Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
CO2 isn't the only problem.I feel uncomfortable with unreasonable opposition. It's different if 97% of the general public believe something, or if 97% of experts in a field believe something specifically pertaining to their field of study.
I'm a libertarian, so unfortunately my vote doesn't really get counted towards my actual centralist views. I vote for which ever party holds the political views closest to mine when I vote. I refuse to belong to any party.
I care what you think because how you live your life and what you base your beliefs on affects me, whether I want it to or not. If we don't try to curb our CO2 emissions it is possible to reach a point of no return. When denialists like you try to convince other people that they don't need to be concerned, and that global warming is all a lie, it's detrimental to the entire world. That's why I care, not some lame, half concocted excuse about my job needing grants, or me being a leftist.
If you look at global warming similarly to the prisoner dilemma, it's easy to see that even if somehow the massive amount of data that's been collected was all wrong, and the world isn't getting warmer form CO2 emissions, the 2 possibilities with the best possible outcomes are the two that involve toning down CO2 emissions.
We dump MASSIVE amounts of oil in the ocean, just about every 10 years. On "Accident"
We have an ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD basically surrounding the Earth for the past 50 years, THAT WAS NEVER STUDIED, and has never been here before.
And I'm sure there is PLENTY more we could solve to "head in the right direction"
To blame CO2 and get mad at people like Doer is dumb. Just do what you and your 97% want to do about CO2, and come to him when you want to talk about another problem, that he can see too.
I was just thinking about it, and they should make the roof of every building maintain a garden, for CO2, O2 purposes.
Since that building is standing ontop of a spot that probably used to be grass and trees.