bob harris
Well-Known Member
The other problem with this description of cbd, is that it's talking mental disorder...that's a different clinical area than neurological disorder. I know I know..sounds like splitting hairs. But it's a distinct difference, clinically speaking.THC is being found to be less medically useful then CBD by most people in the field of mental health. CBD is thought now to counteract the "paranoia" friihtening effects and could lead someday to a use as an anti-psychotic. it's combinations of all the canabanoids of a plant profile that create a high/stone hence the sativa indica seperation; their ratios in pure forms of indica or sativa are similar in effect and canabinoid profile to each other. Indica stone sativa high. P.S. the feds "legalized" it but wouldn't sell the stamps that were eluded to in the law to people without proof of having crop; then if you tried to prove you had crop to make it legal and get your stamp BOOM busted for having it without a stamp. I got a good book for you bob: Columbus and other lies my history teach told me. check it out. Got a pot verson too. Love you bob....
Similar to the previous attempt to show cbd effective against spasms (hence Parkinson's) Spasms are caused by muscle/skeletal problems...the actual cause is in the muscle,or bone. Tremors and seizures are caused by neurological disorders.. causes in the brain. it sounds like splitting hairs..but it's a big difference in application.
As Ron White would say..it's not THAT the muscle twitches, it's WHY the muscle twitches.
You guys want to bash me for splitting hairs...that's not what I'm doing. I'm differentiating..it's not meant to piss you off...but it's important in the context of the discussion...Does that make sense to you?