Dont listen to this bullshit.. because thats exactly what it is.

theexpress

Well-Known Member
You liked to be stoned BT likes to be high...that is the good thing about having both...from the pure of either to the innumerable hybrid crosses one should find what they like...I also prefer the high of sativas and it is a hard search for us sat lovers as almost everything is indica crossed these days
dude i promise you if buddy came here and took one bong hit of my sk he would die... he would have huge bags under his eyes, his body would feel heavy has hell, and he would have some issues doing simple shit like walking... and it would end with him curled up in the fetal possition sleeping like a 60 year old baby, next to a bunch of poptart wrappers.. while if i smoked his shit i wouldnt cough at all and hold it in untill when i exhale out almost no smoke then look at bricktop and say this all you got ?
 

Illumination

New Member
Well I also consider you to be my bud as well...learned from your posts as well...wasnt trying to cause more disturbance but actually trying to chill it out

And I wanna see the smoke that would do that to me as it has never occurred and I have been all over the world ....never found any that would make me fetal..I WANT SOME:fire:
 

theexpress

Well-Known Member
Well I also consider you to be my bud as well...learned from your posts as well...wasnt trying to cause more disturbance but actually trying to chill it out

And I wanna see the smoke that would do that to me as it has never occurred and I have been all over the world ....never found any that would make me fetal..I WANT SOME:fire:
i understand and agree with your last post.... i tried to leave it at different strokes for diffrent folks.. but he persisted in saying stupid shit like "the strains of the 60's were likely stronger then those of today" AND I HAVE A BIG PROBLEM WITH THAT.... cuzz while my shit will get him super fucked up to the point where he will be not wanting to move for hours but he may not prefer that high, his shit will BARELY MOVE ME IN TERMS OF GETTING HIGH and at that i wont prefer that weak cerbreal behind the eyes and temples buzz!!!
 

theexpress

Well-Known Member
well I wasn't taking sides or nothing but yes I agree that BT is accurate in his info...I basically feel it is a metter of preference which is the schism
you only feel bt is correct on his info cuzz he copy's and paste shit right from the source of information....... now think how hard that is to do...
 

theexpress

Well-Known Member
now because all that copying and pasteing and tales of glorious strains from yesteryear everybody thinks this man is always right???? lmao.... WOW... thats the magic of the internet huh
 

sniffer

Well-Known Member
there not tales ,, lol
how old are you guys , ever smoke any bud from the 90`s , 80`s or late 70`s
well im 45 and i have , and im telling you all this new weed is just not the same
 

Illumination

New Member
there not tales ,, lol
how old are you guys , ever smoke any bud from the 90`s , 80`s or late 70`s
well im 45 and i have , and im telling you all this new weed is just not the same
47 and I totally agree....Am on a mission to either find or create that high...I have travelled the world and was lucky enuff to get to many of the hotspots for weed
 

KlosetKing

Well-Known Member
Lol at you clowns arguing with BT over this crap. Alll you have is your caps lock and your 'my friend' stories and shit, and BT uses science, and frankly, years more experience than you. The whole thing is actually laughable.
 

KlosetKing

Well-Known Member
you only feel bt is correct on his info cuz he copy's and paste shit right from the source of information....... now think how hard that is to do...
OMG you mean BT is copying and pasting scientific data that supports his arguments straight from their scientific source? Wow, your right. I was a fool to think he might be credible......

*rolls away laughing hysterically*
 

theexpress

Well-Known Member
OMG you mean BT is copying and pasting scientific data that supports his arguments straight from their scientific source? Wow, your right. I was a fool to think he might be credible......

*rolls away laughing hysterically*
yeah just leaves you there to read it and then praise him while i have that same data stored in my head an explain it in my own words.... but yeah worship the man who copies and paste's lol... like i said before bricktop everyone who agrees with you is either similer in age to you or stupid... yall have fun now..

if you took offense to what i said then those people are who i am talking to....
 

KlosetKing

Well-Known Member
this is more for you old school sativa lovers... http://www.cannabis-seeds-bank.co.uk/ace-seeds/ace-seeds-feminized/ace-seeds-panama-feminized/prod_830.html

lol note the thc level at medium.... whos laffing now lol




lmao most autofloring strains are considerd medium too lol
You obviosuly still dont understand the change in the way they test potency anymore. Copy and pasted it may be, its scientifically sound, and all the 'data in your head' that you can 'explain in your own words' is no more meaningful to me than the ramblings of someone who cant get passed their own ego to look at collected data.
 

theexpress

Well-Known Member
You obviosuly still dont understand the change in the way they test potency anymore. Copy and pasted it may be, its scientifically sound, and all the 'data in your head' that you can 'explain in your own words' is no more meaningful to me than the ramblings of someone who cant get passed their own ego to look at collected data.
i dont understand..... you have 1974 old school sativa genetics listed there... and the thc level is medium... and that goes against everything you guys are saying.... so now i must be rambling because of that?

why dont you just give up like bricktop did
 

theexpress

Well-Known Member
says all this.......

Our ACE seeds Panama Feminized is another successful result of Ace Seeds breeders. This has been a project in the making of a new potential cannabis strain for several years now and is finally available for market! Using an IBL F4 Panama Green and infusing pollen from an early flowering IBL F4 Neville's Haze, Ace Seeds specialists have created a very potent, almost psychedelic sativa with no characteristics from the early indica influence added to the Haze.
Panama cannabis seeds produce marijuana plants with a typical sativa look, aromas and effects. They grow into tall well-proportioned plants of 6+" in height with an excellent leaf to bud ratio but pruning is required. It normally takes longer for this sativa cannabis variety to grow and mature; she also requires more light. After numerous attempts and numerous failures, the Panama strain, we offer, has the lowest flowering period yet to date, it lasts 12 weeks and ready for a harvest at the end of October. She is quite a good yielder and produces around 300 gr. of high quality marijuana.
Panama seeds were specially developed for indoor growing, it's not recommended to cultivate them in outdoor gardens. Pink and red flowers start to appear and spread fresh strawberry aroma.
Medicine produced from Panama sativa plants has lower CBD and higher THC counts which produce a more clear headed, energetic type of high which will take you back to the sixties. If compared with spirits, Panama is a fruit cocktail punch spiked with too much alcohol.
These cannabis seeds are NOT for impatient or amateur cannabis growers.




THEN IT SAYS THIS........ ACE Seeds Panama Feminized

Price: £39.99 Feminized Seeds Per Pack 05 Seeds Quantity:
Overall Rating:
Sex : Feminized
Type :
Sativa
Flowering :
Photoperiod
Genetics :
Panama ’74, Green Panama and Colombian “Punto Rojo”
Flowering Time :
Medium
Outdoor Harvest :
3rd week of October
Height :
Tall
THC Level : Medium
Characteristics :
Lemon aroma, vanilla and incense
 

KlosetKing

Well-Known Member
You are foolish to think that ONE strain you find that CLAIMS to be a legit old school genetics can represent an entire era of cannabis. The point in the end, that you don't seem to understand, that the best of the best then compared with the best of the best now, and same goes for the worst. If you truly think there weren't strains then that were just as good as strains now, you've got some serious denial going on. Ill attribute this to your age, or possibly the hype and media you've been spoonfed by the major lobbyists in the industry (cough high times since about 2k? cough).
 

theexpress

Well-Known Member
You are foolish to think that ONE strain you find that CLAIMS to be a legit old school genetics can represent an entire era of cannabis. The point in the end, that you don't seem to understand, that the best of the best then compared with the best of the best now, and same goes for the worst. If you truly think there weren't strains then that were just as good as strains now, you've got some serious denial going on. Ill attribute this to your age, or possibly the hype and media you've been spoonfed by the major lobbyists in the industry (cough high times since about 2k? cough).
and your just plain foolish......... cant teach an old dog new tricks.... and last time i checked no landraces were winning any cannabis cups... and before bt gets to copying and pasteing shit i ment no pure landraces, please dont be like blueberry won some awards and it has thai in it... thats not the same... since it been so refined and worked on...
 

sniffer

Well-Known Member
there are no more pure landraces all these seed companys crossed them with fast flowering indicas and ruined everything
along with the 3rd world miltary burning whole fields of it :(

all the good weed from days passed has almost been wiped off the earth
good luck with what we have left
 

Brick Top

New Member
i bow down to no SATIVA!!!!!! NO SATIVA I EVER TRIED I WOULD EVER CALL "OVERPOWERING" AND I DONT GIVE A FUCK WHAT YOU SAY IVE HAD THE BEST, IVE SMOKED ARJANS HAZE'S, IVE SMOKED THE ORIGENAL HAZE, IVE SMOKED BOTH SILVER HAZE, AND SUPER SILVER HAZE {SILVER HAZE X N.L.}, IVE SMOKED NEVILLES HAZE, IVE EVEN SMOKED ALOT OF THOSE SHITTY LANDRACES WE HAVE BEEN ARGUEING ABOUT...... IVE NEVER MET A SATIVA THAT PUT ME WHERE I WANTED TO BE....
You know darn well that you were not alive, or least not of an age to toke, in the 60's and the 70's so that means you know there is no way in the world that you can say that you smoked the exact same strains. Over the years I have seen MANY strains, and tried most of them, that carried the same name as the strain from the past that I talk about but never once were any of them the real deal, the Real McCoy, the same strain. They were remakes that did not hold a candle to the true genetics that some breeders was trying to make an easy buck off of because they figured someone out there would love to try the famous strains from the past.

Like the Acapulco Gold that Dr. Greenthumb tried to pawn off as being the real deal. It wasn't anywhere near the real stuff. It was closer to being Ghetto Gold than Acapulco Gold, and the same goes for all the others I have tried that claimed to be the same as famous past strains.

You said you never met a sativa that put you where you wanted to be. Well if that was almost comatose and drooling on yourself staring blankly at the weather channel for hours with your tail end locked to your couch, then I would agree that none would ever do that. But that is not the definition of potency, that is a matter of preference and preference alone.

But I cut my teeth on and survived off of sativa strains, pure sativa strains and not the hybrids you listed in your message as if they actually fit into the comparison I have been making, and they would all take you somewhere that you would not want to be, somewhere you were not prepared to go, somewhere you could not handle being taken and they would get you there in the blink of an eye. They would get you higher than you ever imagined possible and a couchlock loving puppy lie you would piss yourself on blastoff and shit yourself long before reentry.

I am still waiting for your expert explanation about the changes made in how THC levels were tested. You want to make yourself sound like you are an expert because you claim to have chucked some pollen and created a mutt of your own so go ahead and prove your expertise. Tell us all about it. Or is it that you cannot tell anyone about it because like all the rest that you do not know nothing about, you know nothing about it either?

Which of the two is it? If you know, and if you keep ducking the question, it will be taken by everyone that you do not have the slightest clue, so if you know you might as well explain it. If you do not have even the slightest clue, which I am positive is the case, why not just put out all the effort you can muster and make the very best attempt that you possibly can to try to be a real man for the very first time in your entire life and just admit that you do not have the slightest clue?

Then you can plunk yourself down on your couch and smoke an ounce of that Roadside Red you claim you created and try to catch a buzz and put all this behind you.
 
Top