Here you go Veggie, proof WITH CITATIONS from the proposition. I don't know why you would need constitution citations, if there's something in specific that you want to know about in the constitution I'll be happy to help you out with that too!
7. Ensure that if a city decides not to tax and regulate the sale of cannabis, that buying and selling cannabis within that city’s limits remain illegal, but that the city’s citizens still have the right to possess and consume small amounts, except as permitted under Health and Safety Sections 11362.5 and 11362.7 through 11362.9.
8. Ensure that if a city decides it does want to tax and regulate the buying and selling of cannabis (to and from adults only), that a strictly controlled legal system is implemented to oversee and regulate cultivation, distribution, and sales, and that the city will have control over how and how much cannabis can be bought and sold, except as permitted under Health and Safety Sections 11362.5 and 11362.7 through 11362.9.
So what (7.) says is that you can't sell or buy in a city that does not tax
UNLESS Health and Safety Sections 11362.5 and 11362.7-11362.9 apply to you! Don't know what those are? Well, I'm going to pull them up for you, because they do indeed apply to you (you've said you had your 215 so I'm assuming they do)! Also, since 11362.5 and 11362.7-11362.9 are allowed then you can also grow in that city with a doctors recommendation, since it clearly states those rights will not be taken away.
What ( 8. )says is that the city will take over the buying, selling, and growing in large scale, unless 11362.5 and 11362.7-11362.9 apply to you!
§11362.5. Use of marijuana for medical purposes.
(a) This section shall be known and may be cited as the Compassionate Use Act of 1996.
(b)(l) The people of the State of California hereby find and declare that the purposes of the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 are as follows:
(A) To ensure that seriously ill Californians have the right to obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes where that medical use is deemed appropriate and has been recommended by a physician who has determined that the person's health would benefit from the use of marijuana in the treatment of cancer, anorexia, AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma, arthritis, migraine, or any other illness for which marijuana provides relief.
(B) To ensure that patients and their primary care-givers who obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes upon the recommendation of a physician are not subject to criminal prosecution or sanction.
(C), To encourage the federal and state governments to implement a plan to provide for the safe and affordable distribution of marijuana to all patients in medical need of marijuana.
(2) Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede legislation prohibiting persons from engaging in conduct that endangers others, nor to condone the diversion of marijuana for nonmedical purposes.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law: no physician in this state shall be punished, or denied any right or privilege, for having recommended marijuana to a patient for medical purposes.
(d) Section 11357, relating to the possession of marijuana, and Section 11358, relating to the cultivation of marijuana, shall not apply to a patient, or to a patient's primary caregiver, who possesses or cultivates marijuana for the personal medical purposes of the patient upon the written or oral recommendation or approval of a physician.
(e) For the purposes of this section, "primary care-giver" means the individual designated by the person exempted under this section who has consistently assumed responsibility for the housing, health, or safety of that person. (Added by 1996 initiative Measure Prop 215 §1, eff.: 11/6/96.)
I will give you the link for sections 11362.7 through 11362.9 because I don't want to take up a shit ton of room on this board.
For 11362.7 - 11362.83:
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/di...362.7-11362.83
11362.9 is for research purposes, feel free to look it up, but unless you work at a research lab in a UC, it does not apply to you.
It's made pretty clear that medical users will not have their rights stripped. Please read the prop in full, and read 215, you should know your own rights.