Wolverine97
Well-Known Member
Lively, Don't get me wrong...I know EXACTLY what you were showing. I just didn't care for some people showing a fuller plant and others calling both plants shitty, not even knowing what plant it was. The case for Bushmaster your pics presented was very convincing. Personally, I doubt that anyone who has actually used the product even needs to see evidence that it works. I'm not sure what the big argument is about. It's just another tool in the garden.
As far as the gentleman with the LST plants "9 times bushier", it may be true. I use LST extensively on plants that yield 1/2 lb+. BUT, I still keep a bottle of Bush for when it may help with the grow. I, unlike some others, am not perfect, and make mistakes and misscalculations in the garden. I've found the Bush helpful in recovering from something like taking cuttings a little early and needing to reduce my vertical growth a bit for an even canopy. I'm not sure why this pisses people off. I've had a crop growing for the last 22 years, and I'm proud to say that I still learn new and helpful techniques all the time. Isn't that part of the fun of it all?
I don't know why people get pissed about it either, but it is one product I will not use in my garden. I don't like PGR's like that, and in the two grows (small sample size, take for what it's worth) that I've seen use it the buds were much leafier than without the Bushmaster, and trichome production was noticeably less. Maybe that was just luck of the draw, or poor use of the product, I don't know. That product just scares me.