This Is Scary!

[Canna Sylvan]

Congress also Authorized Taking out al qaeda Targets
Guess what americans Were in Al Qaeda?

ETA
Do you see how Idiotic you RP supporters are?

According to your own rules, you should be banned here because you piss off several mods. Before you tell me this is a private forum, that's the whole point. Yours, mine or anyone else's life shouldn't be decided like that. It would be petty for the site owners to ban you, but it's only a ban on a forum. Not a ban on your life. To the owners and a great number here their opinion to ban you would be justified. That's how site bans, employment firing, membership revokement, and friendship terminations work. Not declaring enemies of the state ( terrorists etc). That's how states like the Nazis, who you say you despise so much, operated.

 

[Canna Sylvan]

.
No they dont
Al Awhacky Chose not to have a trial

So did the jews, fuck them too huh?

 

[budlover13]

Congress also Authorized Taking out al qaeda Targets
Guess what americans Were in Al Qaeda?

ETA
Do you see how Idiotic you RP supporters are?

But they need to have a trial if it is an interrupted plot. You a fan of thought police? Do you realize that of the examples of what can qualify one as a "suspected terrorist" are so vague and crazy (more than a 7 day supply of food? Give me a fucking BREAK! That's GOT to cover 90%+ of American households, yourself included most likely.) Wow, you know how much restraint it is taking right now to stay within forum rules?

It's ok though. i really DO think you are some kind of plant in the politics forum if you "can't" see the danger in this legislation.

 

[Canna Sylvan]

Then get me banned And I will go back to Laughing at you without Comment

I never said I wanted you banned.

You agree with Nazi philosophy without even knowing it. The only difference is who you justify as the enemy. The Nazis didn't form because they wanted to hate on jews, that was just a side effect. The sad part is once you get duke's utopian government, duke doesn't get to decide the enemies. Just like the German people didn't get to. Duke could one day be labeled the enemy and duke would have no say. Duke would have no one to blame but duke.

 

[budlover13]

Ill start worrying when They target Americans in the USA
Who they could easily arrest

Heh. That moment is going to be when the real show starts.

And then it'll be too late.

 

[budlover13]

Im prepared
You going to go out in the streets?
Oh and Bringing up the Mormons
They got a great Apocolypse Check list
Really Check this out and download it
http://www.emergencypreparationforum.com/ldsmanual.pdf

Let's suffice it to say that i and a group of friends have a plan in place.

 

[Charlie Ventura]

Endless wars. Orwell was right ... he just had the date wrong.

 

[mccumcumber]

You know how Orwell claimed that the British government was watching him. And everyone just laughed it off and said, "Oh he's just paranoid." Turns out, the British government was watching him.

 

[budlover13]

You know how Orwell claimed that the British government was watching him. And everyone just laughed it off and said, "Oh he's just paranoid." Turns out, the British government was watching him.

Fuckin' conspiracy theorist!

 

[Charlie Ventura]

You know how Orwell claimed that the British government was watching him. And everyone just laughed it off and said, "Oh he's just paranoid." Turns out, the British government was watching him.

1984 was a great book. Remember, in the final analysis ... its all about a boot in your face forever!

 

[budlover13]

1984 was a great book. Remember, in the final analysis ... its all about a boot in your face forever!

[video]http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=george+orwell+final+warning&oq=george+orwell+final&aq=0&aqi=g1&aql=&gs_sm=c&gs_upl=1474410l1481850l0l1484089l21l19l1l6l6l0l395 l2995l2.0.7.3l12l0[/video]

 

[blimey]

Has anybody realized that the government could link growing marijuana to terrorism if they tried hard enough. Then they can use ir all they want.

 

[The Ruiner]

Wow...again!

Another thread started about a subject that has been shown to be misrepresented, and agreed to by an originally dissenting party.

Do you guys ever get tired of intentionally misinterpreting issues without ever caring to read the actual text of what it is you are discussing?

Is it too much to ask for you to inform yourselves of the issue?

What's with you guys?

 

[Rob Roy]

Is it possible there are two versions of this bill? One listing American citizens and one exempting them? I thought I read something that Rand Paul tried to amend the bill to exempt American citizens, but that the Senate didn't go for that.

 

[The Ruiner]

Is it possible there are two versions of this bill? One listing American citizens and one exempting them? I thought I read something that Rand Paul tried to amend the bill to exempt American citizens, but that the Senate didn't go for that.

The senate did vote against the Udall amendment...

 

[sync0s]

Has anybody realized that the government could link growing marijuana to terrorism if they tried hard enough. Then they can use ir all they want.

Bush administration already did man...

Remember the ad campaigns about how drugs directly supported the taliban and al qaeda?

 

[budlover13]

The senate did vote against the Udall amendment...

After Senator Rand Paul required a recorded vote right?

i believe that is what i've read. That it passed on a verbal vote but he used procedure to require a recorded physical vote and then it failed.

 

[The Ruiner]

Seriously? The text of the bill is explicitly clear. Why don't you CITE the text, as I have done...What's with neglecting WHAT IS in favor of unsubstantiated paranoid fantasy ?

Also, it wasn't just Rand Paul that voted against it, Kerry, Pelosi, Reid, others as well...

 

[budlover13]

Seriously? The text of the bill is explicitly clear. Why don't you CITE the text, as I have done...What's with neglecting WHAT IS in favor of unsubstantiated paranoid fantasy ?

Also, it wasn't just Rand Paul that voted against it, Kerry, Pelosi, Reid, others as well...

But did it not pass on a verbal vote until a recorded vote was required?

i know i've read it. Just checking my sources.

 

[The Ruiner]

Do you trust THIS source...

http://www.dailypaul.com/189650/udall-amendment-fails-rand-paul-1-of-only-2-republican-yeas