Shannon Alexander
Well-Known Member
2 trolls don't make a goat, so they say...
[/QUOTE]by that, then you are a troll too.
Im a chill dude, just dont go spewing atheist hate around me, i dont like it.
Would you just let people talk shit about the things you believe in and take it?
QUOTE=The Chemist Brothers;6832903]yea, i guess when you get trolled and troll back, that makes 2 trolls, but a troll is still a troll no?
how come other animals arent grossed out by there privates and other animals privates ? you dont see chimps desperately trying to cover up .As an atheist, every time my friend brings his huge unaltered dog over here I find myself wishing they made jockstraps for animals. This isn't because religion has made me ashamed of it's nakedness, but because I find it distasteful to have a huge set of nuts dragging across my sofa. If my friend came over naked, I would be even more upset, so I appreciate clothes and it has nothing to do with God.
+rep... for the best profile pic i have ever seen in my entire life!! ROFL!!! vegita doesnt break dance!! BAHAHAHA!!!!!! so great!yea, i guess when you get trolled and troll back, that makes 2 trolls, but a troll is still a troll no?
And a dog will eat vomit. Do you suppose religion has made us grossed out by vomit? Stop trying to pretend you have thought about this beyond the fact that it will inflame those incapable of resisting troll bait. Modesty does not arise from sin.how come other animals arent grossed out by there privates and other animals privates ? you dont see chimps desperately trying to cover up .
And a dog will eat vomit. Do you suppose religion has made us grossed out by vomit? Stop trying to pretend you have thought about this beyond the fact that it will inflame those incapable of resisting troll bait. Modesty does not arise from sin.
Now, if you cared to put more than 4 words into your original post, and pointed out situations where Christian parents refuse to let their children wear clothes that expose too much arm skin or show too much ankle, you would be pointing out a case of religion fostering irrational shame. But it wasn't necessary to sort through nuance in order to get a rise out of oly, so you didn't bother.
actualy fool , the original question was brought to my attention from a christopher hitchens video i watched , and to be honest i reckon all our bodily functions like burping vomit pooh and wee were all made taboo by religion .And a dog will eat vomit. Do you suppose religion has made us grossed out by vomit? Stop trying to pretend you have thought about this beyond the fact that it will inflame those incapable of resisting troll bait. Modesty does not arise from sin.
Now, if you cared to put more than 4 words into your original post, and pointed out situations where Christian parents refuse to let their children wear clothes that expose too much arm skin or show too much ankle, you would be pointing out a case of religion fostering irrational shame. But it wasn't necessary to sort through nuance in order to get a rise out of oly, so you didn't bother.
how come other animals arent grossed out by there privates and other animals privates ? you dont see chimps desperately trying to cover up .
actualy fool , the original question was brought to my attention from a christopher hitchens video i watched , and to be honest i reckon all our bodily functions like burping vomit pooh and wee were all made taboo by religion .
As I said, you didn't understand the nuance of Hitchens point, which is why you came here and put only enough words in your post to bait conflict. You made no effort at all to articulate and explain yourself, and now we see that you have not made this effort inside your own intellect either. You want to emulate a great mind like Hitchens but lack the ability to even parrot him. This makes you a poser.actualy fool , the original question was brought to my attention from a christopher hitchens video i watched , and to be honest i reckon all our bodily functions like burping vomit pooh and wee were all made taboo by religion .
i reckon if two human babys were placed on a island together, with no outside influence , they would grow up not caring about nudity or other bodily functions modern humans feel so ashamed of, you only have to look at some remote tribes in the world who use there own feaces to bulid houses etc . .
oh and heinz get over me n oliver , we have a love hate relationship .
This brings up a question that, not being a history buff, I can't answer. When did humans begin the practice of covering their nudity? Did it predate major religion? Was there any religious aspect to the development? I suspect the reasons were based in practicality rather than religious doctrine.
'The reasons we dress and appreciate clothes are as different as the clothes we wear, and religious incited shame is only one small factor that is mostly confined to those who are religious. Is it inexcusable that religion places such sexual constraints and connotations on it's followers'
well i disagree , i believe a few hundred years ago religious instruction is all that there was , i dont believe anything else had such a strong influence on human life than religion .i cant actually think of any other reason ?
This is a good question, and it confines the conversation to shame of nudity, which excludes pragmatic aversion and simple innocence. There are many reason to want to avoid being nude, but only a few reason behind finding nudity shameful. You should have asked this question in the original post. Not only does it avoid time wasting conflict by clarifying your position, it causes people to stop and think. Being an effective atheist means presenting your criticisms as challenges rather than ridicule.why is it it you think we develepoded shame about nudity ?
actualy fool , the original question was brought to my attention from a christopher hitchens video i watched , and to be honest i reckon all our bodily functions like burping vomit pooh and wee were all made taboo by religion .
i reckon if two human babys were placed on a island together, with no outside influence , they would grow up not caring about nudity or other bodily functions modern humans feel so ashamed of, you only have to look at some remote tribes in the world who use there own feaces to bulid houses etc . .
oh and heinz get over me n oliver , we have a love hate relationship .
This brings up a question that, not being a history buff, I can't answer. When did humans begin the practice of covering their nudity? Did it predate major religion? Was there any religious aspect to the development? I suspect the reasons were based in practicality rather than religious doctrine.
This is a good question, and it confines the conversation to shame of nudity, which excludes pragmatic aversion and simple innocence. There are many reason to want to avoid being nude, but only a few reason behind finding nudity shameful. You should have asked this question in the original post. Not only does it avoid time wasting conflict by clarifying your position, it causes people to stop and think. Being an effective atheist means presenting your criticisms as challenges rather than ridicule.
I think the biggest reason any of us feel ashamed of our bodies would be from our ideas of beauty and attraction. We have all encountered people who look good at first but seem to become less attractive as they shed clothing. Like covering a scar, we want to present our best features and hide our worst. There are also those who know they look good and are embarrassed to flaunt it. Just as someone can be oddly modest about their musical skills or athletic abilities, a person can be uncomfortable with admiration of their body.
The other reason people might feel shame is because they have been explicitly taught. This can and often does come from sexual or psychological abuse. Being constantly told you are ugly as a child, or having your body used against your will, can teach you that sex and our bodies are a despicable thing. This is very similar to what religion does, and by any standard the two should be equally deplorable.
Now I would like to ask you, how is it that religious teaching can be compared to child abuse, as I have just done? I left out what makes religion similar. Can you explain the rationale behind this comparison?[/QUOT
of course i can , but i have no interest in entering conversation or ridle solving with you , just to stroke your online ego .
'The reasons we dress and appreciate clothes are as different as the clothes we wear, and religious incited shame is only one small factor that is mostly confined to those who are religious. Is it inexcusable that religion places such sexual constraints and connotations on it's followers'
well i disagree , i believe a few hundred years ago religious instruction is all that there was , i dont believe anything else had such a strong influence on human life than religion .i cant actually think of any other reason ?why is it it you think we develepoded shame about nudity ?
do you think there was many athiests a few hundred years ago ?
i dont believe neandethal man had any shame of flashing his bits to the rest of the village ?