ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
my only arguement about the steel is that there were suitable conditions for natural furnaces to occour
none of that needs an assay of the steel composition so what ever point you were trying to make doesnt mean shit
The great thermite debate.
- Thread starter hazyintentions
- Start date
none of that needs an assay of the steel composition so what ever point you were trying to make doesnt mean shit
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
The Iron Age is the archaeological period generally occurring after the Bronze Age, marked by the prevalent use of iron. The early period of the age is characterized by the widespread use of iron or steel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Age
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Age
The computer doesn't need spell check, if you use a browser it has one built in. And I'm not attacking your spelling, I'm attacking your mental capacity to remember how letters are put together to form words. If your words are misspelled and become other words, how are we supposed to know?
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
3 posts later and still nothing but an attack on spelling...
i'll ask again is this you giving up on being a twoofer?
what's a twoofer, is that like a subwoofer? Know of anyone who shares in your theory of a crumbled fallen building turning into a foundry?
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
let me spell this out for you very simply
fire + insulation + oxygen = much hotter fire
check back thru this thread i have mentioned this before and other people agree
tell you what lets hear some good reasons from you why it wouldnt work ?
Mr Neutron
Well-Known Member
If I did ask it before, this is the second time I did not receive an answer.
A quote from your linked article: "1. A building owner would never be in a position to dictate to fire personnel or emergency workers whether his building should be pulled or demolished."
The author uses the term "pull" before later saying that it is not used in that context.
Mr Neutron
Well-Known Member
What is spell check?
doc111
Well-Known Member
My apologies, I've been dealing with a family crisis and have had little time to post. I was surprised to see Drama had posted to me after days and STILL is bringing nothing to the table in the way of evidence.
To Drama: I have never even implied that there are NO conspiracies, in fact I've even said it in this very thread that "I'm sure some things are conspiracies: This, IMO isn't one of them". You seem to ignore the lion's share of the evidence we are posting. Why is that? Is it because you might have to re-evaluate your positiong? 10 years later and still no proof of a conpiracy and very little evidence of one either. We do, however, have MOUNTAINS of evidence that suggests the events of 9/11 went down pretty much like the gubbermint says it did. Let me ask you another question; why do you think the vast majority of experts in this field don't buy the conspiracy theories? Are they all just stupid? Has the gubbermint gotten to all of them? Please, take a moment to really think before you answer these questions (Take a couple of days if you need it! lol!
). To Samwell: So, you think I'm arrogant, huh? Well, you are certainly entitled to your opinion, but I'm a bit puzzled. I don't get called arrogant very much by the people who know me best. In fact, I don't ever recall being called arrogant. Now, you don't know me from Adam, and know nothing about me except for what I've posted. Perhaps I am a bit arrogant. I've achieved a lot in my life and am proud of those achievements. I'm not sure why you are so insistent that there was actually "molten steel" at the WTC site. It's never been proven and it's been theorized by MANY an expert to be molten aluminum (if there was actually molten metal at all) which had picked up a bunch of shit which made it appear to be glowing yellow, appearing similar to molten steel. The glowing orange shit in the picture that the excavator is picking up????? Nobody has ever been able to say what it was but it didn't appear to be molten. There are many things which can glow red/orange and appear like steel but could be any number of things (FYI, I've seen steel become glowing red in an ordinary fire numerous times). Even if there were molten steel at the WTC, what does it prove? Does it somehow prove thermite was used? No. Does it prove anything at all in the way of some conspiracy? Nope! It doesn't prove shit, because if it did, there would be NUMEROUS people, credible experts, clamoring out of the woodwork in an attempt to get a pulitzer prize in journalism or some shit. lol! You can continue to insult my intelligence if you'd like. I've posted numerous links from credible sources which debunk many of the myths surrounding this terrible event. What have YOU brought to the table (besides insults and childish remarks with nothing to back them up)?
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
notice the quotation marks around the "pulled" and the OR
he is specicially talking about the "pulled" meme and your pulling him up for quoting it
let me guess its another in the long list of people "involved" in the conspiracy....
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
its a wonder of modern technology that you dont realise how much you use till you end up on comp without one.
doc111
Well-Known Member
Not true. I've addressed the "pull it" question at least once and possibly more than that in this thread. I didn't go back to check, but here is the link:
http://debunking911.com/pull.htm
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
If I did ask it before, this is the second time I did not receive an answer.
QUOTE]
Originally Posted by Mr Neutron
It's an incredible story, to be sure. Honestly, I cannot understand how anyone with a fair amount of curiosity and open-mindedness can buy the official version. It seems more like fantasy than any conspiracy theory I've ever heard.
The 9/11 Omission was under funded and stone walled at attempts to question key players in the Bush admin.
They also failed to address WTC 7 which was NOT hit by a plane.
Huge surges in the purchasing of put options prior to 9/11 on United and American Airlines; the companies that insured the WTC (which was privatized 6 weeks earlier); companies hurt by the attack Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, BoA; and huge purchases of 5-year Treasury notes.
Or how about the 6 or 7 hijackers that surfaced after 9/11 to say that they are not dead nor hijackers.
Or how about the 5 Israelis celebrating the fall of the towers?
Or Ghouliniani being warned of the building collapse, 10 before it happened.
Or why FEMA was dispatched to NYC on 9/10 to run disaster drills.
Or why the air defense was scheduled to simulate hijacked airplanes being flown into buildings. This, of course, followed a major change in the chain of command in the air defense mechanism, where Cheney was put in charge of all operations. How conveeeenient.
Or why was the crime scene cleaned up so quickly that a proper investigation could take place and all materials either destroyed or recycled. (all three crash sites)
Or Larry Silverstein, on camera, saying "we decided to pull it", meaning to drop building 7.
Or the massive denial campaign that followed implying that if you didn't buy into the official story, you're a terrorist.
Or how about the pools of molten steel found weeks after the attack.
"Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty." W
i feel like im hitting my head against a very thick brickwall here
building 7 was hit by a mother fucking giant fucking huge fucking falling fucking sky scraper
hint thats worse than a plane...
"Huge surges in the purchasing of put options prior to 9/11 on United and American Airlines; the companies that insured the WTC (which was privatized 6 weeks earlier); companies hurt by the attack Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, BoA; and huge purchases of 5-year Treasury notes."
irrelevant unless you got link to 911
"Or how about the 6 or 7 hijackers that surfaced after 9/11 to say that they are not dead nor hijackers. "
poor journalism and an over abundance of muslims with same name
"Or how about the 5 Israelis celebrating the fall of the towers?"
irrelevant got muslims celebrating across world too
"Or Ghouliniani being warned of the building collapse, 10 before it happened."
linky?
"Or why FEMA was dispatched to NYC on 9/10 to run disaster drills."
irrelevant unless you got link to 911 itself
"Or why the air defense was scheduled to simulate hijacked airplanes being flown into buildings. This, of course, followed a major change in the chain of command in the air defense mechanism, where Cheney was put in charge of all operations. How conveeeenient."
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/NORAD
"Or why was the crime scene cleaned up so quickly that a proper investigation could take place and all materials either destroyed or recycled. (all three crash sites)"
sorry but what were they searching for in 100's thousands of tons?
"Or Larry Silverstein, on camera, saying "we decided to pull it", meaning to drop building 7."
pull the fire fighters from dangerously unstable building?
"Or the massive denial campaign that followed implying that if you didn't buy into the official story, you're a terrorist."
cause the conspiracies storys are pretty damaging to some americans mentalhealth
i can attest to that personally as i have watched steady decline over last decade
"Or how about the pools of molten steel found weeks after the attack."
this ones a zinger its actually to do with wtc
got any evidence of molten steel at wtc? i warn you i got a snazzy youtube for you
ps if your gonna put stuff up links/evidence of your claims normally helps
Mr Neutron
Well-Known Member
I'm not even going to ask.
Mr Neutron
Well-Known Member
So... "pull IT" really means pull THEM out? Really? Thanks for confirming my suspicions.
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
"specifically" ok thats my spelling
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meme
meme (
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/meme
meme(meme)
Pronunciation:/miːm/
- an element of a culture or system of behaviour passed from one individual to another by imitation or other non-genetic means.
- an image, video, etc. that is passed electronically from one Internet user to another.
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
yawn.......
Mr Neutron
Well-Known Member
irrelevant
Mountains? Mole hills more like.To Drama: I have never even implied that there are NO conspiracies, in fact I've even said it in this very thread that "I'm sure some things are conspiracies: This, IMO isn't one of them". You seem to ignore the lion's share of the evidence we are posting. Why is that? Is it because you might have to re-evaluate your positiong? 10 years later and still no proof of a conpiracy and very little evidence of one either. We do, however, have MOUNTAINS of evidence that suggests the events of 9/11 went down pretty much like the gubbermint says it did. Let me ask you another question; why do you think the vast majority of experts in this field don't buy the conspiracy theories? Are they all just stupid? Has the gubbermint gotten to all of them? Please, take a moment to really think before you answer these questions (Take a couple of days if you need it! lol!
I noticed it took you a few days to respond to my reply, did you have to take a few days to think of something good to say, or were you busy with other things?