Wow, I Can't Believe Its Not Marijuana

The Cryptkeeper

The Cryptkeeper

Well-Known Member
JWH chems can be insanely stronger than THC, the high is very intense. They are so powerful you can overdose and die on them unlike THC. If you have pure chemical powder be very careful, if your using "spice" type smoke blends then it is harder to overdose cus it is diluted but still very possible.
Click to expand...
Comparing it to THC when you've never smoked THC is incredibly unfair. You can overdose and die on anything. "Harder to overdose"? Clarify.
 
Kevdank

Kevdank

Well-Known Member
The Cryptkeeper said:
Comparing it to THC when you've never smoked THC is incredibly unfair. You can overdose and die on anything. "Harder to overdose"? Clarify.
Click to expand...
im pretty sure ive been high on THC thousands of times, if you mean pure thc then no i havent. You cant die on weed lol, phsyically impossible to smoke enough to die, your lungs would bleed before the actual drug killed you. 0 deaths from weed in thousands of years. BUT, if you do some research on how thc and JWH chemicals work, you will find that THC is only a partial agonist at receptor sites, while JWH can be FULL agonist, meaning it can have much more powerful effects. Harder to overdose as in pure JWH would take milligrams to overdose, while herbal blends containing JWH would take grams.
 
The Cryptkeeper

The Cryptkeeper

Well-Known Member
Kevdank said:
im pretty sure ive been high on THC thousands of times, if you mean pure thc then no i havent. You cant die on weed lol, phsyically impossible to smoke enough to die, your lungs would bleed before the actual drug killed you. 0 deaths from weed in thousands of years. BUT, if you do some research on how thc and JWH chemicals work, you will find that THC is only a partial agonist at receptor sites, while JWH can be FULL agonist, meaning it can have much more powerful effects. Harder to overdose as in pure JWH would take milligrams to overdose, while herbal blends containing JWH would take grams.
Click to expand...
I'm not going to go in to it, but you're out of your league, especially on the chemistry. You just admitted that you can both die on Marijuana and THC. THC being the complete subject of your past posts. :)
 
Kevdank

Kevdank

Well-Known Member
The Cryptkeeper said:
I'm not going to go in to it, but you're out of your league, especially on the chemistry. You just admitted that you can both die on Marijuana and THC. THC being the complete subject of your past posts. :)
Click to expand...
dude ur kinda dumb, its physically impossible to get enough THC into your system fast enough to die, the only way to get enough in your system fast enough to kill you is if you inject like 3 liters of pure THC into your veins, which is not gonna happen. Im pretty sure the subject of my last posts was that JWH is stronger than THC, the complete subject was not THC, did you even read them lol.

This is what research has found about one of the JWH chemicals

"Compared to THC, which is a partial agonist at CB1 receptors, JWH-018 (and many of its analogues) are full agonists. This means that users may experience far more intense effects compared to smoking cannabis. THC has been shown to inhibit GABA neurotransmission in the brain via several pathways. JWH-018 may cause intense anxiety, agitation, and even seizures or convulsions by inhibiting GABA neurotransmission more efficiently than THC. Cannabinoid receptor full agonists may present serious dangers to the user when used to excess."
 
The Cryptkeeper

The Cryptkeeper

Well-Known Member
Kevdank said:
dude ur kinda dumb, its physically impossible to get enough THC into your system fast enough to die, the only way to get enough in your system fast enough to kill you is if you inject like 3 liters of pure THC into your veins, which is not gonna happen. Im pretty sure the subject of my last posts was that JWH is stronger than THC, the complete subject was not THC, did you even read them lol.

This is what research has found about one of the JWH chemicals

"Compared to THC, which is a partial agonist at CB1 receptors, JWH-018 (and many of its analogues) are full agonists. This means that users may experience far more intense effects compared to smoking cannabis. THC has been shown to inhibit GABA neurotransmission in the brain via several pathways. JWH-018 may cause intense anxiety, agitation, and even seizures or convulsions by inhibiting GABA neurotransmission more efficiently than THC. Cannabinoid receptor full agonists may present serious dangers to the user when used to excess."
Click to expand...
I read Wikipedia as well, but it is NOT good when your trying to prove you're point to someone. :(
 
WvMade

WvMade

Well-Known Member
Its ok just don't smoke a big fat ass blunt of it. Its made for a few hits thats it. lol i like the "Get some...... SUPER KUSH" its damn good the taste is bearable and the high is good without the raceing heartbeat.
 
Kevdank

Kevdank

Well-Known Member
The Cryptkeeper said:
You made your point null and void by taking another persons work, which was taken from another persons work, that was taken from another persons work.
Click to expand...
so im guessing you conducted all your research first hand and didnt read anything that anybody else wrote?
Your statement is utterly retarded, how did you get through school without researching for essays or reading textbooks other people wrote.
just because someone else wrote it, doesnt mean it isnt true, how does quoting something automatically deem it false and untrue?
And if your talking about wikipedia being unreliable, well you can find the exact same information from hundreds of other studies and websites
 
The Cryptkeeper

The Cryptkeeper

Well-Known Member
Kevdank said:
so im guessing you conducted all your research first hand and didnt read anything that anybody else wrote?
Your statement is utterly retarded, how did you get through school without researching for essays or reading textbooks other people wrote.
just because someone else wrote it, doesnt mean it isnt true, how does quoting something automatically deem it false and untrue?
And if your talking about wikipedia being unreliable, well you can find the exact same information from hundreds of other studies and websites
Click to expand...
Now we're on to schools. More unreliable than Wikipedia. I'll carry on this conversation if you wish but it has become more 'utterly retarded' than your perception.
 
Kevdank

Kevdank

Well-Known Member
The Cryptkeeper said:
Now we're on to schools. More unreliable than Wikipedia. I'll carry on this conversation if you wish but it has become more 'utterly retarded' than your perception.
Click to expand...
wow, you sure have a way of twisting words in order to appear like your on top, lol grow some balls and argue like a man, dont just twist what I say to make it sound dumb. I know you know what I mean so stop acting retarded, and im pretty sure this conversation was over a while ago, but keep diggin yourself deeper if you so please
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top