Oh, sorry for the mixup man, I was just saying what I'd do if I were the OP. I've only run coco on its own. The thing about perlite is it actually doesn't support micro-life, because it's virtually inert. You'd be better off mixing coco croutons and just trying to have a good blend of different size material in your mix, that's what some of the high end mixes are doing nowadays. As far as leaching out of the pots, that's why I like smart pots, you can flood all you want, nothing makes it out other than water/nutrient solution.Yo wolverine, did you have problems running coco in with the hydroton? I'm in flood/drain buckets and wanted to add something for a little better mychrizal habitation so I threw about 20% perlite in there. I was worried that the flooding and draining would leach coco out of the mix and make a mess.
link in my sig
Namaste'
I say that AN is like Nike, they spend all their money on advertising. As you can see, it is quite effective. They are quality nutes for sure and people get great results. Are they the "best nutes"? Maybe. Are the ridiculously overpriced? Yes. Can you get the same results with other nute llines? There are many out there that do. I think if you look at many of the guys that have been growing for quite some time or those that obviously know what the hell they are doing and have journals to prove it, are not on the AN band wagon.
honestly, its more about grower skill and environmental control than it is about what brand your using (to a point). your time is probably better spent researching hoods, fans, and climate controls.
I don't think anyone would argue that Advanced aren't great nutes. But, so are Botanicare, GH, Cutting Edge...just to name a few. If you look at what AN spends on advertising it's easy to see that the premium they charge for their nutes is not for what's in the bottle. Nutrients aren't rocket science. Basically, any complete hydroponic solution can give you great results. Most of the respected companies have dialed in the formula pretty good. I've tried at least 6 different hydroponic solutions and guess what? With the exception of one that didn't do too well, all of them performed the same. This included AN. I chose Cutting Edge because they hardly advertise at all (more $$$ into the bottle), they are inexpensive, simple, and in all growth phases contain lots of K (I believe many nutes are a little low on K).i have been told by 2 friends who swear by advanced nutes..that they have had a million dollar challenge to any competitor for a couple years now...no one has won that challenge. what say u?
Excellent choice. Keep us posted.I'm going to go with dyna-gro:
foliage pro
mag pro
pro-tekt
bloom
+++some great white
How can a product be formulated for less frequent rez changes? You change your rez to ensure that the solution does not become imbalanced due to the differential plant uptake rates or certain nutrients. When the ratios of certain nutrients gets out of whack say lots of phos in relation to calcium, then one of the nutrients would get locked out. This process is called nutrient antagonism. While not such a big problem in veg (I do balanced top offs and let my rez go for a month), shit happens fast during high performance flowering.What's really appealing to me about AN is less res changes (2-3 weeks), and the PH buffering, if that stuff really works then I'm sold
How can a product be formulated for less frequent rez changes? You change your rez to ensure that the solution does not become imbalanced due to the differential plant uptake rates or certain nutrients. When the ratios of certain nutrients gets out of whack say lots of phos in relation to calcium, then one of the nutrients would get locked out. This process is called nutrient antagonism. While not such a big problem in veg (I do balanced top offs and let my rez go for a month), shit happens fast during high performance flowering.
You can only put X amount of nutrients in a formula with X ratios between the different nutrients. Uptake is uptake. I see this as a bullshit advertising. There are way too many variables involved. What if I have a 10 gallon rez for 20 plants? 100 gallon? The nutrient depletion rates and rez change requirements would be dramatically different.
Anyways, just trying to explain a hydro truth. It matters 0.0% to me what other growers are using.
I like Cutting Edge. $25.00/gallonhat is best bang for the buck for indoor/outdoor soil grow?
Actually I couldn't be more agree on the hype advertising, I really looked into the subject and noted some of the things you're saying. I've never done hydro thus it can be a little intimating and these are clearly newbie traps. I mentioned longer res changes because if you're using Voodoo Juice you have to leave it for 3 weeks in order for the bacteria and the other stuff to grow properly or that's what they say. If done starting flowering that'd be 3 less feedings for me. I haven't fact proved anything, and a side by side comparison is already in progress.How can a product be formulated for less frequent rez changes? You change your rez to ensure that the solution does not become imbalanced due to the differential plant uptake rates or certain nutrients. When the ratios of certain nutrients gets out of whack say lots of phos in relation to calcium, then one of the nutrients would get locked out. This process is called nutrient antagonism. While not such a big problem in veg (I do balanced top offs and let my rez go for a month), shit happens fast during high performance flowering.
You can only put X amount of nutrients in a formula with X ratios between the different nutrients. Uptake is uptake. I see this as a bullshit advertising. There are way too many variables involved. What if I have a 10 gallon rez for 20 plants? 100 gallon? The nutrient depletion rates and rez change requirements would be dramatically different.
Anyways, just trying to explain a hydro truth. It matters 0.0% to me what other growers are using.