The Fed is audited Regularly What is all this Audit the Fed Non sense?

Dan Kone

Well-Known Member
I'm going to have to agree with the Ron Paul people here (yikes!). The FED should be independently audited, probably by both the government and an outside independent watchdog group.

Also I'll agree on them with the point that it's nuts that an organization like the FED that isn't accountable to anyone and operates outside our government for the most part has authority over our money.
 

dukeanthony

New Member
I'm going to have to agree with the Ron Paul people here (yikes!). The FED should be independently audited, probably by both the government and an outside independent watchdog group.

Also I'll agree on them with the point that it's nuts that an organization like the FED that isn't accountable to anyone and operates outside our government for the most part has authority over our money.
The Fed is Audited by both the Goverment and An independant ACCOUNTING AGENCY EVERY YEAR

Thats the Whole point of the Thread
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
The Fed is Audited by both the Goverment and An independant ACCOUNTING AGENCY EVERY YEAR

Thats the Whole point of the Thread
You have no point. All you do is scratch the surface, copy and paste, and make vapid comments. Quit trying to be right instead of looking for the truth.

Ever wonder why no one knew and you still don't know about the trillions of dollars going overseas to help foreign companies? Or the billions paid to the Libyan Bank? Of course you don't wonder, you want to continue with the failed policies of the status quo.
 

Mcgician

Well-Known Member
The founding fathers never intended a centralized, private bank. Nevermind having to audit one, it shouldn't even be there.
 

Mcgician

Well-Known Member
The Fed is Audited by both the Goverment and An independant ACCOUNTING AGENCY EVERY YEAR

Thats the Whole point of the Thread
The GAO has an atrocious record for it's projections, look it up. They are historically one of the worst "independent gauges" for ANY future financial government expenses, period. FACT.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
The founding fathers never wanted to give up slavery either
Race baiting against the founding fathers, except of course you are patently incorrect, and a bag of lefty hate. You should really take a break from all the self-loathing liberal puppet heads that you parrot like a good little partisan hack.

See what I did there, I co-opted your and UB's technique of marginalizing the opponent with pathetic and transparent name calling, based on nothing more than the fact that you have a different opinion than my own. Now I get why you two do it IN EVERY POST, it's fun... flaccid and sad, but fun.

http://american_almanac.tripod.com/ffslave.htm
 

deprave

New Member
The founding fathers never wanted to give up slavery either
Actually thats not enitrely true...I'm sure you know that since you got it all figured out...they are totally audited dude ...and it has to be secret...what?

its all good they just got a bee quiet about some sutff.....................................so that people don't cheat...................................go ..go back to sleep now little sheeple night night time..........you just sleep out on the couch Ill be in bed with your wife......watching for theives to keep her happy......its gotta be secret so keep the door shut...Its okay im with the federal government ill just keep her safe.

[video=youtube;IgqeL0AvZfo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgqeL0AvZfo&feature=related[/video]
 

deprave

New Member
And so the Moral of the story here is that ...Ron Paul better become POTUS or we are never going to get a full government audit of the fed and poverty and war will continue to increase...the police state will continue to grow...and things will go on as normal...We will just have to settle for our babies butts getting fingers in them and swallowing/ditching roaches before entering cars and planes. Hey we gotta be safe from the terrorist right, if babies gotta get fingered to save lifes is it worth it?????? (serious question)
 

dukeanthony

New Member
Wouldnt it be Cool to have every business in the USA have their Audits Public records

Investing would be so much more interesting


Wouldnt it?
 

LD25Delta9

Active Member
As many well and good points as you all make(except for you duke), you are all wrong about what the American dollar has been backed by. The American Government/US Treasury has owed the Fed since it's creation, including their earlier manifestations: The First and Second banks of the United States. The Fed created currency with interested owed. It's kinda hard to pay interest back when the money needed to pay it back hasn't been created yet.... Think about it... This essentially means that regardless of how much money all the gold, silver, and titanium in the world is worth, if you want cash for it, the Fed has to create it, which will then need to be paid back with interest. Here's a link to a REALLY good video fully explaining it: [video=youtube;1gKX9TWRyfs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gKX9TWRyfs[/video] This video holds more relevance now than it ever did...
 

dukeanthony

New Member
Zeitgeist: The Movie is a 2007 documentary film by Peter Joseph. It asserts a number of conspiracy theory-based ideas, including the Christ myth theory, alternative theories for the parties responsible for the September 11 attacks in 2001 and that bankers manipulate the international monetary system and the media in order to consolidate power.
The film was released online on June 18, 2007, on zeitgeistmovie.com.[1] While the film has been praised by some for being "compellingly edited", it has also been criticized for factual inaccuracies, and the quality of its arguments, with critics describing it as "agitprop" and "propaganda".[2][3][4][5][6] A sequel, Zeitgeist: Addendum, focuses further on the monetary system and advocates a resource-based social system influenced by the ideas of Jacque Fresco and the Venus Project.[7][8] Following Zeitgeist: Addendum, Peter Joseph created an organization called the Zeitgeist Movement to promote the ideas of Fresco's Venus Project.[9] Joseph also produced an updated 2010 version of the original film in order to address dated material and improve its overall accuracy.[10] A third film called Zeitgeist: Moving Forward was released theatrically on 15 January 2011 and online on 25 January 2011.[11] Peter Joseph has stated that its topics are focused on human behavior, technology, and rationality.[12]
 

LD25Delta9

Active Member
Wow, you are so good at copy and pasting, I can taste the Kinko's ink and Elmers paste in the air. I am glad, though, duke, that you were so unaware of this gross atrocity upon mankind, that you had to wiki the shit out of it just to get your info. Now move along sheep...Baaah, baaaaahhhhhh!
 

dukeanthony

New Member
Wow, you are so good at copy and pasting, I can taste the Kinko's ink and Elmers paste in the air. I am glad, though, duke, that you were so unaware of this gross atrocity upon mankind, that you had to wiki the shit out of it just to get your info. Now move along sheep...Baaah, baaaaahhhhhh!
The mentally deranged always claim others cannot see the truth
 

LD25Delta9

Active Member
Mentally deranged...

A mental disorder or mental illness is a psychological or behavioral pattern generally associated with subjective distress or disability that occurs in an individual, and which is not a part of normal development or culture. Such a disorder may consist of a combination of affective, behavioural, cognitive and perceptual components. The recognition and understanding of mental health conditions have changed over time and across cultures, and there are still variations in the definition, assessment, and classification of mental disorders, although standard guideline criteria are widely accepted. A few mental disorders are diagnosed based on the harm to others, regardless of the subject's perception of distress. Over a third of people in most countries report meeting criteria for the major categories at some point in their lives. The causes are often explained in terms of a diathesis-stress model or biopsychosocial model. In biological psychiatry, mental disorders are conceptualized as disorders of brain circuits likely caused by developmental processes shaped by a complex interplay of genetics and experience.[1]
Services are based in psychiatric hospitals or in the community. Diagnoses are made by psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, or psychiatric social workers[citation needed] using various methods, often relying on observation and questioning in interviews. Treatments are provided by various mental health professionals. Psychotherapy and psychiatric medication are two major treatment options, as are social interventions, peer support and self-help. In some cases there may be involuntary detention and involuntary treatment where legislation allows.
Stigma and discrimination add to the suffering associated with the disorders, and have led to various social movements attempting to increase acceptance.


If Wiki is your law that you love to cite so much, then you, sir, are grossly out of order. You are not a psychiatrist, clinical psychologist or psychiatric social worker that has observed me or questioned me in an interview. Your claim of my mental derangement holds no validity and only further proves that you are an ass... Besides how the fuck can someone as mentally deranged as myself be so damned eloquent? Here, just in case you didn't know what that word meant.

Eloquence (from Latin eloquentia) is fluent, forcible, elegant or persuasive speaking. It is primarily the power of expressing strong emotions in striking and appropriate language, thereby producing conviction or persuasion. The term is also used for writing in a fluent style.
The concept of eloquence dates to the ancient Greeks, Calliope,(one of the nine daughters of Zeus and Mnemosyne) being the Muse of epic poetry and eloquence.
Eloquence derives from the Latin roots: ē (a shortened form of the preposition ex), meaning "out (of)," and loqui, a deponent verb meaning "to speak." Thus, being eloquent is having the ability to project words fluidly out of the mouth and the ability to understand and command the language in such a way that one employs a graceful style coupled with the power of persuasion, or just being extremely graceful in the interpretation of communication.
Petrarch (Fracesco Petrarca), in his study program of the classics and antiquity (Italian Renaissance) focused attention on language and communication. After mastering language, the goal was to reach a “level of eloquence”, to be able to present gracefully, combine thought and reason in a powerful way, so as to persuade others to a point of view. Petrarch encouraged students to imitate the ancient writers, from a language perspective, combining clear and correct speech with moral thought. The Renaissance humanists focused on the correlation of speech and political principles as a powerful tool to present and persuade others to particular concepts. At the core of presentations was the use of graceful style, clear concise grammar and usage, and over time the insertion of rational and emotional arguments.
In modern times, colloquial speech entered into presentation styles deemed eloquent.
[edit] Eloquent politicians

Politicians are often termed eloquent. Marcus Antonius, c.83 B.C.–30 B.C., Roman politician and soldier gave one of the most memorable speeches in history, dramatized by William Shakespeare in the play Julius Caesar; Shakespeare used Antonius's famous opening line "Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears".
Other speakers and speeches termed eloquent:

Eloquence is both a natural talent and improved by knowledge of language, study of a specific subject to be addressed, philosophy, rationale and ability to form a persuasive set of tenets within a presentation.
"True eloquence," Oliver Goldsmith says, "Does not consist ... in saying great things in a sublime style, but in a simple style; for there is, properly speaking, no such thing as a sublime style, the sublimity lies only in the things; and when they are not so, the language may be turgid, affected, metaphorical, but not affecting." (Of Eloquence, 1759)
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Wouldnt it be Cool to have every business in the USA have their Audits Public records

Investing would be so much more interesting


Wouldnt it?
If the Federal reserve prints up $1 trillion and puts it out in the economy it will affect you a GREAT deal. If B&B rentals in Halifax, Virginia decides to raise its rental rates it doesn't affect you in the least.
 

LD25Delta9

Active Member
Overwhelming opinion? The voices in your head don't count...And neither do your co-workers. Like I care about what the cashiers at Wal-Mart think anyways...
 
Top