Serapis
Well-Known Member
Funny, then I guess anyone running similar news stories, such as Al Jazera, BBC and CNN are also clearinghouses of misinformation? puhlease.... maybe we should all rely on USENET for our 'news'? 
Fox News DEBUNKS "Al Gores hyterical global warming theory" lol
- Thread starter deprave
- Start date
newatit2010
Well-Known Member
So it's the host now, not the idea that they have the left side and the right side opinions. They give people both sides so they can make up their own minds. The problem is the left have nobody to tell them what to think.
As far as global warming the earth has destroyed it self more than once and came back. Stupid people want change her mind.
Serapis
Well-Known Member
Not sure what your implication is regarding stupid people, but a lot of scientists believe that the current warming is because of the pollutants that we are putting into the atmosphere, not a natural occurrence such as you are referring to.
mame
Well-Known Member
No one on the left even has a chance on fox News even if there are some working there. It's always 2 or 3 conservatives yelling at 1 liberal. Using Anthony Weiner's appearances on Fox as an example, they pretty much just yell over him in an obvious attempt to drown out what he is saying... that's hardly debating the man.
edit: another example(not on fox but it is Bill O'reilly yelling at a liberal... Krugman): [video=youtube;MUOFTPbxuWA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUOFTPbxuWA[/video]
edit: another example(not on fox but it is Bill O'reilly yelling at a liberal... Krugman): [video=youtube;MUOFTPbxuWA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUOFTPbxuWA[/video]
Serapis
Well-Known Member
I use to LOVE watching Bill O'reilly, he is intelligent and witty. He always made me laugh. I no longer watch him, because he talks over his guests if he disagrees... he is THE SPIN ZONE and he knows it. I miss his old style, fair reporting....
newatit2010
Well-Known Member
Stupid people who think that man kind will destroy the world by driving cars and make our eletricty. When mother nature gets ready she will claim her world and man kind will be gone, just ask the dinasours. they had no cars or electricty.
And look what mother nature has giving us.
Serapis
Well-Known Member
So even though we know fluorocarbons eat away at the upper atmosphere, we should keep using them without regard for the effects? Interesting....
newatit2010
Well-Known Member
Sir I am more afraid of a dirty bomb going off in NYC from a muslim than the atmosphere being destroyed by fluorocarbons.
The earth was iced over at one time and the earth was on fire at one time, so fluorocarbons can hurt the earth that much.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
I'm more afraid of people who only think Muslims would set off a bomb...Timothy McVeigh ring a bell ...hmmmm I wonder would he have been a member of the tea party..????he hated government as well
Serapis
Well-Known Member
Is that the conservative take on it? Ignore pollution? What if we drop the whole global warming debate and just focused on cleaner air and water... would you still not care? Why not reduce emissions and our reliance on fossil fuels if it means clean air and water and better health?
deprave
New Member
he does have a point aside the unnecessary vulgar racist stereotype - there is more immediate threats to humanity then global warming and it is more likely something would happen long before we destroyed the earth from global warming due to these threats. Terrorism however is not one of those threats in my view. For example, Isn't it more likely for us to reach peak oil and are forced to stop using fossil fuels before we totally destroy the atmosphere? Isn't it more likely that we have more natural disasters and nuclear power plant leaks and other pollution that destroys humanity before we destroy the atmosphere? Isn't it more likely we will be wiped out by a virus or some form of biological warfare or attack before we destroy the atmosphere?
I am not trying to discredit global warming as I think its INCREDIBLY important. I am just saying its not so important that it should be at the forefront of so many discussions. The energy crisis is more grave but it is related so I guees thats why it gets talked about so much because of the level of controversy.
I am not trying to discredit global warming as I think its INCREDIBLY important. I am just saying its not so important that it should be at the forefront of so many discussions. The energy crisis is more grave but it is related so I guees thats why it gets talked about so much because of the level of controversy.
Serapis
Well-Known Member
I agree one hundred percent that we have more pressing issues, like the economy and jobs..... however, you started this thread and meant to poke fun at a topic that is hotly debated..... are you not then surprised to get responses that are on topic? The discussion of other more pressing issues is valid, but it is off the topic that you set.....
nope, no, no way. LOL top 4 skeptics believe it was caused by man eh? Skeptics don't believe in any of that shit, thats why they are skeptics.
Care to prove who those top skeptics are and then provide a statement from each one stating they believe it is caused by man? Cuz i don't believe it for one second.
You are right, Tim did set off one of the bombs, the other 2 were inside the building and were defused by the bomb squad.I'm more afraid of people who only think Muslims would set off a bomb...Timothy McVeigh ring a bell ...hmmmm I wonder would he have been a member of the tea party..????he hated government as well
Serapis
Well-Known Member
Fluorocarbons have been banned for over 30 years now, time to catch up. http://www.epa.gov/history/topics/ozone/01.htm
Charlie Ventura
Active Member
Al Gore is a con man. He deserves to be Bernie Madoff's cell mate.
You know, the other bombs inside the Murrah building, the big ones.
[video=youtube;NWwrEEP8EBk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWwrEEP8EBk[/video]