LordWinter
New Member
Yes, we do agree that weed is not a harm. What you don't realize, however, is that I'm not dismissing your point, I'm approaching it from a different angle. Just because I'm learning to grow doesn't mean I don't know the history. I just believe that, at this stage, it's time for us as a community to stop pushing in the states that have MMJ laws and work within them. Why do I think it is time for this? I believe it is time for this because we have more than 1/4 of the union with MMJ laws yet we still suffer under the Feds because they won't recognize our rights, as given to us by our respective states. It's time to step up the fight, not make ourselves look like petulant children. THAT is how we pay our respects to the people who sacrificed so much to get us where we are now. You believe in Civil Disobedience, so do I. I also believe in picking my fights. You see, I understand the slimy little bastards that write our laws. I understand how they think. I understand how they work. I understand what makes them tick. I hate them for it. I grew up around the gutless weasels and their ass-kissing little patsies. Yeah, patsies. That's exactly what they are... some stupid little whipping-boy intern that takes the blame when shit goes south. They are leeches who want nothing more than to fatten their pockets and those of the lobbyists who contribute so much to the campaigns. The voters are barely a consideration until we get pissed off and people start losing elections. That's the only time we're acknowledged. You and I aren't that different in how we view the government and laws, MI. I just believe in going about things a different way.^^^ Perfect... I'l take the bait & have this conversation... seeing that you took the time to give better representation of your position.
For starters... we both agree that weed/medical marijuana is not a harm... never has & won't ever be. My point of contention, that you are dismissing, is that the freedoms you enjoy now, under the umbrage of medical marijuana laws, is at the cost of freedom to others... quite literally, jailed. We aren't discussing crack in the elementary schools... we as educated adults, recognize the 'War on Drugs' for the irrationality that it really is. We all seemingly agree here... just w/o recognition of the history that got us the to present day.
The laws, as discussed in theory, is something that is mutable & dynamic... changing & altering as the demands & needs of a society change. This is how it is with marijuana... recognizing the irrational fears that instigated it, the prejudice under which it was executed & the inevitable recognition (by otherwise rational adults) that the whole endeavor was misguided & wrong.
What you have now is the culmination of a number of factors... but the primary impetus of MMj is to in fact decriminalize & ultimately to legalize. With the underlying agreement that the War on Drugs, in particular, the demonizing of marijuana, was/is wrong.
I make the moral distinction when it comes to ruining a person's life... and those of their family members... and the community & country by extension... a wrong... an evil... that is perpetuated under the existing laws. I do believe in Civil Disobedience.
It is disrespectful & ungrateful & presumptuous & short sighted of you to make moralistic judgments upon people... without any real regard to the consequence of such irresponsible dribble... attitudes like yours allow for the continuation of these laws... that ruin the lives of our peoples, family & society.
The evil isn't weed... the evil is deep within ourselves. And you are putting it on display.
Theoretical law... now I understand how we came to this point. I'm not talking about theoretical law here. If you look back at my posts in this thread, you'll see that I've been talking about this from the viewpoint of a prosecutor. I know the mindset, I helped my best friend study a lot while he got his law degree. We have an adversarial justice system. It is the job of the prosecuting attorney to interpret the law as narrowly as possible. It's all about the convictions for them. Our rights are only a consideration when it comes into conflict with the constitution, and even then only barely so these days. So, no matter what moralistic standpoint you or I take, THEY are gonna go straight for the throat.
Morals? How much moral high ground can someone claim when they tell someone that it is okay to sell to dispensaries when they fall under grey areas at best, areas that only a State Supreme Court Justice can give final say on? Are you going to support a man's kids if you give him advice that gets him sent to prison? You're worried about someone's life being ruined, yet you advocate methods that could lead someone into a test case for dispensaries that could bankrupt them. What are you going to do when that stain is on your hands? Blame the law? They may not have ever gone to the dispensary had it not been for your advice, in fact, let's say they didn't even know a dispensary was close by or would even buy from them. What I don't get most of all, and would love to have answered is: How do you justify criticizing caregivers who want to sell or do sell to their patients when you supply dispensaries with their weed? Who do you honestly think the dispensary is selling their pot to? Dispensaries are charging up to $400/oz, yet caregivers get crucified here for mentioning a sale for even half that. Why? What justification could you possibly have for such a double standard?
No, you can criticize my words of caution all you want, but it's not going to take the truth out of them. I can agree to disagree with YOU, though, because you chose to take this back to a civil and intellectual level. Thank you for that.