ThE sAtIvA hIgH
Well-Known Member
as an athiest ive heard your claims of a god yet im not convinced of anything you type , please type your evidence of a god existing
you believe in something yet you have no evidence of that something even existing ?you can keep waiting cause you know damn straight that what you are asking is impossible and possible at the same time... dichotomy if you will, if you know what that is...
either way, i will leave the beast alone
...he landed a good 30 yards ahead of the car without a visible scratch on him. All head injury, possibly from taking out the targa top on his way out (snapped the steering column too). According to the RC's, the car traveled 1/2 a kilometer before stopping. Other friend in the car was thrown out and landed on the shoulder of the highway. Good for some skin grafting, but otherwise walking and normal. When I got to the scene, the car was still running. Long time ago so it's easier to talk about.i dont care about tsh thread... it makes no sense that he continues to make threads about the same thing and no mod does anything... so i thought i would troll his dumbass threads... and the toke and talk is filled with people that are just waiting to post stupid shit on a serious thread...
anyways, getting back on topic... that 69'mach sounds sweet man... i bet it was black with white racing stripes... 400horses is a lot, but this guy is pushing 1000+ to the rear wheel.... my dream truck is that ford lightning man, if you have ever driven one, it is an awesome trip... smoking a jay going to school and passing everyone doing 130... back in high school though, nowadays, i aint that dumb lol...
that sucks for your friend man, must of been paralyzed or something for such motor lose...
So the inability to prove the actual existence of any God is proof enough that there is not one? Rather short and close minded.you believe in something yet you have no evidence of that something even existing ?
Translation: Dealing with real people and their nuanced beliefs is too hard. Lets hear from a fundie who comes across as an idiot so I can sling my usual mud instead of having to actually think about my answers.lets have some veiws from a real christian , i dont count olly as a true christian as he distances himself from the bible and everything a proper christian believes in.
its to easy for him to claim to be a christian yet distance himself from what real christians believe in , its an easy scape goat
lol coming from a hypocrite like you lol just cause you use long drawn out posts to make your point dosent make you any better . ive allready posted a previous long drawn out thread from you mocking olly , you seem to think mocking someone isnt so bad if you do it more interlectualy but i simply cant be botherd to construct those kind of posts id rather just get right on down to the point .Translation: Dealing with real people and their nuanced beliefs is too hard. Lets hear from a fundie who comes across as an idiot so I can sling my usual mud instead of having to actually think about my answers.
My point was not that it's okay to intellectually mock someone, but that an intellectual could see I was mocking behavior, not beliefs. I was mocking oly's behavior in the same way, and for the same reason, as I mock yours. Quite frankly, it begs to be mocked. You are the polar opposite of a fundie, running around certain that your views are right and eager to belittle those who see it differently. You hide behind a pretense of reason, when you are unable to reasonably explain anything yourself, and have openly admitted to trolling. You want to simply regurgitate rebuttals you have heard from Hitchens and the like, but are unable to dynamically utilize your views to roll with the punches, so you fall back on insults and flaming. This behavior seems odd to reasonable people which is why we speak out about it. It serves to erode the atheistic stance in the same way fundamentalism is detrimental to the religious stance.lol coming from a hypocrite like you lol just cause you use long drawn out posts to make your point dosent make you any better . ive allready posted a previous long drawn out thread from you mocking olly , you seem to think mocking someone isnt so bad if you do it more interlectualy but i simply cant be botherd to construct those kind of posts id rather just get right on down to the point .
athiesm cant be eroded its a personal response to someones claim, its not a group or gathering of people , you could say im eroding my own athiestic stance but you cant say, im eroding 'the ' athiestic stance .My point was not that it's okay to intellectually mock someone, but that an intellectual could see I was mocking behavior, not beliefs. I was mocking oly's behavior in the same way, and for the same reason, as I mock yours. Quite frankly, it begs to be mocked. You are the polar opposite of a fundie, running around certain that your views are right and eager to belittle those who see it differently. You hide behind a pretense of reason, when you are unable to reasonably explain anything yourself, and have openly admitted to trolling. You want to simply regurgitate rebuttals you have heard from Hitchens and the like, but are unable to dynamically utilize your views to roll with the punches, so you fall back on insults and flaming. This behavior seems odd to reasonable people which is why we speak out about it. It serves to erode the atheistic stance in the same way fundamentalism is detrimental to the religious stance.
athiesm cant be eroded its a personal response to someones claim, its not a group or gathering of people , you could say im eroding my own athiestic stance but you cant say, im eroding 'the ' athiestic stance .
and im yet to meet someone here who has said anything to me i havent easily replied to .
You made a deceptive thread asking why religious beliefs persist. If you were really interested in an answer you would investigate and attempt to be unbiased. You would have a real desire to seek the information. Instead, this is just another thread designed to entrap believers into answering one narrow question so that you can be in the position to feel superior. You act as if most people who believe in God claim there is evidence, when in fact the bible itself addresses this issue with faith. Your question of proof is really only useful on the level of Sunday school, and is in fact quite easily answered in the mind of a believer.athiesm cant be eroded its a personal response to someones claim, its not a group or gathering of people , you could say im eroding my own athiestic stance but you cant say, im eroding 'the ' athiestic stance .
and im yet to meet someone here who has said anything to me i havent easily replied to .