Shutn up about kush

puffntuff said:
It's gotten stronger and that's a fact. Like what dude said some of you oldies prolly smoked on some dank Thai stick etc. But it seems like the younger cats like indica and oldies like sativa. Nothing wrong with that. I prefer a 60/40 hybrid with sativa being the majority.
Click to expand...

I like hybrids too!!!! If I smoke weak cannabis, I just get pissy and feel like I need some real chronic after each hit. For me, couchlock is the only way!!!!!!!
 
Jefferstone said:
The only test results we've seen posted in this thread directly contradict what you just posted. Have you got any references? Pics or it didn't happen.

Hey, I've got a close relative who is a DEA agent too and she doesn't know shit about THC levels. Just cause you work for the DEA doesn't mean you're in the lab doing testing.

Have a read:

http://www.slate.com/id/2074151/

http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle-old/373/marijuanapotency.shtml
Click to expand...

lol you just cant teach an old dog new tricks
 
theexpress said:
lol you just cant teach an old dog new tricks
Click to expand...


and you can't teach an idiot who has no experience with something that they are just being ignorant.

You keep talking about "stringy schwag", yet you weren't around and never saw the stuff. you are just "assuming" because you want to believe that you are better than everybody else. The dealer I had for so long back in the late 70's never had stringy brickweed. All of his herb was buds, no leaves, no stringy shit. It was not compressed. I have honestly seen more stringy brickweed of low quality in the last 5-10 years than I ever experienced in the late 70s and early 80s.
 
DaLeftHandMan said:
ofcourse pot has gotten stronger and more potent over the years..lol..what would make someone think that it hadnt or couldnt? people plants animals and such, lifeforms, evolve! thats our nature!~ to grow change and becopme stronger! and thusly we carry that into other parts of life and other lifeforms! thats just simple theory and off the top of my head here folks..lol.but ya..if it hadnt gotten better what the HELL have we been doing for all these years?! lol
Click to expand...


I don't think that it hasn't or couldn't, I think besides people in this thread saying of course it has, no one has shown one study confirming that. No matter how many times you spout your opinion, it doesn't make it fact. I've posted a scientific study, and a couple of articles that say the incredible increase in THC is a myth. Somebody post something to back up your position.

One other point...I, and several of the other posters in this thread have smoked both. I've grown and smoked some serious shit recently that was probably some of the best weed ever. But I've smoked stuff in the seventies that was it's equal. See, since I've smoked both, I can compare. If you haven't, you have no basis for comparison and your opinion comparing the two just isn't worth shit.

What has happened though is that I now have a wider variety of excellent weed to choose from. There is no argument about that.
 
Jefferstone said:
I don't think that it hasn't or couldn't, I think besides people in this thread saying of course it has, no one has shown one study confirming that. No matter how many times you spout your opinion, it doesn't make it fact. I've posted a scientific study, and a couple of articles that say the incredible increase in THC is a myth. Somebody post something to back up your position.

One other point...I, and several of the other posters in this thread have smoked both. I've grown and smoked some serious shit recently that was probably some of the best weed ever. But I've smoked stuff in the seventies that was it's equal. See, since I've smoked both, I can compare. If you haven't, you have no basis for comparison and your opinion comparing the two just isn't worth shit.

What has happened though is that I now have a wider variety of excellent weed to choose from. There is no argument about that.
Click to expand...


and aside from you "fond memories" you dont have any proof of what your saying so STFU! least i have shown pix of dank ass new school shit
 
this that thai weed you old timers love soo much????
thai_stick7-500.jpg
 
Jefferstone said:
I don't think that it hasn't or couldn't, I think besides people in this thread saying of course it has, no one has shown one study confirming that. No matter how many times you spout your opinion, it doesn't make it fact. I've posted a scientific study, and a couple of articles that say the incredible increase in THC is a myth. Somebody post something to back up your position.

One other point...I, and several of the other posters in this thread have smoked both. I've grown and smoked some serious shit recently that was probably some of the best weed ever. But I've smoked stuff in the seventies that was it's equal. See, since I've smoked both, I can compare. If you haven't, you have no basis for comparison and your opinion comparing the two just isn't worth shit.

What has happened though is that I now have a wider variety of excellent weed to choose from. There is no argument about that.
Click to expand...

I am glad we can agree that their is now an excellent variety of killer cannabis. However, I thought you might find this source interesting:

Pot is 10 to 20 times stronger.
In 1974, the average THC content of marijuana was less than 1 percent. But by 1999, potency averaged 7 percent.
Today’s sinsemilla … averages 14 percent and ranges as high as 30 percent.
The point is that the potency of available marijuana has not merely ‘doubled,’ but increased as much as 30 times.
- John P. Walters, Former White House Drug Czar

Marijuana is more potent than at any time since scientific analysis of the drug began in the 1970s, according to a report from the University of Mississippi’s Potency Monitoring Project. The average amount of THC in marijuana, the primary psychoactive ingredient in the drug, was tested at 9.6% --more than double the potency of marijuana in 1983.

The highest concentration of THC found in a single sample was 37.2%.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/booster_shots/2008/06/marijuana-more.html
 
Stringy hippie buds ain't got shit on the amount of crystals we are producing these days.
How come subcool is growing these new strains instead of the old hippie dippy stringy nugs.
 
LouisXIII said:
I am glad we can agree that their is now an excellent variety of killer cannabis. However, I thought you might find this source interesting:

- John P. Walters, Former White House Drug Czar
Click to expand...


hmm, wonder why he said that? couldn't be part of the government propaganda machine...

That is total bs.
 
LouisXIII said:
I am glad we can agree that their is now an excellent variety of killer cannabis. However, I thought you might find this source interesting:

Pot is 10 to 20 times stronger.
In 1974, the average THC content of marijuana was less than 1 percent. But by 1999, potency averaged 7 percent.
Today’s sinsemilla … averages 14 percent and ranges as high as 30 percent.
The point is that the potency of available marijuana has not merely ‘doubled,’ but increased as much as 30 times.
- John P. Walters, Former White House Drug Czar

Marijuana is more potent than at any time since scientific analysis of the drug began in the 1970s, according to a report from the University of Mississippi’s Potency Monitoring Project. The average amount of THC in marijuana, the primary psychoactive ingredient in the drug, was tested at 9.6% --more than double the potency of marijuana in 1983.

The highest concentration of THC found in a single sample was 37.2%.
Click to expand...

If you had read any of the other links I put up, you would see that that statement has been widely discredited and even the DEA has backed away from it. Since 1% is the legal THC limit for hemp, can you tell me what all the hippies were going to jail for? The 1% statement from the Mississippi project has also been discredited.

Arthritis did you say? How's the diaper rash junior?
 
Dude, you have to learn to read. You can't base your opinion on what's been regurgitated by others with even less knowledge than you. Unless of course you belong to the Tea Party.

Did you ever smoke the old weed? I thought not. I stand by my earlier assessment of your opinions.

Later...
 
Jefferstone said:
If you had read any of the other links I put up, you would see that that statement has been widely discredited and even the DEA has backed away from it. Since 1% is the legal THC limit for hemp, can you tell me what all the hippies were going to jail for? The 1% statement from the Mississippi project has also been discredited.

Arthritis did you say? How's the diaper rash junior?
Click to expand...

you guys were getting locked up for smoking weed twice the potency of the top limit of hemp... wich isnt saying much...
 
Jefferstone said:
Dude, you have to learn to read. You can't base your opinion on what's been regurgitated by others with even less knowledge than you. Unless of course you belong to the Tea Party.

Did you ever smoke the old weed? I thought not. I stand by my earlier assessment of your opinions.

Later...
Click to expand...


ive smoked weed like this...... and i dont reccamend it for anyone under 50
PA180018.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top