Where the Hell did that come from? Affirmative Action allows your "black" to attain his goals and dreams just like anyone else. Unlike that last 400+ years living in America. This isn't just about African Americans it also helps Latinos, Asians, Arabs, Indians, Native Americans and any other ethnic minority that's struggling to make it here.
Some of these laws force them to hire less qualified individuals, if the law says they have to hire a man and a woman and 100 men apply and only one woman who is not well qualified she will be hired because she has a vagina, the requirements for lap times push ups and carrying or lifting weight are lower for women, I want the best fire man not the most politacly correct fireman
No it does not, affermitive action presumes that a black can't get a job without government help
While it's not this exact situation, don't forget Terri Shaivo from a few years back... That happened to be the final straw when came to me and supporting any Republicans by default. They abandoned rule of law and attempted to subvert the final wishes of Terri (it had already been established that absent a written will, the spouse's claims of the incapacitated person's intent are sufficient).
I like that idea... should come up with some lyrics to fill in demonstrating the rights we've given up in the past two centuries.
Like my right to travel in an automobile without a licence
in order to maintain a free society, the rights of all individuals within the private sector must remain sacrosanct. the right to the unencumbered use of their own property might be seen as secondary only to self-ownership when considering these individual rights. this means that no one is entitled to any particular employment nor access to any goods or services, as all those are the property of the employer or the merchant. they must remain free to choose how they will go about disposing of their property. you may not like their choices, i may not like their choices and the rest of society may not like their choices, but depriving them of that choice is an unconstitutional abuse of the violent powers of the state.
i realize that this is a fruitless conversation to have with a statist dupe. you live and die by the ideology that gave rise to the welfare state and are incapable of finding fault with even its most corrupt aspects. that the productive are forced to support the unproductive at the point of government's gun barrel must seem as natural to you as drawing breath.
"Under the law as written in Executive Orders and interpreted by the courts, anyone benefiting from affirmative action must have relevant and valid job or educational qualifications."
"Under the law as written in Executive Orders and interpreted by the courts, anyone benefiting from affirmative action must have relevant and valid job or educational qualifications. "
Licensing I have no problem with - while our governments own the roads; however I do think roads and highways should be privately owned and regulated, by their respective owners.
Really? Know me that well do you?
Even if you post it twice, I would still prefer they be free to hire the most qualified applicant- not just someone with relevant and valid job skills
If the individual isn't qualified then they don't get hired. How could you possibly know if someone is more qualified than another? That's like saying one individual is more equal than another. I'm still waiting for examples.
A toga frat party?
By checking their qualifications....?
well, i've explained it to you twice and i don't think you are quite so dense as to have missed it both times. it has become quite obvious that you are simply incapable of grasping the concept that, no matter how compassionate the intent may appear to be, the welfare state is based on government sanctioned theft.
