Trichomes, THC and UVB light.....

sgtpeppr

sgtpeppr

Well-Known Member
Probably the beginning of Trichomes. Remember that before the addition of an observer(you) into the equation, nobody can tell what should be there. Everyone who looks at there plant in the same stage of growth could possibly all see something different. Sorry for the Quantum Physics. Why can't you get full magnification through the pc....is it a camera/microscope limitation, or a pc/usb limitation?
 
skunkushybrid

skunkushybrid

New Member
sgtpeppr said:
Probably the beginning of Trichomes. Why can't you get full magnification through the pc....is it a camera/microscope limitation, or a pc/usb limitation?
Click to expand...
It's the attachments, the camera end is not big enough to fit into the higher grade magnifier pieces. It's either the camera or the extra magnification bits, you can't have both.

I found this a little trying at first but the magnification is enough. The leaf pic's are off a plant that has been vegging for 16 days.
 
sgtpeppr

sgtpeppr

Well-Known Member
skunkushybrid said:
It's the attachments, the camera end is not big enough to fit into the higher grade magnifier pieces. It's either the camera or the extra magnification bits, you can't have both.

I found this a little trying at first but the magnification is enough. The leaf pic's are off a plant that has been vegging for 16 days.
Click to expand...
You can always have both....you just need to think creatively like MacGyver, or better than that once you get good at it.
 
Your Grandfather

Your Grandfather

Well-Known Member
Are the images pixilated? or just not sharp?

Pixilation can be fixed :) :hump:


skunkushybrid said:
It's the attachments, the camera end is not big enough to fit into the higher grade magnifier pieces. It's either the camera or the extra magnification bits, you can't have both.

I found this a little trying at first but the magnification is enough. The leaf pic's are off a plant that has been vegging for 16 days.
Click to expand...
 
skunkushybrid

skunkushybrid

New Member
No it's the actual camera attachment itself. The camera attachment fits in the scope, but not if I place a bigger magnification tube in first. The extra bits are too small to allow the camera to get in. I think the max i can get with the actual camera is 200x.
 
natmoon

natmoon

Well-Known Member
skunkushybrid said:
No it's the actual camera attachment itself. The camera attachment fits in the scope, but not if I place a bigger magnification tube in first. The extra bits are too small to allow the camera to get in. I think the max i can get with the actual camera is 200x.
Click to expand...
Yes mate which is why i told you about the lcd screened scopes,they see the image at the highest mag on the screen with any lens and you can then transfer the image from the lcd screen on the scope to your pc without the limitations.
Could you not find the scope i suggested,or was paying an extra 10 quid for the one that i suggested that was twice as good and properly digital just to much extra cash:confused:

Sorry to be like i told you so dude,that makes me a dick:mrgreen:

Any chance you can send that scope back and get the proper digital version from lidls?
You could say that you were unhappy with the results and demand your cash back.:blsmoke:

I know you don't trust me to much skunky but i promise that i wouldn't steer you wrong,this scope is the dogs bollox and will do exactly what you need it to do without all of the limitations of a normal scope with a usb enhancement.
 
skunkushybrid

skunkushybrid

New Member
Yes, I did remember about lidl, unfortunately the only store i know of didn't have any in... and in fact the girl I asked seemed to not know what i was talking about.

So I gave up... not wanting to settle for the same model for almost £150 I decided to go for the next one down which I thought would do exactly the same thing, only having to use the monitor instead, and it does... almost.

Trust? what are you talking about? You're the one with those issues, not me.
 
natmoon

natmoon

Well-Known Member
skunkushybrid said:
Yes, I did remember about lidl, unfortunately the only store i know of didn't have any in... and in fact the girl I asked seemed to not know what i was talking about.

So I gave up... not wanting to settle for the same model for almost £150 I decided to go for the next one down which I thought would do exactly the same thing, only having to use the monitor instead, and it does... almost.

Trust? what are you talking about? You're the one with those issues, not me.
Click to expand...
Ohh?
I thought you said i was a fucking lieing bullshitter,you even posted that in my gallery and in my threads.
But anyway moving on:mrgreen:
 
M

munch box

Well-Known Member
Thats messed up your shitting on natmoons threads like that. Even on his picture page? He must have done something really mean to upset you.
 
skunkushybrid

skunkushybrid

New Member
natmoon said:
Ohh?
I thought you said i was a fucking lieing bullshitter,you even posted that in my gallery and in my threads.
But anyway moving on:mrgreen:
Click to expand...
Yes, i remember calling you out on your bullshit... I can't help that. I'd do it again too.

This still doesn't have anything to do with trust... people lie to make themselves look good all the time, this doesn't make them untrustworthy, at least not completely so...
 
natmoon

natmoon

Well-Known Member
skunkushybrid said:
Yes, i remember calling you out on your bullshit... I can't help that. I'd do it again too.

This still doesn't have anything to do with trust... people lie to make themselves look good all the time, this doesn't make them untrustworthy, at least not completely so...
Click to expand...
If you had actually read what i had posted properly you would have seen that i had said that i hoped for an ounce per stem.

I had 8 stems on the indica which if they were not seeded and i had not taken one stem early would have probably been getting on for an ounce per stem because they were as fat as a can of deodorant and the biggest one was a 28" long bud the size of a can of deodorant.

I never actually said i had 8 ounces just that i hoped for an ounce per stem and that i had 8 stems.
In all reality you set onto me because i said your plants were fluffy and tied and weak and i made you angry so you set out to get me.
Anyway who cares huh and on a final note you slagged of my sativa with your "8oz what a bullshitter" jive comment in my gallery and we were talking about the indica shows how much attention to detail you pay really because i never said i could get anything like that weight from the sativa:mrgreen:
 
skunkushybrid

skunkushybrid

New Member
natmoon said:
If you had actually read what i had posted properly you would have seen that i had said that i hoped for an ounce per stem.

I had 8 stems on the indica which if they were not seeded and i had not taken one stem early would have probably been getting on for an ounce per stem because they were as fat as a can of deodorant and the biggest one was a 28" long bud the size of a can of deodorant.

I never actually said i had 8 ounces just that i hoped for an ounce per stem and that i had 8 stems.
In all reality you set onto me because i said your plants were fluffy and tied and weak and i made you angry so you set out to get me.
Anyway who cares huh:mrgreen:
Click to expand...
In all reality nat', you don't know what reality is...
 
natmoon

natmoon

Well-Known Member
skunkushybrid said:
In all reality nat', you don't know what reality is...
Click to expand...
And i was trying to walk away as well.:roll:

I think your talking about yourself again,you don't even seem to know the difference in what plant it is your attacking this time,or what you are reading,probably because you attack so many people and your to wasted all the time.:mrgreen:
 
tahoe58

tahoe58

Well-Known Member
holy sh*t you guys...give it a rest.....this thread is a debate about trichomes, uvb light, and THC.....lets ferget the pettiness and get on with the discussion of merit....PLEASE!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top