See, that's odd because you claim people are against retail sales of cannabis, but where are they? I don't hear anyone objecting to what I proposed.Hopefully demand will support retail but it's the retail that the No voters are against here.
I really like the intent of what you're saying. But I think that opens a lot of door for the cops to fuck with people. The stricter the regulations, the easier it is for someone to fuck up. If cops know that, they'll definitely try and get people like like. All it would take is an accounting error and then the cops claim "it's illegal drug dealing posing as a legitimate business!". That's exactly what's happening now with the dispensaries in Santa Clara county. The cops are investigating their non-profit status.Anywho back on topic. I liked your ideas about legalization, I've been thinking about adding in coops somehow, here's my idea:
Cannabis Coops and Collectives: 1/5 the cost of a corporate start-up fee, and same space limitations. A coop or collective can occupy a plot or building in residential or commercial zoning. There is no limit to the number of plants or growers that can fit inside the regulated space. Weed can be sold at the coops/collectives at the digression of the members of the coop/collective. However, the coops or collectives must be run as a non profit organization.
Ideal wages (wages are to be determined by the coop, but no more %50 of the money may go the individual growers, and at least 10% of the money needs to be donated) will follow certain criteria such as, 5% of the weed money will go to maintenance, 25% electricity/water bills, 20% will go to grow mediums and nutrients, 35% will go to the members and growers in the collective as compensation for their work, and the remaining 15% will go to a local charity or funding for a local public school, chosen by vote of the members of the coop/collective.
If they choose to sell in bulk to stores there is opportunity for profit, a typical 5 lb pack of chronic (If you have about 19 other growers helping you out you better be able to grow chronic) in the future will have a drop in price, but not too dramatically. I'm assuming the price will linger somewhere around $10,000.
-$500 dollars to maintain their place.
-$2500 to pay for the water/electricity.
-$2000 to pay for the mediums and nutes.
-$3500 to be split amongst members.
-$1500 to be spent on a charity.
Note that this is for only one deal. Most clubs today buy 5lb packs of one strain once a month! Most clubs also offer around 25+ strains on average, with the more popular ones carrying around 40+ strains. With a perpetual grow and a high enough demand (legalization will probably raise demand, I don't see how it could lower demand), coops with this structure could have well payed employees and make enough money to support continual growing. As well as donate a considerable amount of money to a charity. The non profit and charity angles give the coop members a chance to say that they're giving more back to the community than anti mj right wing republicans. Win win imo.
Everyone can ignore my last post. You just said it way better.I don't think cannabis retail in a legal world should be classified as non profit only, for medical thats fine but people should be allowed to operate there business as they themselves see fit, sink or swim, not by the whims of some legislators far away with lobbyists to please....whats so bad about for profit business, it usually brings a higher quality product to the market because of competition and desire to make the most profit and maintain that profit through there brands reputation....Am I way off here? I want freedom from the prying hands of the gov., not regulations out the ass like in a Non-Profit business
Ahhh. I think I understand now. You mean have that as an option people have. In that case, I like it a lot.Well the coop idea would just be option for a smaller downpayment. It would be ideal if 20 growers in a neighborhood had their own grows and coop as well to try new things. They could also sell cannabis that they grew themselves out of the coop, but the money would be subject to the same regulations... less incentive imo.
i much like this sentiment, hoping for good things in 2012Well these are all great aspects of this delema we face, I am curious how to gain head ground for other states, since this issue of decriminalization effects the u.s. as a whole I and i'm certain others would be interested on how such a proposal would be spread to even the most close minded parts of this nation, basically I'd figure we need to get the doubt out of peoples minds that this is attainable and feasible with everyone's best interests kept in mind.
Then you will probably like this Tiki-jo Sweet too..Ernst, you crack me up man.. true word though sharing is caring. lest we forget we are but human.
I ask when I am unsure of the context.i would say i have a passion for cultivating and cannabis is a beautiful and wonder plant. so yes i do like cannabis (if that questions was directed toward me)