bottom line if that bitch was so worried about getting pregnant then she should have done something to prevent it in the first place, but instead of taking her birthcontrol like he wanted, she stopped to GET pregnant.
Men can also take responsibility, if he didn't want her to get pregnant, then why didn't he ensure it himself by using a condom? That would be the responsible thing to do.
THEN decided that she wasnt going to raise this baby because that would fuck her teenage partying up, and went and had an abortion without his prior knowing.
now granted he did NOT want a baby, But he didnt need that child he was supposed to be guiding in the world to be killed just because he isnt ready.
So he left the responsibility of contraceptives completely up to a partying teenager, then becomes upset when she realizes she'd made a mistake of trying to force fatherhood on someone who did not want a child, was not ready for one herself, and terminated the pregnancy. Brilliant, sounds like they're both irresponsible teenagers that would have made poor parents.
and if it wansnt killing then they wouldent give criminals additional charges for killing women carrying an unborn fetus.
I left room for argument that it could be considered killing. I personally don't feel that way. To me there isn't much difference to removing an embryo or pulling up weeds. Yes, it's alive. Yes, it will be dead now that you've uprooted it. But it felt no pain, cannot think, and is not able to want for it's life. And your garden is so much more pleasant for it.
Of course they will charge someone that killed a pregnant women with more than one death. The women that died, and most likely, her family, wanted to keep the fetus, and develop it into another person, but not only is the mother lost, but so is the new addition to the family. Her loved ones would want the murderer to suffer for both of those losses.
this thread is becoming an argument based on belief not on what IS. and the law states several places where killing an uborn fetus is ILLEGAL, in many states. But they ignore the fact that the mother is doing the same thing because of un-just reasons.
(See above.)
Whether or not it is un-just is debatable. I say the sheer discomfort and risks of pregnancy and child birth are reason enough to justify an abortion if one is wanted.
earthly-passions, im not saying that there arent some cases for it, it just shouldnt be because someone isnt willing to take care of it when there are so many people willing to take the child as their OWN children.
Actually, adoption rates have been in a steady decline for years. And many of the parents willing to adopt only want white babies. Even then, many will not except anything other than infants, healthy infants, which are they are assured has no mental defects.
In an age of sperm banks and ovum donations, fertility drugs and test tube babies; why pay money to adopt an infant that is twice as likely to commit suicide, no matter how well you raise it?
Picture attached is chart on current adoption rates in America.
Please take note: Exits are
not children that are adopted, they are children who grow up in the system, never adopted, and leave when they turn 18.
As you can see, that is the most common result of children put up for adoption, they go through life unwanted, grow up, and then leave.
