Do We Dare Discuss 911 With Poll

[canuckgrow]

Who wants to discuss 911...Do you believe the official story? Part of it? all of it? none of it?

Well I messed up the Poll part so i am not going to start another thread.

I believe that 19 terrorists were trained and hired to fly those planes into the World trade Centre. By whom I have no idea but I suspect it was not Osama and Al Queda as suggested by the official story.

I believe that a missile struck the pentagon and not a plane at all as suggested by the Pentagons own security camera footage of the actual incident.

 

[canuckgrow]

I also believe that a shit tonne of money was made shorting United Airlines stock leading up to 911 coincidence????...Rarely when this much money is involved.

 

[El420]

inside job

 

[Fight411]

watch poltergiest on youtube about it blew my fucking mind.

 

[budsmoker87]

inside job.

 

[Padawanbater2]

I think it was "LIHOP" type situation. Something went down n they used it to their advantage.

Though with all the ties and connections, I really wouldn't be surprised...

 

[spliffbazz]

start a poll i reckon it was a inside job too....

 

[darkdestruction420]

Wow, just wow. lol. what exactly do you base these feelings on? independent sources have destroyed the conspiracy theories already, what new information do you have no one else knows about? none?

 

[spliffbazz]

Wow, just wow. lol. what exactly do you base these feelings on? independent sources have destroyed the conspiracy theories already, what new information do you have no one else knows about? none?

i suppose your part of the cover up too..lol

[video=youtube;w-0Ms7mId34]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-0Ms7mId34[/video]

 

[Padawanbater2]

I don't think it was a controlled demo...

 

[rosecitypapa]

Inside job

No plane ever hit WTC 7, why did it collapse on itself?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwSc7NPn8Ok

 

[canuckgrow]

Wow, just wow. lol. what exactly do you base these feelings on? independent sources have destroyed the conspiracy theories already, what new information do you have no one else knows about? none?

Care to post some links to the info destroying the conspiracy theories......I have yet to see them.

 

[ChubbySoap]

 

[canuckgrow]

HAHAHAH that is even funnier when you look at your avatar hahahahaha LOL'd

Come one dudes prove us all wrong.....Prove we should be wearing that tinfoil hat proudly...i'll be the first guy to put one on and post a fuckin pick of it right here on this thread.

 

[NoDrama]

Inside job. Steel buildings don't melt and fall down, if they did, this building would have fallen.

Mandarin Hotel in Beijing, burned for over 10 hours, nothing melted. It didn't have Asbestos covered steel beams either. (Asbestos is one of the best heat insulators known to man)

 

[UncleBuck]

i've bounced all over the spectrum of beliefs on this one and have now resigned myself to never knowing for sure.

 

[Balzac89]

Steel doesn't have to be melted to be weakened to the point where it cannot support the weight above. Such as how the twin towers fell.

 

[Balzac89]

[video=youtube;7rbfLLp7rBI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rbfLLp7rBI&feature=channel[/video]

Watch that and tell me that is an explosive device.

 

[NoDrama]

Steel doesn't have to be melted to be weakened to the point where it cannot support the weight above. Such as how the twin towers fell.

Even if that were true, all the floors below the impact site are quite capable of supporting all the weight and would never pancake, even with the force of impact. they make those buildings very very very strong. The impact of the plane would have done negligible damage to those huge steel girders. Kind of like a corvette running into a locomotive. Corvette is totally gone, but lucky if it knocked the dust off the locomotive.

Your video shows a complete building turning into dust before it even hits the ground. If it really did buckle, the remaining unharmed floors would not give out, and even if it were possible they would have altered the trajectory of impact into something a little more credible than near perfect self implosion.

 

[Balzac89]

What exactly is there to hold back the top 25 percent of the building from falling if a god damn plane hit it and damaged all of the reinforcement than what was left was heated by the fires inside. I just don't get why people act like it was something other than what it was.