morgentaler
Well-Known Member
The basis of science is the Scientific Method.
http://www.sciencebuddies.org/mentoring/project_scientific_method.shtml
Once it was developed, science was no longer a blend of observation, alchemy, and religion.
Structure not only increased the effectiveness of research, by stripping away any which lacked evidence it separated the philosophical and religious pursuits which claimed to be scientific.
If there is no evidence for creation it will not be included in a science paper. And in a reputable journal peer-review will not let research with no verifiable data last for long.
"God created the universe" is a statement completely devoid of evidence. It can not change with no evidence to build upon. To even make the claim one must first define the god in question. How can you do that if you have no data to work with? The bible lacks anything that could be even considered viable scientific evidence.
http://www.sciencebuddies.org/mentoring/project_scientific_method.shtml
Once it was developed, science was no longer a blend of observation, alchemy, and religion.
Structure not only increased the effectiveness of research, by stripping away any which lacked evidence it separated the philosophical and religious pursuits which claimed to be scientific.
If there is no evidence for creation it will not be included in a science paper. And in a reputable journal peer-review will not let research with no verifiable data last for long.
It's odd you would use Big Bang vs. Steady State. 50 years ago they had already gathered enough new data about the size, shape, age, and movement of objects in the universe to find that the evidence pointed toward the Big Bang. Indeed, the theory may change as new evidence is found still. But it will be built upon the knowledge that came before it.I'm sure there are plenty of examples of scientists who don't accept the melding of science and creation. It's like the big bang vs. steady state debate. How do we know we aren't in a steadily expanding and contracting universe, an existence which pulsates endlessly, has no beginning and no end?
"God created the universe" is a statement completely devoid of evidence. It can not change with no evidence to build upon. To even make the claim one must first define the god in question. How can you do that if you have no data to work with? The bible lacks anything that could be even considered viable scientific evidence.