Ron Paul on Cavuto
- Thread starter sync0s
- Start date
sync0s
Well-Known Member
If you watched the video and read what I said you would know that wasn't the main focus....yay! another ron paul thread.
he polled at 5% among the latest survey of likely voters.
I expect more from you UB,
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i am not going to watch a ten minute video.If you watched the video and read what I said you would know that wasn't the main focus....
I expect more from you UB,
in ten minutes, i could read pages and pages of text, and would.
sadly, ron paulophiles seem to have this annoying habit of just pointing to the video and saying "watch!"
did i mention 5% by the way? your revolution SUCKS.
sync0s
Well-Known Member
Fine. If you were as smart as you claim to be you would be intelligent enough to play the video and read your "pages of text" while listening. Ever heard of multitasking? It might help expand your brain beyond your ignorant turtle shelli am not going to watch a ten minute video.
in ten minutes, i could read pages and pages of text, and would.
sadly, ron paulophiles seem to have this annoying habit of just pointing to the video and saying "watch!"
did i mention 5% by the way? your revolution SUCKS.
Remember, I said 5:20. You can skip ron paul and make it a 4:40 video, but again... that ignorant thing clouded your oh so wise brain from that fact didn't it.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i don't want to watch even 4 minutes and 40 seconds. as i said, if you can present a succinct, high-level summary of this oh so important circle jer-ummmm, conversation, be my guest.Fine. If you were as smart as you claim to be you would be intelligent enough to play the video and read your "pages of text" while listening. Ever heard of multitasking? It might help expand your brain beyond your ignorant turtle shell
Remember, I said 5:20. You can skip ron paul and make it a 4:40 video, but again... that ignorant thing clouded your oh so wise brain from that fact didn't it.
remember, your revolution has bagged a whopping 5% of likely voters. winning?
sync0s
Well-Known Member
Do you know why I keep saying your ignorant? Because after 5:20 this video has nothing to do with Ron Paul. Also, in respect to your "likely voters," I know that I don't fall under that category nor does a large group of people I know who support Ron Paul. I don't give a shit about polls. Plus, likely voter criteria means having voted in the midterm elections which is only 2/3 of those who voted in the last presidential election. 33% goes a long ways in the presidential votes.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
unfortunately, those polls are pretty good predictors/indicators.
your revolution is
and again, i don't care if they talk about turtle fornication practices. listening to ron paul is like watching an octopus fall out of a tree, it is painful. the man is so fucking squirrelly. don't even get me started on how much of a blowhard neil cavuto sounds like.
sync0s
Well-Known Member
Well then let's be mature and functional adults. I'll let you have your opinion, you let me have mine. If you don't like Ron Paul and refuse to watch the video, just don't comment on it, and I won't call you ignorant. I primarily wanted discussion on the things the panel of "experts" had to say. However, now that you have blasphemed the topic I suppose I'll just move on.unfortunately, those polls are pretty good predictors/indicators.
your revolution is
and again, i don't care if they talk about turtle fornication practices. listening to ron paul is like watching an octopus fall out of a tree, it is painful. the man is so fucking squirrelly. don't even get me started on how much of a blowhard neil cavuto sounds like.
Charlie Ventura
Active Member
Hey Uncle Buckie ...
Your saying that the Ron Paul "revolution" sucks, right? I don't believe you've ever said why. How about giving us ten points that refute what Ron Paul wants to do with the country, you know, things like foreign policy and monetary policy. We will all be awaiting your input.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Your saying that the Ron Paul "revolution" sucks, right? I don't believe you've ever said why. How about giving us ten points that refute what Ron Paul wants to do with the country, you know, things like foreign policy and monetary policy. We will all be awaiting your input.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
1. allow the mechanisms that permit segregation
2. abolish all public schools
3. thinks he knows better than my wife about decisions concerning her health
4. allow insurers to prevent my wife from getting insured
5. unrealistic pipe dream that is the gold standard
6. free market purism will have disastrous consequences
7. thinks my friends in same-sex relationships have an "unacceptable lifestyle"
8. compulsive turtle fornication
9. paints on his eyebrows, is comically old
10. his annoying as shit followers
11. close ties with JBS
yadda yadda yadda
2. abolish all public schools
3. thinks he knows better than my wife about decisions concerning her health
4. allow insurers to prevent my wife from getting insured
5. unrealistic pipe dream that is the gold standard
6. free market purism will have disastrous consequences
7. thinks my friends in same-sex relationships have an "unacceptable lifestyle"
8. compulsive turtle fornication
9. paints on his eyebrows, is comically old
10. his annoying as shit followers
11. close ties with JBS
yadda yadda yadda
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
by the way, i said the "revolution" sucks because it is a shitty "revolution", it isn't one at all.
didn't he have a "revolution" in 2008? and how many votes did he get in the general election? about 40,000 out of 100,000,000+? a whopping 0.000325%?
that is not a revolution, that is 40,000 people with turtle fetishes.
didn't he have a "revolution" in 2008? and how many votes did he get in the general election? about 40,000 out of 100,000,000+? a whopping 0.000325%?
that is not a revolution, that is 40,000 people with turtle fetishes.
tomahawk2406
Well-Known Member
one more quote in someones sig from the 1700's and im going to vomit all over myself.
tomahawk2406
Well-Known Member
yeah we tried that free market thing.............didn't work. so hell thats do it again!!!!!
sync0s
Well-Known Member
sync0s
Well-Known Member
Just above I proved you wrong on that and you stick to your guns. Okay...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i have ron paul on videotape saying "of course the goal is to privatize ALL schools". did you somehow make that tape not exist? jam those words back into ron paul's turtle licker? expel the belief from that noggin of his?
it is ON TAPE. there are articles on it. ron paul wants to abolish public schools, that is his goal, he said it.
deprave
New Member
Please Try again...All I see is a bunch of things that are false...a whole lot conspiracy theory also.
sync0s
Well-Known Member
Oh really? The same video you posted? The one where he says:
So, by your magical ability to twist words, would "going in the direction of less spending" mean, in fact, no spending?Ron Paul said:
We should privatize all of our schools, though. Just my opinion
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
but he didn't say he wanted to "go in the direction of privatizing MORE schools", he said go in the direction of privatizing ALL schools".
so if he said the equivalent in relation to your example, it would be "we should go in the direction of cutting ALL spending". very subtle word twist there on your part, i almost did not catch it.
hell, it ain't about educating our next generation of citizens, it's clearly all about the benjamins.
AWESOME philosophy.