I think you got this, but I was of course joking about memorizing the thread and serious about an FAQ/Index. This thread has been such a learning process, it's probably a pretty big thing for new folks to tackle at this point, with information spread all throughout. Maybe we can put something together as a group and the Prof can link to it in the initial post.
I agree the Flora Sun is not perfect, I just haven't come across anything that has a better graph to my eyes. The 550 spike is tall but narrow, so as I understand it there isn't a lot of actual wattage going into it (am I wrong about this?). There is also a spike at ~610-615 as you note. This is actually where the peak is on the Red Sun graph, though it sounds like the Red Suns are really at 630 and their chart is just not very good. Also, HPS are heavily focused in this yellow/orange area and while it's not the most efficient part of the spectrum, it's far from wasted.
It's worth pointing out that nobody besides for me, I think, has really latched onto this bulb - so it's not very popular right now. I'm not thrilled with the bulb color, but don't have a lot to compare it to. I don't see any graphs I like better for a base bulb though. It's a broader spectrum bulb to be sure, but one that fits the shape of the PAR curve quite well. But is it as good as it looks in the chart even? Beats me.
hyroot - sorry to hear your yield was lower than expected! Keep us updated!
Yes I was of course kidding...sort of...it actually does appear that you have this thread memorized lol! I think the Index/FAQ would be very helpful; it'd be nice to have a centralized, concise summary of the basic premise of the science involved, a list of the bulbs and their spectral graphs, bulb configurations, and so forth so thread participants (myself included) can stop asking: what the graph for such and such a bulb is, or how do I arrange my 8 lamp fixture? I do think it's important for new people to read the whole thing at least once, as long and tedious as that might be, but even for people like myself who've read it three times, it's still hard to keep track of everything. If it helps get things going, Here are some post numbers where bulb configuration is discussed (this doesn't cover the entire thread, only the first 80 pages or so):
72, 285, 318, 328, 394, 405, 412, 441, 458, 478, 489, 492, 493, 504, 520, 552, 556, 573, 574, 658, 668, 680, 704
As for the Flora Sun Graph I'm not sure about the total percentages and how they are arrived at. Intuitively I would say that if you integrate the area under the curve (calculus 1) you will have the total output of the bulb, so you may be right that narrower peaks mean less total output than wider smoother ones. I'm not positive about this though. So then it would stand to reason that if you used the partial differential equation and integrated just the sectional area of the single peak, then inserted it into a proportional ratio with the entire integral's area, you would theoretically get the percentage output of that one peak.....theoretically. One thing to be careful of is if the y-axis measuring intensity is linear or exponential. I'm pretty sure it's linear, but not all spectral graphs are the same.
All that being said, I'm excited for you to get those AquaMedic and Gro-Lux bulbs! I think they both have great potential!
Yes I think the HPS do have output in the yellow/red range, which would explain a little bit about why they work for flower, but when you really think about it especially in the context of all the science in this thread, it almost doesn't make sense that HPS bulbs are actually as efficient as they are. You'd think that if they only are functioning at roughly 20% PAR, the results would be mediocre at best, yet I think we would all agree that they do still produce pretty well....kind of a head scratcher when you examine it in context of the theory of photosynthesis.