Vote ron paul!!!!

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
PushForKush said:
pfft. you make things too complicated.... its fucking simple. of course no one would want murder to be legal, but that's such a big extent.

what if something happend and there was no government to protect us? would you start murdering people? would you suddenly turn racist and put signs on your house? sure, we need the government for protection and for many different things, but there are so many things that are unnecessary. sometimes to have something RIGHT, you have to bring along something WRONG with it.

i would much rather have no gov. at all than one that puts so many restrictions that i cant express the way i feel.
Click to expand...
someone is stopping you from expressing the way you feel?

you must not live in the same country i do. we have a first amendment here that protects that right. :lol:

exaggerate much?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Straight Sativa said:
I understand why you are voting for Obama becuase of your wife and her insurence situation, and I respect that. So being as we are two differnet people in two different situations with different circumstances, maybe we can agree to disagree. Ron Paul's policies would work for me, maybe not so much for you, idk. But I don't and believe me I won't go around sabotaging Obama threads...

BTW I voted for obama in 08', and consider myself a moderate liberal. Not that it's of concern just lettin ya know where I'm coming from. ;-)... :neutral:
Click to expand...
ron paul's policies would not effect me in the least.

they would effect those i know in a very negative way.

he is one of those religious nutjobs you condemn.
 
hazyintentions

hazyintentions

Well-Known Member
Almost 20 pages in a day, impressive, to the OP, these guys parade around condemning Ron Paul with the same talking points day in and day out, there is no point in trying to level, reason, or argue with them, the best policy is simply to ignore them.

With that said I would suggest us "Paulbots" invest in some of this :
 
Slojo69

Slojo69

Well-Known Member
I thought Donald Trump was going for president? Why hasn't this conversation went towards that yet?! If I ever vote once in life, it would be for that! lol
 
Carne Seca

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
beardo said:
He's not anti gay- marrige is between a man and a woman, and because of people who don't realize that we need to define it as such to put an end to costly legal battles
Click to expand...
According to whom? It is scientifically based? Is it based on psychological studies? Is there any empirical evidence supporting this view? No. It is strictly a cultural/religious bias. Your so-called "definition of marriage" is a modern construct. Marriage throughout history included multiple spouses, concubines, harems, incestual combinations that boggle the mind, and child marriage (still happening in some parts of the world) Your definition is bullshit based on a recent religious taboo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top