Ron Paul vs. Hillary Clinton

[threatlevelorange]

A show of hands...

Ron Paul or Hillary Clinton?

Your answers will be anonymous. Feel free to conduct research before voting.

 

[Wavels]

Interesting...I would have thought that on a cannabis site we would see more support for the smartest woman in the known universe???

 

[VictorVIcious]

You would see support for the smartest women in the known Universe. Unfortunately she isn't running for the office. lol VV

 

[threatlevelorange]

You would see support for the smartest women in the known Universe. Unfortunately she isn't running for the office. lol VV

LMAO!!!! oh man what sharp shooter!

 

[threatlevelorange]

I guess we know who voted for Hill's Pills on this site. This is the same person that told me there would be overwhelming support for her in another thread. I said "ok lets put up a poll." So far not many are voting, but that one vote will get washed out by more Paul votes in just a matter of time.

 

[medicineman]

I guess we know who voted for Hill's Pills on this site. This is the same person that told me there would be overwhelming support for her in another thread. I said "ok lets put up a poll." So far not many are voting, but that one vote will get washed out by more Paul votes in just a matter of time.

Care to name names?~LOL~. BTW, why are you, a neo-con supporter of bush's policies, voting for a man that would bring the troops home from around the globe. Seems like an oxymoron to me.

 

[Miracle Smoke]

I believe there is some confusion here if im not mistaken?

.....whaaat?

 

[SoloGro57]

Even if he can't win (he can), voting for Ron Paul sends a message to the people who have been running the show without any respect for the wishes of those they were elected to represent.

What's the message voting for Paul sends? We're sick of the status quo.

They only way things are ever going to change is to let them know that we are watching, that we care about what's going on, and that we're willing to vote to change the situation.

Voting is the only thing that gets their attention. Vote because if you don't, they think you're happy with what's going on, and they'll keep lining their pockets with the profits they make for themselves, their friends and their true constituents, the corporate lobbyists.

Vote in the primaries. Vote for Ron Paul. Send a message they'll pay attention to.

 

[medicineman]

Even if he can't win (he can), voting for Ron Paul sends a message to the people who have been running the show without any respect for the wishes of those they were elected to represent.

What's the message voting for Paul sends? We're sick of the status quo.

They only way things are ever going to change is to let them know that we are watching, that we care about what's going on, and that we're willing to vote to change the situation.

Voting is the only thing that gets their attention. Vote because if you don't, they think you're happy with what's going on, and they'll keep lining their pockets with the profits they make for themselves, their friends and their true constituents, the corporate lobbyists.

Vote in the primaries. Vote for Ron Paul. Send a message they'll pay attention to.

Yeah, Ralph Nader got some peoples attention, enough to shove the vote to Bush, or make it at least feasable that he coluld have won. I hope if he doesn't win the primaries,(Not a chance), he splits the republican party into pieces.

 

[threatlevelorange]

Care to name names?~LOL~. BTW, why are you, a neo-con supporter of bush's policies, voting for a man that would bring the troops home from around the globe. Seems like an oxymoron to me.

Marx Marx Marx....

Where have I EVER stated that I fully support Bush? I don't even know how many times I've criticized him on this forum. Naturally I want to say something like "all you liberals think alike" but thats just rude. What I can tell you is that if you haven't learned where I stand on Bush and US politics by now, you may never know. I am a true conservative. Bush, as I consistently describe him, is a liberal who is easy on taxes and claims to be religious. I like Ron Paul's stuff. He is the truest conservative that I have ever known much about, even more so than Ronald Reagan. Just because I don't spew hate to Bush and defend some of his policies has nothing to do with me being a lapdog for GWB. I think it just goes to show how much you have been listening to me once I stated I was a conservative. You would see alot of my points if only I crossed party lines. Which I could. I can easily identify myself as an Independent because I DON'T vote on party lines.

 

[threatlevelorange]

Even if he can't win (he can), voting for Ron Paul sends a message to the people who have been running the show without any respect for the wishes of those they were elected to represent.

What's the message voting for Paul sends? We're sick of the status quo.

They only way things are ever going to change is to let them know that we are watching, that we care about what's going on, and that we're willing to vote to change the situation.

Voting is the only thing that gets their attention. Vote because if you don't, they think you're happy with what's going on, and they'll keep lining their pockets with the profits they make for themselves, their friends and their true constituents, the corporate lobbyists.

Vote in the primaries. Vote for Ron Paul. Send a message they'll pay attention to.

It would appear that 11 out of 13 agree. I think at least one of those votes was just to spite me for being correst in another thread that there are moe RP supporters than HC.

 

[threatlevelorange]

Yeah, Ralph Nader got some peoples attention, enough to shove the vote to Bush, or make it at least feasable that he coluld have won. I hope if he doesn't win the primaries,(Not a chance), he splits the republican party into pieces.

In the dictionary:

Liberal pessimist.

One who insists that Ron Paul can't win Republican Nomination because conservatives don't care about the constitution....picture of Marx.

 

[medicineman]

Marx Marx Marx....

Where have I EVER stated that I fully support Bush? I don't even know how many times I've criticized him on this forum. Naturally I want to say something like "all you liberals think alike" but thats just rude. What I can tell you is that if you haven't learned where I stand on Bush and US politics by now, you may never know. I am a true conservative. Bush, as I consistently describe him, is a liberal who is easy on taxes and claims to be religious. I like Ron Paul's stuff. He is the truest conservative that I have ever known much about, even more so than Ronald Reagan. Just because I don't spew hate to Bush and defend some of his policies has nothing to do with me being a lapdog for GWB. I think it just goes to show how much you have been listening to me once I stated I was a conservative. You would see alot of my points if only I crossed party lines. Which I could. I can easily identify myself as an Independent because I DON'T vote on party lines.

I saw many posts by you earlier where you consumed the Bush rhetoric, at least you took offense to anyone that contested it. What about all your "we're doing the right thing in Iraq" posts, your "we were all fooled by the false intelligence" posts? Hey, I wasn't fooled a bit, I knew it was lies, and how did I know he asks. Because the same person that wanted to start the war (Cheney) was a major stockholder in Haliburton and the Carlisle group, both whom have made billions on this war. Yeah thats right, your people, the republicans, thieves all, started this war for profit. You may see it now, but I can tell by your earlier posts that you were all for it before. So, maybe my posts have done you some good. I hope so, it's the ignorant people that voted for the son-of-a-bitch the second time that need shock therapy.

 

[SoloGro57]

Comparing Ron Paul to Ralph Nader is laughable. Nader ran as a Left-Wing Independent. That's what gave Bush his chance to steal the Presidency.
Paul has stated that he will not run as an Independant if he does not win the Republican nomination.

 

[threatlevelorange]

I believe there is some confusion here if im not mistaken?

.....whaaat?

You see, Medicineman (who I refer to as Marx for his avatar of Karl Marx which he changed....yea its never gonna wear off, Marx) feels that if I don't join the popular opinion that GW lied about WMDs that I must be sucking his d*ck, and must support him over any RP, Reagan, Keyes or Huckabee. It's pretty silly. he doesn't understand the concept of telling this oppressive regime's infringing on civil rights to go take a hike. Appearently, the liberal status quo is to oppose the reduction of government no matter what after all...

The government has to treat everyone equally, don't ya know?

 

[threatlevelorange]

I saw many posts by you earlier where you consumed the Bush rhetoric, at least you took offense to anyone that contested it. What about all your "we're doing the right thing in Iraq" posts, your "we were all fooled by the false intelligence" posts? Hey, I wasn't fooled a bit, I knew it was lies, and how did I know he asks. Because the same person that wanted to start the war (Cheney) was a major stockholder in Haliburton and the Carlisle group, both whom have made billions on this war. Yeah thats right, your people, the republicans, thieves all, started this war for profit. You may see it now, but I can tell by your earlier posts that you were all for it before. So, maybe my posts have done you some good. I hope so, it's the ignorant people that voted for the son-of-a-bitch the second time that need shock therapy.

HAHAHA! oh man...Marx you never cease to impres me with your stubborn views.
Sure, maby it was corrupt. I never disputed that. So is Clinton selling intelligence to Chinese communists for campaign funds. But you don't see me whining about that, either.
I am telling you the surge is working. Its pretty sad that liberals hold their breath for the failure of our armed forces. Support the troops, not necessarily the war. Thats all I'm saying. Ther was a thread that said: support the troops, bring them home. That was just stupid and I had to point that out. Thats all. So I defend Bush...WHEN HE IS RIGHT. when he does the CONSERVATIVE thing. You forget also, that sometimes I play the devils advocate, which is probably why no ne pins me down when i talk politics.

 

[threatlevelorange]

Comparing Ron Paul to Ralph Nader is laughable. Nader ran as a Left-Wing Independent. That's what gave Bush his chance to steal the Presidency.
Paul has stated that he will not run as an Independant if he does not win the Republican nomination.

So many people hope he does. He won't though. He's just honest like that. I bet if he got another 10 million to do it and overwhelming support, he would change his mind. Otherwise its irresponsible and a waste of funding.

 

[medicineman]

HAHAHA! oh man...Marx you never cease to impres me with your stubborn views.
Sure, maby it was corrupt. I never disputed that. So is Clinton selling intelligence to Chinese communists for campaign funds. But you don't see me whining about that, either.
I am telling you the surge is working. Its pretty sad that liberals hold their breath for the failure of our armed forces. Support the troops, not necessarily the war. Thats all I'm saying. Ther was a thread that said: support the troops, bring them home. That was just stupid and I had to point that out. Thats all. So I defend Bush...WHEN HE IS RIGHT. when he does the CONSERVATIVE thing. You forget also, that sometimes I play the devils advocate, which is probably why no ne pins me down when i talk politics.

THe largest support, even endorsed by 90 percent of the troops, is to bring them home now. I realize there are crazies in the service that don't think for themselves, semper fi and all that horseshit, but the majority of those troops want to come home, How do I know he asks. Because 40 fucking years ago it was me in that situation and every swinging dick (Except a couple of crazies) wanted to go home.

 

[threatlevelorange]

THe largest support, even endorsed by 90 percent of the troops, is to bring them home now. I realize there are crazies in the service that don't think for themselves, semper fi and all that horseshit, but the majority of those troops want to come home, How do I know he asks. Because 40 fucking years ago it was me in that situation and every swinging dick (Except a couple of crazies) wanted to go home.

Yea. Although I am not sure about the 90% part.

 

[Wavels]

Med claims...
90% of the troops want to come home now??

Med that is a whopper even by your standards...you simply make things up!
Pathetic.
The truth must mean nothing to you.