Who Else Knows That Ron Paul will NEVER be President?

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Everyone knows what makes Ron "the bigot" Paul a bigot, why are you pretending that you never heard why? :roll:


Search "ron paul stormfront"
Search "ron paul racist newsletters"

Other bigots point out that he denied that he wrote the racist newsletters but it wasn't just one, it was several over MANY YEARS (1978 - 1999), he had to know and approve because he wrote them. How can he CLAIM that he didn't write them, didn't know and/or didn't approve, after his OWN campain claimed he was just "quoted out of context," if the newsletters had his name on them for OVER TWO DECADES? Of course he denied writing them, he wanted to get elected. He FAILED to get elected President twice and he'll FAIL again, thank God.

The point is...even Ron "the bigot" Paul knows he'll NEVER be President, he's only in the race because gullible supporters keep sending him money and he wants the attention. If that makes Paulies sad or mad, I can live with that... :D
Have you seen the latest SisterMaryElephant Newsletter? You write about how much you hate other races, how much you like to bash gays, how much you enjoy the neo Nazi meetings and also you write about your favorite food, human blood.

You are a Gay hating, White supremacist, bigoted blood sucking vampire. Its all proven in the newsletter you wrote. And you must have written it, it has your name on it.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
Everyone knows what makes Ron "the bigot" Paul a bigot, why are you pretending that you never heard why? :roll:


Search "ron paul stormfront"
Search "ron paul racist newsletters"

Other bigots point out that he denied that he wrote the racist newsletters but it wasn't just one, it was several over MANY YEARS (1978 - 1999), he had to know and approve because he wrote them. How can he CLAIM that he didn't write them, didn't know and/or didn't approve, after his OWN campain claimed he was just "quoted out of context," if the newsletters had his name on them for OVER TWO DECADES? Of course he denied writing them, he wanted to get elected. He FAILED to get elected President twice and he'll FAIL again, thank God.

The point is...even Ron "the bigot" Paul knows he'll NEVER be President, he's only in the race because gullible supporters keep sending him money and he wants the attention. If that makes Paulies sad or mad, I can live with that... :D
lol!

Everyone knows Ron Paul is a bigot? Well, I guess I'm not included in that "everyone" statement, because I don't think he's a bigot.

I am aware of this "racist newsletter" you are referring to, but I've read the newsletter in question and it was quote mined and, yes, things he (supposedly) said were taken out of context. This is nothing more than political spin and hyperbole. You're probably right though. I doubt he will get elected because we have SOOOOOO many citizens who think that the same old B.S. Repub vs. Dem is going to get us out of the mess we are in. Things are not getting better, they are getting worse (at least where I live). There are NO jobs, foreclosures are still happening at an alarming rate, housing prices have still not recovered.............need I go on? Personal liberties are being eroded........there's only one candidate that I can think of who wants to protect YOURS and MY personal liberties. It's not Romney, Santorum, Perry, or even Obama. I find it funny that so many people think that the 2 parties that got us into this mess are going to save us. They aren't! We desperately need change, REAL CHANGE, not some campaign slogan. We need someone to shake things up and send a message to Washington. Do you honestly think any of the Republican candidates or Obama can or will make things better?:wall:
 

SisterMaryElephant

Active Member
Ron "the bigot" Paul's OWN WORDS:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/01/03/ron_paul_asked_if_he_sees_himself_in_oval_office_not_really.html

"Later in the interview Paul is asked if he sees himself sitting in the Oval Office.
Terry Moran, ABC News: "When you lay your head on your pillow at night, do you see yourself in the Oval Office?"
Ron Paul: "Not really."
Ron Paul went on to say that he’s not blind to the odds, but they are "not as slim as they were 25 years ago."


Too funny, see how deluded his fanatics are? We know who's REALLY full of shit... :D
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
Have you seen the latest SisterMaryElephant Newsletter? You write about how much you hate other races, how much you like to bash gays, how much you enjoy the neo Nazi meetings and also you write about your favorite food, human blood.

You are a Gay hating, White supremacist, bigoted blood sucking vampire. Its all proven in the newsletter you wrote. And you must have written it, it has your name on it.
I'm not familiar with this newsletter. Got a link?:blsmoke:
 

SisterMaryElephant

Active Member
lol!

Everyone knows Ron Paul is a bigot? Well, I guess I'm not included in that "everyone" statement, because I don't think he's a bigot.

I am aware of this "racist newsletter" you are referring to, but I've read the newsletter in question and it was quote mined and, yes, things he (supposedly) said were taken out of context. This is nothing more than political spin and hyperbole. You're probably right though. I doubt he will get elected because we have SOOOOOO many citizens who think that the same old B.S. Repub vs. Dem is going to get us out of the mess we are in. Things are not getting better, they are getting worse (at least where I live). There are NO jobs, foreclosures are still happening at an alarming rate, housing prices have still not recovered.............need I go on? Personal liberties are being eroded........there's only one candidate that I can think of who wants to protect YOURS and MY personal liberties. It's not Romney, Santorum, Perry, or even Obama. I find it funny that so many people think that the 2 parties that got us into this mess are going to save us. They aren't! We desperately need change, REAL CHANGE, not some campaign slogan. We need someone to shake things up and send a message to Washington. Do you honestly think any of the Republican candidates or Obama can or will make things better?:wall:
It wasn't "a newsletter" it was SEVERAL over 2 decades and there were plenty of bigoted things said. The point is that when the racist newsletters first came out his own campain didn't DENY them, they just said that Ron "the bigot" Paul was quoted out of context. Now he denys he said it. He's a LIAR. He can't be quoted out of context if he didn't write them and they admitted that he did.

As I've said, I've flushed things better than obama and Ron "the bigot" Paul too so, yes, any REAL Republican is better than obama.

Hope that helps...because even RP knows he'll NEVER be President. :D
 

SisterMaryElephant

Active Member
His newletters are out of print and achives are hard to find but here's a story from 2008 by people that DID find them:

Search "TNR Angry White Man"

http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/angry-white-man

"Paul’s newsletters have carried different titles over the years--Ron Paul’s Freedom Report, Ron Paul Political Report, The Ron Paul Survival Report--but they generally seem to have been published on a monthly basis since at least 1978. (Paul, an OB-GYN and former U.S. Air Force surgeon, was first elected to Congress in 1976.) During some periods, the newsletters were published by the Foundation for Rational Economics and Education, a nonprofit Paul founded in 1976; at other times, they were published by Ron Paul & Associates, a now-defunct entity in which Paul owned a minority stake, according to his campaign spokesman. The Freedom Report claimed to have over 100,000 readers in 1984. At one point, Ron Paul & Associates also put out a monthly publication called The Ron Paul Investment Letter.
The Freedom Report’s online archives only go back to 1999, but I was curious to see older editions of Paul’s newsletters, in part because of a controversy dating to 1996, when Charles "Lefty" Morris, a Democrat running against Paul for a House seat, released excerpts stating that "opinion polls consistently show only about 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions," that "if you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be," and that black representative Barbara Jordan is "the archetypical half-educated victimologist" whose "race and sex protect her from criticism." At the time, Paul’s campaign said that Morris had quoted the newsletter out of context. Later, in 2001, Paul would claim that someone else had written the controversial passages.
...
But, whoever actually wrote them, the newsletters I saw all had one thing in common: They were published under a banner containing Paul’s name, and the articles (except for one special edition of a newsletter that contained the byline of another writer) seem designed to create the impression that they were written by him--and reflected his views. What they reveal are decades worth of obsession with conspiracies, sympathy for the right-wing militia movement, and deeply held bigotry against blacks, Jews, and gays. In short, they suggest that Ron Paul is not the plain-speaking antiwar activist his supporters believe they are backing--but rather a member in good standing of some of the oldest and ugliest traditions in American politics."
-
First, in 1996, his campaign claimed he was "quoted out of context"...then, 5 years later, he denied writing them because he wanted to get re-elected. He's a liar AND a bigot. If you didn't know or believed his lies, you're just ignorant. If people knew that he's a white supremacist bigot and they support him anyway, then they're a pile of dung too.


Hope that helps...but it wont. :D
 

SisterMaryElephant

Active Member
Oh, you like the quote-y kind of facts?

"...opinion polls consistently show only about 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions..." -- Ron "the bigot" Paul
"...if you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be..." -- Ron "the bigot" Paul
"...I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal." -- Ron "the bigot" Paul

Also confirmed by the TNR link above. ;)

Good luck with your delusions...
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
His newletters are out of print and achives are hard to find but here's a story from 2008 by people that DID find them:

Search "TNR Angry White Man"

http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/angry-white-man

"Paul’s newsletters have carried different titles over the years--Ron Paul’s Freedom Report, Ron Paul Political Report, The Ron Paul Survival Report--but they generally seem to have been published on a monthly basis since at least 1978. (Paul, an OB-GYN and former U.S. Air Force surgeon, was first elected to Congress in 1976.) During some periods, the newsletters were published by the Foundation for Rational Economics and Education, a nonprofit Paul founded in 1976; at other times, they were published by Ron Paul & Associates, a now-defunct entity in which Paul owned a minority stake, according to his campaign spokesman. The Freedom Report claimed to have over 100,000 readers in 1984. At one point, Ron Paul & Associates also put out a monthly publication called The Ron Paul Investment Letter.
The Freedom Report’s online archives only go back to 1999, but I was curious to see older editions of Paul’s newsletters, in part because of a controversy dating to 1996, when Charles "Lefty" Morris, a Democrat running against Paul for a House seat, released excerpts stating that "opinion polls consistently show only about 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions," that "if you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be," and that black representative Barbara Jordan is "the archetypical half-educated victimologist" whose "race and sex protect her from criticism." At the time, Paul’s campaign said that Morris had quoted the newsletter out of context. Later, in 2001, Paul would claim that someone else had written the controversial passages.
...
But, whoever actually wrote them, the newsletters I saw all had one thing in common: They were published under a banner containing Paul’s name, and the articles (except for one special edition of a newsletter that contained the byline of another writer) seem designed to create the impression that they were written by him--and reflected his views. What they reveal are decades worth of obsession with conspiracies, sympathy for the right-wing militia movement, and deeply held bigotry against blacks, Jews, and gays. In short, they suggest that Ron Paul is not the plain-speaking antiwar activist his supporters believe they are backing--but rather a member in good standing of some of the oldest and ugliest traditions in American politics."
-
First, in 1996, his campaign claimed he was "quoted out of context"...then, 5 years later, he denied writing them because he wanted to get re-elected. He's a liar AND a bigot. If you didn't know or believed his lies, you're just ignorant. If people knew that he's a white supremacist bigot and they support him anyway, then they're a pile of dung too.


Hope that helps...but it wont. :D
Seriously?????? These are your "FACTS"? lmfao!!!!!!! C'mon Man!!!!!!!:roll:
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
I'm not argung for a candidate, I'm pointing out FACTS about one. I don't tell people who to vote for...or not. ;)
Until recently the Democratic party had a grand wizard of the KKK in congress. But he was a liberal so that is ok...

ROFLMAO!!!

Seriously, dont throw rocks from INSIDE your glass house.
 

deprave

New Member

  • Obama - Funded by goldman sachs and other mega banks, appointed these people to his cabinet, consistently violates the constitution, supports the drug war, wants more wars.

    Mitt Romney - Same fucking thing

    Ron Paul - Defends the constitution consistently for over 30 years, doesn't want wars, not funded by mega banks and corporations but solely by the people, wants to end the drug war.

    /End of Discussion.​


 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Oh, you like the quote-y kind of facts?

"...opinion polls consistently show only about 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions..." -- Ron "the bigot" Paul
"...if you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be..." -- Ron "the bigot" Paul
"...I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal." -- Ron "the bigot" Paul

Also confirmed by the TNR link above. ;)

Good luck with your delusions...
"I like to Rape little children" _SisterMaryElephant
"I like to spit on anyone who isn't a pure race, like me" -SisterMaryElephant
"Jews need to go into the ovens" SisterMaryElephant
"I stole 300 units of blood from the bank so i can have a snack" SisterMaryElephant
You said all of these things in your newsletter, prove you didn't or its 100% true.
 

Howard Stern

Well-Known Member
This thread is full of so much shit I don't even know where to begin, its so entirely irrelevant I am not even going to get involved so really just have fun in your imaginary world...

Obama - Funded by goldman sachs and other mega banks, appointed these people to his cabinet, consistently violates the constitution, supports the drug war, wants more wars.

Mitt Romney - Same fucking thing

Ron Paul - Defends the constitution consistently for over 30 years, doesn't want wars, not funded by mega banks and corporations but solely by the people, wants to end the drug war.

/End of Discussion.
Solely by the people? Unless you are gay or anything but white! So funny how so many people on here only support Ron Paul just because of his stance on drugs!
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Solely by the people? Unless you are gay or anything but white! So funny how so many people on here only support Ron Paul just because of his stance on drugs!
yeah, there must be like 1 person who supports him soley because of his stance on drugs. Most people support him because of his views on the Constitution, the proper role of government and economics.
 
Top