charge very high prices for thier crops in comparison to chemical based "super farms"
Growing pot is different, people can grow better, stronger, bigger dope with high tech formulas. That's not to say that organics aren't cool, and I'm not telling anyone not to grow this way, but it isnt superior in any measurable way, including TASTE. Comparing Rieter Ice Cream to Ben and Jerrys, yeah sure B&J's is going to blow it away in any sort of taste test, but that's Ben and Jerry's niche, they also can command 4 dollars a pint! Now what if the were not limited to using only natural ingrediesnts, and earth friendly processes, BUT STILL HAD THE SAME DEVOTION TO QUALITY? You see what I'm getting at here? Growing organically is a decision someone makes because of what they put in their bodies, or what they put out into the enviorment. In this dau and age of super hydo/aero gardening, and addtives for everything, chems would win, even a taste test when done expertly. i know old timers have a hard time with that, but it's true, and I've seen it over and over first hand. Organic growing is more like a persnal coice, a statement, being more natural, observing more than controlling. It's really awesome, but organics is not superior in any way. In fact with the same expert grow skill a modern aeroponic, chemical using farmer could wipe the floor with an organic grower of the same skill. Organic growing is about more than that, and I hate when people get confused about it.
