The great thermite debate.

Mr Neutron

Mr Neutron

Well-Known Member
ginjawarrior said:
not even a whimper of debate?

i have looked at facts about 911 and owned up to my previous idiocy

what your lack of argument adds up to
= you are not brave enough to own your own mistakes
Click to expand...
What mistakes? The only mistake I made was assuming you had some evidence to the contrary but the best you could come up with was "irrelevant, poor journalism, irrelevant, WTC 7 got hit by falling debris and that caused it to "implode" 7 hours later and that Silverstein refers to multiple firemen as "it".
There is no relevance to any of your so-called answers.
Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time!
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
Mr Neutron said:
What mistakes? The only mistake I made was assuming you had some evidence to the contrary but the best you could come up with was "irrelevant, poor journalism, irrelevant, WTC 7 got hit by falling debris and that caused it to "implode" 7 hours later and that Silverstein refers to multiple firemen as "it".
There is no relevance to any of your so-called answers.
Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time!
Click to expand...
oh go on i was so disappointed by first....

show your working....?
 
hazyintentions

hazyintentions

Well-Known Member
mexiblunt said:
I think a new independant investigation would be great for all sides of this matter.
Click to expand...
That would satisfy me, as long as it was thorough, attacked the events from all sides, and undoubtedly discredited any false evidence theories.

Will that happen? Not anytime soon, maybe in 10 more years, and when I'm 30 I'll look back and think, "oh boy."
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
hazyintentions said:
That would satisfy me, as long as it was thorough, attacked the events from all sides, and undoubtedly discredited any false evidence theories.

Will that happen? Not anytime soon, maybe in 10 more years, and when I'm 30 I'll look back and think, "oh boy."
Click to expand...
why? what are your doubts ?
 
Mr Neutron

Mr Neutron

Well-Known Member
"I apprehend no danger to our country from a foreign foe ... Our destruction, should it come at all, will be from another quarter. -- From the inattention of the people to the concerns of their government, from their carelessness and negligence, I must confess that I do apprehend some danger. I fear that they may place too implicit a confidence in their public servants, and fail properly to scrutinize their conduct; that in this way they may be made the dupes of designing men, and become the instruments of their own undoing. Make them intelligent, and they will be vigilant; give them the means of detecting the wrong, and they will apply the remedy." Daniel Webster
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
Mr Neutron said:
"I apprehend no danger to our country from a foreign foe ... Our destruction, should it come at all, will be from another quarter. -- From the inattention of the people to the concerns of their government, from their carelessness and negligence, I must confess that I do apprehend some danger. I fear that they may place too implicit a confidence in their public servants, and fail properly to scrutinize their conduct; that in this way they may be made the dupes of designing men, and become the instruments of their own undoing. Make them intelligent, and they will be vigilant; give them the means of detecting the wrong, and they will apply the remedy." Daniel Webster
Click to expand...
lol you really have not a voice of your own?

i dub you thee sir "chicken shit"
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
If WTC7 was indeed injured beyond repair by having its ground level damaged by falling debris then that is where the collapse should have started, but it started at the penthouse.


[video=youtube;hZEvA8BCoBw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw&feature=player_embedded[/video]
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
If WTC7 was indeed injured beyond repair by having its ground level damaged by falling debris then that is where the collapse should have started, but it started at the penthouse.


[video=youtube;hZEvA8BCoBw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw&feature=player_embedded[/video]
Click to expand...
who has said it was damaged to ground level?

and who said thats how it collapsed?

links would be great you know
 
F

feff f

Active Member
nd, there was shit flying everywhere that day. not only from the towers but from plane parts, bodies, concrete....who knows where shit would have, could have flown. it flew. thats all you need to know.

okay, lemme take you back to our youth. you had gi joe, you had lincoln logs, you had army guys (3 inch tall plastic guys with bases between their feet) you had card houses, cardboard houses

no matter how much time you spent with the little guys, and setting them up, once gi joe jumped in the pile, anything could happens

but once you threw the 20 inch gi joe into the mix, shit flew where you couldnt predict. kinda like what happened on the ground, at ground zero.

there is simply no way to predict what will happen when a 600 mph jet flies into a bulding at a certain angle blah blah blah

one thing i can absolutely say with certainty that the towers were knocke down by planes smashing into the side of them and the resulting effects.

those towers didnt need thermite to knock them down. after those catastrophic hits, they were more than capable of coming down on their own.

it takes more of a stretch to prove that thermite knocked them down than it does to prove a couple hundred ton aircraft hitting it at 600 mph did the deed. the answer is obvious.
 
F

feff f

Active Member
judging by what i see so far, the nominee isnt on the stage yet.

i have some ideas but there will be more people getting in this.

but newt looks good and ro paul makes the most sense but is unelectable,,,,


we need more candidates.
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
Mr Neutron said:
Irrelevant...
Click to expand...
by jove is this old coot finally getting it?

how abouts you spend some time looking through your list of "theories"

look for things that would be actually valid as "evidence" to do with 911

bring this "evidence" here

for example lets see your evidence of "molten steel" that is undeniably connected to 911

your granny taking a shit in Silversteins image on 9/10 however dosen't prove a false flag
 
dukeanthony

dukeanthony

New Member
feff f said:
nd, there was shit flying everywhere that day. not only from the towers but from plane parts, bodies, concrete....who knows where shit would have, could have flown. it flew. thats all you need to know.

okay, lemme take you back to our youth. you had gi joe, you had lincoln logs, you had army guys (3 inch tall plastic guys with bases between their feet) you had card houses, cardboard houses

no matter how much time you spent with the little guys, and setting them up, once gi joe jumped in the pile, anything could happens

but once you threw the 20 inch gi joe into the mix, shit flew where you couldnt predict. kinda like what happened on the ground, at ground zero.

there is simply no way to predict what will happen when a 600 mph jet flies into a bulding at a certain angle blah blah blah

one thing i can absolutely say with certainty that the towers were knocke down by planes smashing into the side of them and the resulting effects.

those towers didnt need thermite to knock them down. after those catastrophic hits, they were more than capable of coming down on their own.

it takes more of a stretch to prove that thermite knocked them down than it does to prove a couple hundred ton aircraft hitting it at 600 mph did the deed. the answer is obvious.
Click to expand...
No thick rubber bands to attack the lincoln log forts?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top