Timmahh
Well-Known Member
i tend to think way outside the box, and usually even beyond what those that think outside the box do. they tend to think i can be a bit wiggy. lol
but every point intime has millions of different angles viewing it. I try to fathom the majority of those potential views, and then summize a probable outcome.
my summation of the pic not being released. irrelavent, as the act of how he was killed fully pales the pic of the end result in comparrison.
Since when did it become ok to kill anyone unarmed? regardless of crime or due process. while i am fully behind the fact he was not an american, thus not beholden to american judicial system, as a world criminal, he was, and should of been held to the world court, tried, convicted of war crimes against humanity, and then dealt with accordingly. For killing Muslims, his own religeon deems he must be put to death. but even then, he should of been atleast tried publicly, maybe even stoned to death as that would be an appropriate punishment for his crimes in his religeon and regeon of nationality if im not mistaken.
but every point intime has millions of different angles viewing it. I try to fathom the majority of those potential views, and then summize a probable outcome.
my summation of the pic not being released. irrelavent, as the act of how he was killed fully pales the pic of the end result in comparrison.
Since when did it become ok to kill anyone unarmed? regardless of crime or due process. while i am fully behind the fact he was not an american, thus not beholden to american judicial system, as a world criminal, he was, and should of been held to the world court, tried, convicted of war crimes against humanity, and then dealt with accordingly. For killing Muslims, his own religeon deems he must be put to death. but even then, he should of been atleast tried publicly, maybe even stoned to death as that would be an appropriate punishment for his crimes in his religeon and regeon of nationality if im not mistaken.
